The wife of Lipjan says her husband's family harassed her in “Facebook” to break marriage

This A.A statement in the quality of the witness has been delivered at the trial hearing Wednesday at the Constitutional Court in Pristina, the branch in Lipjan.

According to her, the accused had opened an account on the social network “Facebook” with an unknown name and put a picture of her husband and another picture of an adult child. She has said that these acts were taken by the accused to testify that her husband is married and has children.

On the other hand, she said that the accused then through that account began to apply to her family and once sent her personal request.

She has said that identifying the accused as a molester was done through her husband.

The damaged said it stands in whole with the statement given to the police, where she once again recalled that statement, saying she does not remember correctly whether it was 2018 or 2019 when the accused had first summoned her brother L.A and told her that her husband, who is in the outside world, has another wife and a child.

During the continuation of her testimony, she said that she never accepted any request for association that the accused sent her and that she never wrote with the person in question.

She said she never met physically with the accused in this case.

Initially, the accused B.B. and its defender, Sousa Avdiu, gave up reading the indictment, since they said they were clear, and the accused claimed he did not feel guilty of the criminal work he was charged with.

In the opening address, prosecutor Besnik Jakupi has said that, remains close to the indictment, considering the same has been raised on good-based suspicion, while during the trial review with evidence management, it will prove that the B.B. defendant would prove has committed the criminal act described as the device of the indictment.

Prosecutor Jakupi's opening word has been supported and damaged by A.A., which has been attached to prosecution and property-juridic demand.

On the other hand, defendant B's defender. B, lawyer Avdiu, has said they consider evidence delivered to the indictment not consumed elements of criminal harassment, so in this judicial review, they believe the opposite of what the prosecution is claiming so that, protected by it will be declared innocent.

Prosecutor Jakupi, in this phase of the procedure, proposed that L.A. be cooled in the witness's quality.

The proposal was rejected by the defendant's defender, but as such was approved by Judge Avdirrahman Gashi.

Judge Gashi further said that today's court review is halted because of receiving the test with the hearing of the aforementioned witness, as his continuation was scheduled on October 8, 2021, at 09:00, the L.A. witness will be cooled.

Unlike the indictment filed by the Founding Prosecutor on March 19, 2021, defendant B.B. has deliberately harassed A. A, now damaged, with his constant attention behavior so that in November 2019, he has been communicating by phone with the injured brother L.A. and parent D. A, telling you that N. N, the husband of the injurer, who is located abroad, has an extramarital child with a foreign citizen, reports the “Justice Trust”.

In an indictment, with the aim of harassment on January 10, 20121, has harassed the injured by opening a false profile on the “network. Facebook”, and posted photos of a guy “N, what happens to damage has caused a sense of great emotional concern.

With that, he committed a criminal offence “Disposition” by Article 182, paragraph 1, Penal Code of the Republic of Kosovo