The chief of Shill Kosovaʹ who beat his wife two days ago faced his sister in court

According to the newspaper Insider, there are about seven months since the daughter of late businessman Latif Kryeziu has denounced her brothers at the Pristina Foundation Court. She has complained that the brothers have expelled her from his home to multimillion-dollar companies led by the late father.

Two of them are famous: Al Petrol/Shell and Royal. She called for help from the court. She has demanded that one of her brothers be detained, according to her indictment in court. The sister has also complained that one of her brothers even attacked her when she asked for her father's business. A court hearing is held today.

The proposal of the deceased's daughter to place Security Mass in multimillion - dollar businesses controlled by her brothers has been considered.

What happened in session today? - This is the sister's version.

The Heritage of the Dead Chief LatifProposal V. K, requires setting the measure of security to the share of property left by her father now felt in Kosovo and Albania, as well as inherited shares in “Al-Perol”, to her family-proposors H. K, Arber Kryeziu, Lulzim Kryeziu, H.K. and M.K.

Representatives of the Security Measure Proposal for the V.K. were Arian Koci and Gerta Ragip, who were present at the hearing.

Lawyer Koci in this session declared he remains completely close to the security proposal.

The same added that proposor V. K as legal heir to the deceased Latif Kryeziu that two years have been deprived of having to enjoy his inheritance, and when he has demanded of her right she has been attacked by one of her brothers.

He also made the expansion of a security measure proposal, adding two other properties found in Albania, basing this expansion on property in Article 146, paragraph 1 of the Law on Heritage.

On the other hand, Koci lawyer said the proposer claimed he was told “this isn't his or what he wants you to be, but he didn't want you to be a woman”.

He also said that the proposy has stated that since her brothers are influential people, they have prevented her from getting information about the company “Al-Perol”

“Two requirements for measures of 30 million security in a way that reasons the proposal for guaranteeing”, he said today.

According to the statement on the 25 May 2022 security measure proposal, made by the indictment V. K, against indictees/against H. K, Lulzim KryeziuH. K, M.K., all descendants of the deceased Latif Kryeziu, it is said that the proposal has been constantly hampered by the realisation of its rights from opponents of the proposal, to the extent that the same one has no information about inheritance riches.

It says that such behaviours of opponents of the proposal clearly indicate that the same could alienate, donate or sell the inheritance share, bypassing the will and rights of the proposal.

While, according to the proposal, opponents of the proposal are said to enjoy and possess inheritance wealth regularly on a daily basis, taking action with this wealth without the knowledge of the proposal.

So, on this basis, the proposor is asking from the Constitutional Court in Pristina to approve the proposal for setting up a security measure, so that it is prohibited from the opponents of security, life, hiding, loading or possession of inherited shares of companies “Arhing” St. P.K, “Al-Perol” St. P.K and “Ryal Trade” Sh.P.K.

The proposor also demands approval of the security measure proposal so that it is prohibited from the occupants of security alienation, hiding, loading or possession of cadastral trains inherited from their late father.

This is the version of the brothers businessmen denounced by their sister

For H.K. counterproposors and Arber Kryeziu, represented lawyer Naser Peci, while for counterpossors Lulzim Kryeziu and H. K, have represented lawyers Korab Sejdiu and Blinera Osmani.

Lawyer Peci rejected the security measure proposal, saying he considers the legal condition not met by Article 297.1, dot b, of the County Procedure Law.

The same added that most of the conflicting real estates are burdened with mortgages, so it has ascertained that there is no single danger that any intertrial action could jeopardise or prevent the eventual demand of the proposal.

Also, lawyer Sejdiu generally rejected the security proposal, as according to him the proposal fails to prove elements from Article 297.1 of the LPK, because it has demanded the appointment of a measure of real estate, which in the majority are not subject to investigation in this procedure, as there are personal properties of security opponent Lulzim Kryeziu, not of the legissu.

“Oncei are not subject to examination or properties that are on behalf of “Al-Perol” Sh.p.k., as a special legal subject and which are not the subject of investigation because they are not the inheritance owner's property but the particular property of “Al-Perol” Sh.p, k”, he added.

While lawyer Osmani stated that while the legacy is in the name of the late Latif Kryeziu, there is no danger that any interjuries can and hide as the prosecutor claims.

Meanwhile, lawyer Sejdiu claimed that despite the fact that the successor has passed away, he has the manager who leads the company, who is once the mother of the proposor.

Otherwise, at the beginning of this session after the Sejdiu association was announced that the session is being monitored, opposed the presence of monitors, as the question in question is about aspects of personal nature and the publication of personal information whether directly or indirectly may be the concept of privacy.

However, this was rejected by lawyer Koci, who said there is no legal reason for the case to be addressed differently than other cases.

On the other hand, IKD monitors are professionals and all they have to do is act according to the memorandum they have with the court, so I challenge attorney Sejdiu”, the same one has said.