French scientist who thinks differently about the Coronaviros, convinced of his theory: Time will tell

In the midst of COVID-19 epidemic, the anticonformist doctor from Marseille releases his book: “Epidemies, real danger, and false news”.

Didier Raoult, recall the history of the coronary, as well as the current controversy over his request for the use of the Chloroquin drug.

Marqueyez Professor Didier Raoul, who took time to listen at the national level, for using the drug against malaria Choloroquine) against the new choreography, now his solution against COVIDD-19 is in the attention and discussion of many states included the official Paris line.

In a book that goes on sale this week, the Controvers physician, who runs the Infectology Department at the La Timone Hospital in Marseille, makes an update of the entire situation on pandemic.

He takes his role by the teacher to explain to us, what Coronavirus is, and what he's worried about, too. In his book He has explained his attitudes even on cholera and typhus.

He's trying to explain why the approach he has against the coronary is not considered by public health authority. And in the end, he makes a philosophical and quasi-political approach to society, just as he shows in the title of the book Le le Víis Danger, and Fawses Alertes - False Warnings That Drive Reality.

On Antimalia Medicine CHLOROQUINE

Let's remember that despite these successive ʹdramats, around the new respiratory virus, mortality from respiratory infections has always come down.

From the data we have, Bacterological or viral respiratory infections, 30 years ago have been the cause of the death of 4.5 million people a year, currently killing about 2.6 million people in one year.

This spectacular decline in death rates in one year results from improved hygiene, or the use of antibiotics that reduce the risk of fatal infections. But also because of Pneumok's vaccine in young children, which also protects older ones. The success dramas of viruses have been associated with dramatic increases in life expectancy.

The speed of Chinese response to the epidemic management was amazing. In particular, development of anti-Inflammatory molecules. They could show that CHLOROQUINE, the most recommended drug in the world, was better treatment and prevention against coronarys. This is the case that makes the coronary, a respiratory infection of the simplest to prevent and treat.

Chinese Coronavius

The Chinese Coronavirus first appeared in Wuhan, where there was an epidemic of pneumonia. We will return to the Chinese behavior strategy since the SARS epidemic, which allowed them to discover the Corona virus, test its sensitivity to anti-inflammers and apply diagnostic techniques in record time.

In any case where there was a market where all the animals destined for consumption, including bats, were shown pneumonia, from which some serious, sometimes deadly, sometimes to older, and people with other pathology.

The hysterical description of this virus from China, as we know of a high mortality rate at its beginning, caused a worldwide hysteria, but the death toll in proportion to the affected would be reduced in the days to come. It's a general phenomenon.

The high mortality initially displayed is as a result of testing serious cases at first. Testing only heavy cases at first, the death toll is high, but increasing mass testing, the death toll rate decreases.

In January 2020, only China was dead from the Coronavirus, and exactly Wuhan was at a rate of 5.6% of the affected and the rest of China 0.5%. )ka means it will probably reach normal flu rates at 0.1%.

As for the spread, it is designated by the number of people infected. And of course, this way of explaining the spread is not reasonable. It's a way of explaining in math on very complex phenomena, which is not explanatory.

The causes of the disease are humans. But people do not spread the disease equally. Some of the people are super-sticks, kids like, they're the most supportive but less sick. Old age, they're the sickest, but less vigilant. Immmunoducents with permanent viral multilications.

One of my associates insists that the important difference between Chinese and Europeans is that the Chinese spit on the ground. The danger of spreading through saliva is remarkable.

This epidemic situation would probably not spread outside of China, but we must be aware that respiratory infections are eco-system diseases. This epidemiological situation may not be reproductive outside of China.

Always remember that infectious diseases are eco-system diseases. The Pastaurian vision, a microbe, a man, is interesting concepts but they date from the XIX century, and they explain only a small part of things. There's diversity in germs, number of microbes, transporter, transmission routes, even inter-human diseases. That means we can't extend the epidemiology of what we see in one place in the rest of the world.

The Long History of Coronavirus

Coronavirus (Latin corona ʹ crown) is a very large family of viruses that owe their name to the fact that they seem to have a crown. These are very common viruses that affect both birds and mammals, and some have a human transmission.

The latter are frequent, they kill from time to time, but they are completely ignored by the press and most of the world's health authorities. Which is really weird, because coronarys are the third cause of viral respiratory infections.

These viruses have the difference between being the largest kind of RNA viruses and therefore show frequent mutations. These are viruses that have long been known to produce upper respiratory infections, especially bronze and diarrhea

Their story begins in 1965 when Tyrel and Bynoe identified a virus taken from a colder child. This virus was called 229E. Sometime later, Macintosh, in the case of a perspiration sample, found another very close virus, which would be called OC43, and immediately thereafter the name Coronavirus would be chosen to appoint this family.

They have been known since 1967, but their diagnosis has been difficult because their generation culture alone allowed it to do so. At the time of molecular diagnosis alone, their real role may begin to be appreciated.

The third one to be discovered in a human pathology was the SARS virus, identified in 2003 and as we have seen, would cause 880 deaths before it was suddenly stopped in the summer of 2003 without ever resurfaced.

Coronavirus Arabo-Sudian, MERCS-coron, found in 2012 when a patient was admitted to the hospital in Jeddah. And finally, the Coronavius from China was isolated in 2019.

So, as we have seen, the SARS remained essentially limited to the Far East, in addition to a mysterious epidemic exported to Toronto, linked to a man travelling from Hong Kong to Toronto, conditions of management imposed following the beginning of the epidemic (such as masks, gloves, gloves and uniforms) enabled the ban on broadcasting within city hospitals. In terms of MERCS koronavirus, there was also a world hysteria with the risk of broadcasting this virus outside its original focus.

In fact, it's basically a zooz (living-man-carried transmission) connected to the camel that carries it. It is not known why the carrier camel provided cases in Saudi Arabia rather than in surrounding areas where camels are also carriers of the virus, suggesting that there is an intermediate host.

After I got there, I assumed that the baboons, which are hugely numerous in Saudi Arabia and that they frequent camels and live in Peru-turban areas within very incredible size groups (a few hundred animals), may have been these middle hosts.

This should remind us of the disproportionship between declared dangers and real dangers, and the risk of alarming predictions. In this regard, it should be emphasized that these fever episodes would have caused some countries, including China, to install the doors for temperature detection to test fever patients to prevent them from transmitting a disease to the countries they reach.

Face News (false news)

The danger of Chinese coronary changing French or global mortality statistics is zero. There are some elements in this disproportionship between reality and noise: Fear of new diseases, the interest of labs selling antivirals (Gilead made a spectacular increase in the stock market), interest for those producing vaccines as a precaution (even though it is not known whether the disease will still be in one year), those with happiness on television as virtual experts, those who give signs of fear, and those who see themselves as angelic saviors.

This event will have confirmed to me that there is more truth in social networks and that the fake news label is sometimes the desperate weapon of some media to continue to exist.

One of my videos was temporarily labelled as CHAfake on nine-x0> by the editor-in-chief of the newspaper Le Monde, as well as by the French Health Ministry.

I had distributed information from Chinese authorities about the use of a drug I've already talked about and we know it well (chloroquine and its defrocloured hydrochlory), its effectiveness in preliminary studies in 100 cases, confirmed by short communication and at a press conference by Professor Zing, a Chinese authority known worldwide.

This sparked violent reactions, which required that I withdraw my communication and even received anonymous threats I was subjected to.

It's increasingly difficult to know what we're talking about, and that's why we've created a weekly information site in YouTube with the title "On a le le le le le le le le madhet intelulgent" We have the right to be intelligent

Fear of Death

The current epidemics and the pseuda-pidime situation reflects very deep behavior in people. History is filled with fear of natural disasters and epidemics, and the Bible provides many examples. In the face of inexplicables, in the face of the brutality of phenomena, hypotheses were more religious at the time or were based on human guilty behavior.

Recently, Bautrillard, in 1970, allowed us to realize that some of our laziness is fed by fear of death and disasters, while meteorology (as a renewal of sun worship) conquers other passive information from the media.

The endurance of religious conduct and religious fear, as with magic, was well reported by Mircea Eliade in its treaty on the history of religions, which shows that, in various forms, the main topics of fear and religious conduct have not changed.

Parody

In our societies, there are different roles:

The role of those who do research or discover things, the role of those who manage, and the role of those who transport information. With the acceleration of the time we see both in information and in management, managers are determined for short periods of time that undergo repeated elections, as I have already said.

There is more and more confusion between decision-making power, executive power and fourth power, that of the press.

However, if it is natural for the press to raise the alarm, it is not natural for people in charge, politicians, to be of the same nature, and to have the same kind of reaction. Management requires taking the necessary time, but today becomes useless as the consequences of the managers' actions will not apply directly to them, they will come later and drown in new information.

This union between the media and the decisionmakers can be observed, practically by marriage or by transfer, from one profession to another, a minister who behaves as animator, an animator who acts as minister.

This presents a real problem that damages the balance of forces. In addition, Jean Bautrillard's other book, "Symulacres et Simululation ʹ Parodites and Parodization," predicted the creation of a new digital world.

In this world that Bautrillard calls "Heiper Realeʹ, the attitude that served as an inspiration for Philip K's film Matrix, in fact, has nothing to do with physical-chemical reality as it did in Philip K's book "Symulatures." Dick, where politicians are simulaters, holograms and robots.

So the total break-up of reality observed with reported reality is a growing problem.

It's less and less an amplification, but a distortion of reality.

When an informer doubles 20 a mortality risk and divides by 100 another risk, we're no longer in an exaggeration, but in another world. And this is actually happening.

Real figures themselves become unconvinced when they do not confirm the prevailing theory.

In practice, there is really no solution but for new technologies to allow the existence of a new power followed by unfiltered communication. We can see this in the science field.

There is the censorship of news items that are not part of the general flow of technical thought, but many media are developing and sending direct articles to pages without filters before the publication begins.

There are 20 viruses associated with respiratory infections around the world. Perhaps the Chinese coronary will become twenty-one, not more or less serious, will probably disappear instantly or eventually, perhaps remain limited to a specific eco-system, such as the Saudi Arabia (KETS).