Demach and cillation down and down

Adem Demach today became 82 years old. I don't believe that much about birthdays because they give importance to a biological event that erodes individualizations. One might say that each one has a birthday, even serving as an identifying element in our IDs. As an initial saving measure from others. True, but it's just an administrative measure that's targeting our administration. Recognition and grouping. Entering statistics. Prevention of crime. And more. The biological birth is not done by our own will, and so if we consider it important, we misjudge the initial promises of what we want to be.

And the birth event is not important. Especially if it is reflected in religious views where life is viewed as sacred, extraordinary. And that makes suicide worse. And the fate of the born is incompatible with that of the children and parents. A permanent debt to them is represented. Because this biological birth provides inexorable importance.

Life is basically tragic. The individual from his biological birth act has been violated because he is in want of life. So I'm against birthdays. And [conventional] parents.

Anyway, this time we're talking about Demach. A very important personality whose birthday, although referring to a biological event, is a social event, even cultural and political. But stop at this point again. Why does a biological event of an important personality become a social and cultural event? This is because a biological, organic thread is thought of in the person in question, from which all the other feats flow. This leads to the idea that if someone's good, it's good, if someone's bad, it's bad. In Demach's case, there is a large part of the people who label all his activity on one side and another on the other, who do not hesitate to demonstrate the cause of some of his actions [to catch up, harsh criticism against Rugova or the idea of the Balkans, or even his geopatriotism when after the war sought to protect Serbs and other minorities from his furious Albanians].

Demach, like no other, can't be seen from this simplistic point of view. We can talk about his actions, but not making a constant reference to him as an employee.

If his 82 years of life are brought back, number 28. 28 years he lived in prison. And here comes the people's sympathy for his picture. Perhaps his personality birth took place right in prison. In the big number of years he spent there.

But return to people's sympathy. Such sympathy is mixed with some regrets. In fact, this in society has been carried to state institutions that had long before decided to repay money to all those who had suffered in prisons during Yugoslavia. Demach had received about 200 thousand euros, thus revulsing his work.

But what is this regret over the suffering in prison? Ironically, a sentence used irreversibly by Adam Demach, the man of 28 years in prison, may illustrate the answer a little bit: “they go up and down, side-by-side”. Demach doesn't like it when people get down and down, side by side, but society does. The meaning of freedom that is changed in our society, as I believe, has witnessed in the last two decades, lies in that unbridled and meaningless conduct.

States are conditioned so that stops have a key role. It could be different. Unless we believe in chaos, in everyone's war against everyone, or in an organicly good human nature. Therefore, prisons are an essential part of the states. But the evil of prisons lies in the other country that oversees you, controls, instructs, and forbids you. And that's exactly what I want to tell you: Kosovo society cannot grasp the basic evil of prison: the other. And that's why prison only sees it as a treadmill. Even the Yugoslav oppression [Serbian] essentially viewed it as only a halt to the operation/srolling] in question.

This society itself makes daily the request that people be nothing more than people. To exercise everything else superficially, except for being human. What is this man? We said it: one thing, one unclean, one corrupt by one's worthiness.

People need [incident] prisons in order to form. Not to be a uniform. To avoid becoming provincial agents, harsh ideas, secularized cultural balances, and so that they do not wander blindly. They need prisons that they build themselves but that they control even more strictly than government - paid guards. So they need discipline.

People have to sacrifice that stupid shit down and down in order to give birth to themselves and make life happen. In order to contain instincts, they are bound by their habits and set high self - requirements.

It seems to me that in the social perception of Demach's imprisonment, there is an opinion of the President or the case. Demasch was unfortunate, so he was imprisoned. Or, there is a state demonstration [ The former Yugoslavia, to which a great severity is attributed. I think prison was Demach's conscious act. A country whose order you try to overthrow, puts you in jail. Demas realized this. So, prison was his work, and that's why in his tongue the going down and up, side-by-side, knee-aney” is seen with so much contempt.

I just have sympathy for Demach. Not pity. I'm sorry, and I'm sorry, only for those people who weren't and who are willing to get into any prison. Never for anything. They've dedicated the useless tool we talked about.

The older people, the prison dendis company, Nietzsche said. Right!