Western Errors in underdeveloped Countries

The historical roots of these conflicts are sown by European settlers who exploited the natural resources of third world countries. The West has had and continues to have an important role in the configuration of the world's political map.

After World War II, major powers designed a world where political and ethnic boundaries did not match in many cases. The international conferences, led by the top states of the West, supported the creation of Yugoslavia, a conglomerate of ethnicities and different religions. While in Palestine, they assisted the creation of the state of Israel, not taking into account the ethnic, cultural and sociological realities of the problem. Colonization nations relied on their claims to continue maintaining their colonies. So the seeds of conflict were sown throughout most of the globe.

When the decolonialism process became inevitable, opportunities to defuse tensions across the third world were exhausted. Colonial powers and international law recognised the right of the self - determination of colonised peoples, but the borders that were accepted leave open the possibility of internal conflicts “ ” in already independent states resulting from decolonisation. Without analyzing the situation, without counting on the ethno-religious feelings, the internal administrative boundaries, or intermediate external borders, were recognized as external political boundaries regardless of whether or against the verdicts, thus creating ethnically and religiously mixed states in which competitions to take over resources would become hot, even in bloody conflicts. It was these state-run conflicts that would have warranted “interventions of Western countries through the International Organisations run through these states to help solve conflicts and create central governments.

Nevertheless, the ongoing sunset, in many cases, has supported corrupt governments and sometimes even oppressive regimes if the latter have agreed to the dictates of Westerners. Benazir Bhutto even openly condemns the Western strategy of helping the government gain access to its decisions, especially regarding natural resources. She takes the example of her country, Pakistan, to elaborize the neocolonization that is being done to poor countries for the welfare of the people rich for the Western-based natural resources.

As a result, we have super-rich politicians and people living in poverty, and for this, there are many examples; Pakistan, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Kosovo, Sierra Leone, African countries, Libya, Yemen, Iraq and so on. On the other hand, if a national government has not been installed against the US or European countries, then sanctions are initiated (Equadori, Iraq, Venezuela, Cuba and so forth), civil conflicts (Libia, Syria) that need an attorney with authority, usually the US, to solve them, or the country “produces weapons of mass destruction” that would make the US intervention of the UN Do wants to preserve peace in the world. The U.S. intervention allows for the installation of a government that gives free rein to American or European Coropours. So US goals remain suspicious.

In the past, we were affected by the global economic, political and recent religious crises. No further than 2-3 years ago, all attention focused on I The SIS, as a military formation where it first seemed to create the impression that a group of warriors who want to revive the Islamic dogma to enforce the law of maturity as a kind of constitution throughout the Middle East has indeed been created.

However, the present - day circumstances this military group is going through give us a completely different picture of what was previously perceived.

Numerous authors confirm that sometimes American intelligent services have intervened to create such groups to keep its global expansionist interests alive. For example, Reagan had reportedly created present - day muhahideins to fight the Soviet Union at that time. Furthermore, renowned scholar William Blum says that “at the end of the 1980s, the Government of Kabul announced that during the fighting some Americans were killed and, in 1985, an English newspaper reported that there were about two dozen American Muslims in Afghanistan to fight the muhaedins at a jihad that, according to the fundamental Koran principles, all faithful to Islam must once make it <x1.

To follow further, but by quoting another author, to follow the topic that Americans have had clear intentions of forming an Islamist army, it is also noteworthy to Weiner who says that the president (in this case refers to Eisenhower) said he wanted to promote the idea of an Islamic jihad against atheistic communism. “We must do everything possible to highlight the aspect of the holy “war “””, he said at a meeting at the White House during September 1957. ”

All those riots caused by the military group I The SIS has not been more than secretly absorbed construction by American intelligence services in order to destabilise the destructive part of the Middle East. The fact that in my ranks SIS has not only had members of an ethnicity and citizenship, it means Afghans or Iraqis, though not even Arabs, but also members of German, English, French, Swedish, Egyptian, Turkish citizenship. So, alluding to these sources of evidence from many international media reports, it turns out that the war of I SIS is not an ideological fight, but a political struggle built according to American expansionist policies. Even today, we are witnesses of an unprecedented genocide that is taking place in Burma where Buddhist groups kill hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians of Muslim faith, with regard to anything. The SIS or other Muslim military groups silence him by not helping the Roingya people with whom they share the same religious trust. What does this say - political or ideological warfare?

Today, when it comes to Syria, and when many reports of international organizations say that the extinction of I The SIS and other terrorist groups are towards the final end, America is unable to intervene in this country with the ease it had in Afghanistan or Iraq years ago, as there is Russia as a serious contender. This suggests that the purpose of these two Great Powers is to completely cleanse this Muslim country until an agreement is reached between them to bring residents of another ethnicity, then to make Syria habitable. Just to create a hybrid identity. So that every individual who lives in this country can act on the basis of providing an existential life by exploiting the resources of that country, but not having a historical connection with that country.

Through the neocapitalist occupation, America and Russia attempt to reject the ethnic element, keeping these people poor but once helping the rulers of underdeveloped countries to bring them endless privileges to stay longer in leadership.

A critical author of American neoliberalism, Naomi Klein, says that neoliberalism has often been described as an ideology and practice of second colonial robbery. In the first robbery, the property that was robbed was mostly land, while in the second, these assets were robbed of the state by companies and production entities. So, running over this maximum, the two imperial superpowers demand at any cost that third world citizens strip from public, knock collective thought and turn it into an individual monstrum to serve their collapses.

Continuing on to another argument that Klein throws into her book FOK Doctrine, she says “Saddam had never presented any threat to the U.S., but he had posed a threat to the American Energy Corporation after signing a contracting agreement with a Russian energy giant, and had entered into talks with the French company Frances Totaleen, leaving American and British firms to finger in the mouth, while these very Ango-American firms had under control a third of the world's oil reserves. ”

The Balkans are also suffering from internal tensions. Republika Srpska, Presevo Valley, Western Macedonia, northern Kosovo, are just some of the points where ethnic nationalism thrives. Borders in the Balkans were established ignoring the ethnic element, so Balkan peoples are failing to decompose a form of constitutional patriotism, nor to create citizens' states, nor to build a solid economy.

The rotten political classes, which are being backed up from the West, are not interested in resolving ethnic tensions, as they exploit them to distract attention from the economic and social problems facing people. The idea of putting peace ahead of freedom is wrong. The Western formula for establishing incriminating governments, which through blackmail can easily control, has produced a serious economic situation, a permanent civilian tension accompanied by the economics of politicians.

The companies remain to vote down the old guard of controversial politicians to replace him with responsible politicians, without a criminal pass, which cannot be blackmailed by the International Community.

So the West won't use the bat anymore, but I'll try to see through the reward, make pressure on the government. The delay in making a change is the delay in building a welfare state. The decision, if not fully, to a considerable extent, is in our hands.

Agron Kelmendi