Left out of “

Fashion. That is the word that describes the driver of the ideological definition of political parties in Kosovo. Immediately after the war, the fashions were right and as a party with such definitions declared all that mattered at the time: The LDK, the PDK, the AAK, and then the LDD with the AKR. So, we had a wide right. But their political programmes were at odds with the country's social structure. This structure made it impossible to ignore poverty, or the interests of the poor. All parties mentioned above, though right, actually acted like left. And the first three currently have much stronger ties to the poor class than the parties declared left. Could you ignore 70 percent of the poor electorate? Of course not. The idea of Shpend Ahmeti saying that “is not necessary to look poor to represent their interests” were in mind two decades ago the leaders of the right parties. They also stripped off the clothing of poverty.

Lumir Abdixhiku, before entering the LDK, said there was no rightist party in Kosovo [that means, neither the LDK was like that]. Fair enough! Everyone's left and they're all basically corrupt! Whether at a declaration level or in the content of political activity or in class circumstances and their lifestyle.

Change of fashion. In 2014, the Vetevendosje Movement made it a great ideological prospect when it broke free from attitudes to destroy the system by saying through Albin Kurti's mouth that he believed in free market. It passed from the utopia that had cultivated over a decade to a declared competitive left. After Vetevendosje, both the Initiative and the Social Democrat Party were declared on the left. Rule number. Kosovo is moving from right to left but only to aesthetic level. Because Kosovo could only be the cause of social structure, and corrupt cause of the family and tribal culture of society.

First, there was a mute left left, taking a left, flowing from the poor layer, representing the interests of this layer. And then the corruption of the left widened when it became declarative but where you had to dress and then get stripped of the clothing of poverty.

The PDK, the LDK and the AAK, as they ran from the poor layer or at least the base of membership, had to be worn as rich. They realized from the beginning that poverty is the cause of the situation in which it is located, that it is inter-internized inferiority and takes the man dressed as rich rather than the one dressed like it.

Vetevendosje and PSD do not stem from the poor layer, nor is its membership base not from this layer therefore, they had/need to dress/vise as poor in order to identify themselves with it. Shpend Ahmeti's stuttering represents only a breakthrough showing that this manipulative strategy has failed. Let's get dressed like we are, let's get wet as we know, let's take these masks off, and let's make more do”. Those words were understood by him.

Being in opposition, Vetevendosje has had the meal to invest extremely much in its images. She's dirty, she's shaped a little urban, sometimes dressed red and sometimes dressed like poor. It wouldn't be any big harm if it didn't forget that people exist beyond media platforms, beyond Facebook and television. She forgot to cultivate strong ties, from the roots, to the working class and the poor of the country being overly focused on the representative/representative level. The political platform presented by Albin Kurti also makes a harsh overlapping of society through its activists. The latter should spend more time with the poor in society than with each other said on Kurt's platform. Vetevendosje's conservative political action was empty. She escaped into the discour of romantic nationalism, unable to attract mass by any other means. She simply carried out the discurs of Movement, seeking to provoke civil revolt. And he did that, only on nationalist topics. She forgot that she was using prolonged citizen bitterness toward corrupt governments.

Vetevendosje was profiled as left in view of the inefficiency of the social policies of the parties that government. But not by challenging their ideological orientation. Therefore, steps it says will take to increase the functionality of state mechanisms are not taken seriously by the country's citizens. That's because this requires very large quartials and capacities. This does not happen only through good will. Through the statement. In an unqualified society, it is difficult to implement different social policies with full efficiency. Vetevendosje, has marginalised its economic programme in progress at the expense of its nationalist programme. This is expected to be done by the PSD, which has never shown where conceptual differences lie with Vetevendosje. Even the PSD seeks political referendum, meaning the Union with Albania, for a society that simply requires better economic prospects.

To look poor only to manipulate their will constitutes a corruption in itself. The appearance of the poor, however, is not summed up only in clothing. It is also expressed in life - style. And such an esthetic sharing with the poor, before PSD did, did. LDK.

The declared leftist parties would have to sever the PDK's corrupt ties with the poor layer and cultivate healthier ties with it. But it cannot be done in political parties that have accepted aesthetic manipulations, that are dressed poor for stealing the voice from the latter, nor those who do not accept what seems to be poor in the environments where they stand.

Yes, we can overturn Ahmet's statement: Is it possible to look poor and stay with the PSD chairman, The PDK or LDK in any Yaht, or any other luxury place? Or, in short: Is it possible to be poor and speak for yourself, to represent your own rights?