I refuse to be slaughtered!

Pardje, a journalist from Tetovo, had demanded a massacre for us working in Periscope (plus for journalists of another portal).

With insults and inadequacy, he called us "gazaeparuca," a link that suggests that we are even sold. He wanted us to be killed because of the dysfunctional justice which, according to him, would punish us for slander. You suck, I kill you! That's what he said. Yet, there were people like Nezir Kraki, who tried to justify it. Why? Because the disliker who sought slaughter was realized in comments. And even Kraki, like so many others, doesn't seem to have intersigned any values he and the group mentioned sell farts all day long. It's hard to live with principles in your daily life. Get rid of the oppressive elements. You can see yourself as shit. And then, to attack people at the bottom of the well on this job market.

But what we had invented, a god knows! The journalist in question had distributed with the text a news story of another portal, which was certainly biased and unacceptable.

I don't want to, and I can't protect journalism from portals. Not even at the portal where I work. There are many flaws. Poor financial tax, intensive work, and disorganized editors. But who are the editors? Readers. Portal is business commercializing news. This is not the discovery made in Kosovo. Application becomes the most important criterion for the evaluation and writing of an article.

Suppose you translate a good article from an international media medium or do an analytical research on August's administrative guidelines, but when you enter an alletin showing how many people read it, you despair! I'll whisper to myself. Even those who keep themselves up-to-dates are completely disinterested in container articles and very interested in provocative articles! They love these articles even to give the bark of their egos, to be reviled afterward! The terrible hypocrisy! And We see what these people read. Every day We overlook the hypocrisy. Readers rock that journalist knows what he clicks and reads. What he wants to read which is in drastic dissonance with what he claims to be seeking to read!

Are we sold? Inside the portal are people with different political attitudes. There are people without political conviction. There is a good working atmosphere. We're all a little tired, we want to engage more strictly. But we're blind. Our editors, meaning readers, have bound us to the shackles of their desires. To do something seriously quality took a long time, which is a luxury of newspapers that receive donations or are truly sold.

As far as political beliefs are concerned, I myself am an associate against power. I'm incompatible against changing borders. I'm glad I refused to work for power at three times my salary at the portal. I supported Albin Kurt during the time of the split-up Vetevendosje Movement. Open up even. And today I know if I've done well since the diskours and the ban on legalization didn't happen within that party that offered hope for me personally that better days would come. Even for many relatives, unemployed, or slave labor. For 190 euros one works at a company that forces him to work up to 12 hours a day.

Anyway, I refuse to be dignified since I did and I'm doing nothing wrong. I refuse even to get slaughtered! Not exactly! And I also don't take moral lectures from people who get three times their salary, which are a hundredfold less printed than me! From people who slander others. That with the lazy minds and bitter mouths, the male desires reveal.

In addition, being uncritical in a political arm makes you a Mexican being. Although you are lined up against power, you are not mean that you are not mean - that you are not wicked and lazy. Even if you're uncritically lined up against power, except with frustration, that makes you suspicious! What if you're there, unless you had a place in the giant, corrupt production scheme that he built power? What if you are against them, although you have been weak even to be with them and to take advantage of them? So, if you were a weaker servile between the other servile?

My conviction is that the villain may even become a man of good heart but who is lazy to confirm data and lazy to think. I naively believe in the ethical rationalism of Socrates! But invisibility is a good weapon at times against a harrowing reality! The root at its core is the rebel's weapon. And to him who accepts what the kingdom has declared to be the truth and the sure reality.

Do not read the things you claim you do not read! Don't click them! In the meantime, try to seriously read what you claim to read. Thus, quality would rise!

Online newspapers (with the exception of millions of incomes) cannot change. If they try, they'll close. And journalists would be slaughtered in the daily rate of unemployment as they are being slaughtered by the way you're committing it.

But we don't deserve to be slaughtered. We (are putting myself in here when I'm not a journalist) deserve more fulfilling work!