Miladin Popovqi's Restitution

Let us return to your abuse of Plato. At one point you say: “Being shade is not bad” True Plato says exactly the opposite: the “shadowing is bad”, because the shadow world is the cave world, and the cave world is the world of ignorance and fools. Plato's entire philosophy is trying to get the man out of the shadow world, but that's why Elvis Hoxha won't get out of this world, because being a shadow, so being stupid, according to him, is good.

Dude Elvis, I was on the street when a friend called and informed me that you've been reacting to my last text. After I finished the work I was going to go back to, I was thinking that maybe this time you've managed to get out of the Batak of the rumor that you're trying, now and many days, to grace it with philosophical clothing, but that, unfortunately, instead of disfigured it.

The Antiplatonic Happiness of Stupidness

Nietzsche puts it beautifully: “When trying to hide a mistake, you owe ten more mistakes”. What you've done in your last writing is precisely a statement of that Nietzsche thought. You try to hide the philosophical and logical mistake of starting your opinion by the rumor, hiding your head in the castle of Aristotle's sylologism, but Aristotle cannot help you. Lucky for you 137 of his sylologs are against your way of thinking. Just read one phrase of yours to see how bad your opinion is with Aristotle's logic. Invited me to read Aristotlen sylologs you speak to me “about the degrees of the beauty of his syology”. Are you aware of what you're saying? What does the beauty category require in the logical dynamics of seismisms? Beautiful is the category of aesthetics, not logic. Aristotle's logic has to do with the variety of thought, not his beauty, because Aristotle is not stupid, like you, to confuse perception with thought, aesthetic to logic. At some point you try to win Aristotle by warning me that I'm not careful about “minding the greatest intellects in human history” Once again I miss it, because through this term “intellect” shows only the hopeless wanderings of your thinking to understand something of value from Plato and Aristotle's philosophy.

Plato and much later Kanti and Hegel stood out between reason and mind, and you in your desperate attempt to capture this distinction creates the surveillance of intellect, with what suggests that there is also an unintelligent mind, such as suppose, there may be inhuman thinking, unembodied emotion, uncircular emotion, or other similar folly. In this way, by trying to escape through Aristotle, you commit the greatest sin against him: break Aristotle's fundamental laws of logic, the laws of identity, and that of contradiction. At this moment your thought collapses.

By breaking your neck from one philosopher's insensibleness to another's understanding, you go through all your sysific torment. Here are some of these hugs: In a hurry to collect meaningless phrases to give some poor blow, Olympia is confused with Mount Sizifi, a mistake that even beginners do not make in recognising Greek mythology. Furthermore: it presents Plato as Partisan of the participation of measures in politics. One thing is certain and there are no serious scholars of philosophy that does not say that if Plato were Partizan of the participation of the masses in political decision making, he would never have written his Republic. Your views on the Socrates Court are so banal that I feel pity for you. Give up the bauduan bullshit and take Leo Strauss to understand the trial of Socrates, the conflict of philosophy with the crowds of the city and Plato's revenge against them in his Republic. Although I give you this advice, I still doubt that you will follow it. The reason is very simple: Leo Strauss is not the left philosopher and as such is not valid within your flock led by shepherd Badious, who in a recent book tells us openly, from the front page, that the only important philosopher of our time is Mao Ce Duni.

Froyd explains that the human personality is determined by childhood dramas and one of your childhood dramas, Comrade Elvis, was also the Chinese revolution of Mao Ce Dune applied to Albania by Uncle Enver, so your love of the Badio mouse is not only philosophical and ideological love, but also Frodiaan. The old song the Rapods of the North were singing in honor of the Chinese revolution applied in Albania must have been deeply embedded in your unconsciousness. If I'm wrong, correct me. The song said kind of like this: Two lions are the world, one Asia and one Europe, Mao Ce Duni and Enver Hoxha. Mao Ce Dunn, as world lions, nestled in your unconsciousness, you have now rediscovered him to Badio, who also considers Mao Ce Dunn to be a lion of the world, even the greatest lion of philosophical thought.

As for Uncle Enver and your report with him, I'll be back to the bottom of this letter.

As a philosopher and political adviser, I can help you overcome your political and ideological dramas, but as a psychiatrist, I can't help you because the medical techniques of psychinalism don't. As a Frankophone you might be able to consult with a localist whose theories today require salvation by many unspoiled Marxists.

But back to your abuse of Plato. At one point you say:“Being a shadow is not bad” True Plato says exactly the opposite: the “shadowing is bad”, because the shadow world is the cave world, and the cave world is the world of ignorance and fools. Plato's entire philosophy is trying to get the man out of the shadow world, but that's why Elvis Hoxha won't get out of this world, because being a shadow, so being stupid, according to him, is good.

Peter Sloterdijk, the renowned German philosopher, says that the Platonic attempt to get man out of the shadow world is the foundation upon which the entire epistemological program of Western philosophy stands, and since you, Comrade Elvis, have failed to understand the basis of this program, it turns out you don't understand anything from all the philosophy. This is evidence of the Greek concept of truth. The Greeks say they didn't want the truth, but their discovery! How can you love the discovery of truth but not the truth as such? Say this sophism is few. No. This is total madness! Next: not “alithea”, but “alethea”. Alethea is the term of ancient Greek philosophy, which has its origin in Greek mythology. Alethea comes from the name of the mythologyic Lethe River, which separates the earth from the world and beyond the grave. He is the river of oblivion - the dead, passing through him, forget all that they have experienced on the earth. The English word “light” refers to an empty item that has no weight, substance. Its semantic proximity to Greek lethean is very clear. We should be proud, don't we, Comrade Elvis, of our beloved Albanian who preserved these philosophical treasures within her lexic. Of course not without consequences, for the Greek lethea, through the easyness of the Albanian language, has ended up in your folly.

Miladin Popovovici's return after 76 years

Now back to the part of our national history, that we tired readers of the problems of our philosophical workshop.

Since you've chosen cynicism to hit my political views and thus make room for your ideas and Vetevendosje to guide the historical fate of the people of Kosovo, and given your concept of the nation as transentental historical (still it is not said transentental, but transcendal), I will give you an answer to your transcendral role in our national history.

Elvis, we as Albanians are traditionally known for the secularist mentality. Our entire cultural history is filled with manifestations of this mentality. The main phrase, which from old times Albanians addressed to each other at random meetings, was “hello!”

It's a completely naked phrase from religious treaties. In the ancient medieval legend Constantine rises from the grave, not because this is sought by the almighty god, but because Constantine has left a hostage, an unscathed debt on earth, an unremitting promise. The idea is that the debts of this world must be repaid only in this world. The widespread statement that “nothing remains to be erased in the next world” is a folk conclusion of this idea.

Albania, fellow Elvis, has long carried over its shoulders a debt to Kosovo, and what appears to have now come a historic moment to pay off this debt.

76 years ago, at the order of the Moscow-based Communist International, the Yugoslav communists sent two Kosovo communists Miladin Popoviqi and Dusan Mugosha to Albania. Their mission was clear: Albania's communists, distributed in whom you know how many groups, tïi co-operate in a communist party and Albanians as a whole of thecanin in many groups. As stated at the end of Hollivood action movies: the mission accepted! What came next we all know: the communists won the undeclared civil war with the nationalists of Mitat Frasheri and Zogu legalists, then introduced the Stalinist dictatorship, while poor Kosovo returned to Serbia's power of Rankovikiqi, Tito's interior minister and the bloody UDB chief. This return was justified by the 1945 Prizren Conference criminal decision, through which Kosovo communists, without asking the people of Kosovo, on his behalf, decided Kosovo's reunification with Serbia, whose reunification we still have very big problems today.

76 years later, our dear Albania is returning our historic debt: that as the equivalent of Miladin Popovovich and Dusan Mugoza sends Elvis Hodza and Boike Abaz. The mission again is international: to unite Kosovo's communists around the new Enver, while the rest of us we think otherwise should agree to share the fate of the Ballists, co-organists, reactions, who knows who else.

Since we are talking in terms of historical metaphysics, then we can say that maybe it was foretold for me to experience the fate of my uncle, Emin Latif, who was killed 72 years ago fighting alongside Shaban Poluzhae surrounded by the partisan brigades of Miladin Popovovich and Enver Hoxha. Who knows? Nietzsche invites us to believe in the permanent return of the same, right?

But let us not lose the beginning of the restored debt.

Of course in this historic exchange of shipments there is a difference: the 1941 ideological shipment from Kosovo to Albania was tragic, while today's ideological shipment from Albania to Kosovo is farce. But as I said in my preliminary writing, we need to be careful because the dialectic link between these two forms of drama can create the situation when not only tragedy repeats itself in the shape of the farce but also the farce can end in tragedy.

We have to remain in hope that even this time the laws of dialectic materialism will fail, and Elvis will not have the success and fate of Miladin Popovic.