For Latif the ignorant commissioner

Latif, after how many years you've been listening to the students. Good news if we could call it an answer. That's because for 10 years when I met you at the UP, it was just a shadowy and militant who entered the hall scraping boots like you were part of a military parade, not a professor of philosophy. Of course, without paraphrasing names, not out of respect, but from its very opposite - hatred of the student who does not exist as a subject to you. So, Latif, start <x0-letter” not replica. Of course, not from those letters of soft or desperate language to yourself, usually sharing trouble with the other person or otherwise, but from “L<x3 - postal letter, which teaches to hold you back as if the mailmen brought a letter you didn't expect.

There are only three differences here: postal letters, no matter how many commissioners they had been addressed and receptive, and your letter doesn't have the name of the receiver; your delivery is electronic through the manager of the expess page, buzhala, and your letter is a public letter. The need it carries, its publication and publicity does not mean the correctness of a bold public advertising, but the insult the opening scandal of a letter full of pantronism and frustration. Scandalizing that contempt that posts like your office and the bodhala office, like a disgusting powder post that are like whenever they have addresses. There's only you and your helmet in the house. From here on, the interlocutor/computer for you doesn't exist. The student for you and most of the professors at the UP is more of an anonymous coming to attract extracts like you pull from the municipality you belong to.

About 100 years after the “Procesi” of Kafkas, and almost half a century after the best films came up against the bureaucracy ? Among them is the Russian film “Zamri Voszeni Voszeni” of Vitaly Cavensky ], in which, unless they're so powerfully visualized, there's also a shooting scene for me, for me, as the hope of a knocker at the door of a Repulinist for performing work other than by starting to dance (knows from the office that you're still looking at something like an interoperal, or an interopciplinary, through this conversational behavior.

As a result, you're the student's no longer living in a university room, but he doesn't exist outside. There is a “somebody” who is expected to receive the message. Nor is University a Universe. On the contrary. It's a jar of your Homies. It's where you left without any grounds loyal Dom. For you students are someone who consumed “ideology over the longer term”, and the environmental climate from which to start the letter, the place where Pacolli's MABETEX no longer than 7-8 years ago introduced the <x4-Fifts for professors”, does not represent the expired. If he had started a replica instead of a commissioner's letter, maybe I would have wanted to deal with every line you wrote. But since you don't do that, I just need to deal with some of your banals.

At the top of the script, you say <x0 selectors today in Kosovo every day buy expired products and thus daily endanger their lives of children and their families” while below “The Social Democracy means you promise young people capitalism with human face, not equality after the blood washing of the road”. With what you say you accept the power of the state in the face of capital. How it was that in a situation where enough of this capitalization of “Kosovo poor “capitalism (another definition or frodiaic slide of yours) you risk people's lives daily, until even children are required capitalism with human face, there is only you, Latif knows. Touch or don't touch the hand of the state to sanctify them on these brands, or are they actually the ones who are Sun-Wann to us?

So even Kosovo poor country, and its capitalism with brands that kill our children, and require capitalism with human faces! Bravo! Kamy would also covet such a seismic readiness, which is nothing more than a certain request of a privileged man to silence the poor <x0) minus” that he left behind in wealth, entertainment, and social status. Keep quiet, they're fine.

Kosovo calls it desolate not because the human party you advise and dedisited there, but why some dual society members “Marx ednak” and revolution, and the cassodial saws even in a paradox of its own kind: trying to detect not only the orientation of people's discontent within poor Kosovo but also to dictate the directions of European philosophy: any French philosophy to the left is condemned by the poor Kosovo Latif Friedman. This reminds me of a folk wisdom: “mos measure itself in shade to shabah!” But you, Latif, not only do you measure yourself in the shade of asabah, but you live in it thanks to my brother's jar with power structures on the run.

You do incubate incriminating the entire left history by reducing it only to Marx, Grams and others. Ignoring history, philosopher Latif sinks into paradoxes and ignorance that cannot be rescued. The message is self-intelligible: Marks = Stalin, Enver Hoxha, Cardel. What an idiotism of the most vulgar kind. Latif, is evidence that he does not take from political history, respectively, from social movements when he identifies his left hand exclusively with Marx, respectively, when he reduces it to XX century residential regimes. Latif, to spot Marks in Russia why he had Stalin in China Mao, or in Albania Enver, it's the same as lynching Tolstolin for coming from an aristocratic family of Romanov's times.

Latif, the liberalization itself was born as a left. The Protestant movement itself, the Calvinist movement, and all that marked the opposite bowl with Claire/Kisha (inevidently looking at Christianism in the first place) was left, since it began as a bookatory movement. Name Grams, but not his prisoner Mussol. Symptomatic, right? I deliberately put in the parenthesis the apricotation of maytism with Christianism, as there are also many examples of attempts to reconcile Jesus' message with Marks', and nothing further than Tolstoji. Now how do we deal with him? Put it in what mold?

The French Revolution itself, from which all the social-political operating concepts emerged, was left. About half of the “Communist manifest” is a credit to the debt because Marks on the journey of “human labor development” in capitalism saw deliberate pressures and deliberate shortcomings of the coming of equality, but he didn't curse why he was born. Where Marks filled this journey was the spectacular failure of capitalism to ensure the economic well - being for man, that is, equality so disgusting to Latif. The LVV is not that it does neither more nor less than demand for justice first and then equality. Marks and Engels didn't even expect their teachings to be applied in a country like Russia, but not to mention it here that Engels people of the Balkans called “aherical people”, and the theoretical identification of an out-of-the-Western move with Marxist teachings did not warrant the historical and social substratorts as such as in your world. LVV has had no reference from the first day of his birth to Enver Hoxha's bureaus or Cardel.

Only the birth of the depressive regimes and even the murderous regimes that misused these teachings empowered the disks of a non-Western Liberal European “under the framework of a Communist “Landition”, say Marks and Engels acted at the Vldivostok, as if only Mao's Stalin killed, or as if the communist regime only had “Landhe” And just catching the whole globe from the modern world explanation made other people have the luxury of attitude and application ALL modern ideology. So even today everyone feels and has the right to feel free to at least prove all the ideologies that come out of the French Revolution.

Below, you try to find inconsistencies in the programatic VV brochures and prevent the use of the population term. Why do you turn to a citizen differently? With what? What's wrong with calling Kosovo Albanians more than they are? It is not modern popular criticism that helps. Help you in Trump's case, not in the Kosovo context. You can say that the Vetevendosje Movement makes a logical mistake when a crowd of millions of people organized into family stages call it a people. Even that is advisable to say in full because a social/political movement cannot require logical consistency or tautology. Calling to the people in an unspoiled country, naturally filtered out by Shovenymas, racisms and discrimination cannot be over-reached. Or is it that the People's Partys in Europe must always be overcome, always started according to the Latifian vision of the world?

You tell us that Kosovo's <x0-state is the product of a long national movement”. Not Latif. This is neither historically nor socially supported. That's why I have no doubt. Kosovo Albanians could say they fought for liberation by paying for it even with disabilities and lives of resistance, it could be said that they had legal and illegal episode movements, but that did not rule out that we had state-building potential. Even Kurds have been killed with gas by Saddam, but the leader of the Kurdish lilip-state north of Iraq is a tribal shitbag similar to your gangs. Resistance came from oppression, but never knowing what freedom, state, Republic of Emancipation really are.

Not by chance, the LDK sought external assistance, not self-realization; not by chance, masso required rescue, not liberation. Not by chance W The CK wasn't even joined by 1% of the population, despite what you did to 50 thousand veterans, am I wrong, Latif? That was as powerless as inefficiency and inefficiency; as in ignorance and fear, as in coexistence and voluntary reconciliation with Yugoslavia and Serbia, so much so that being divided. I know this hurts, but what you do.

Kingly tales of how the KLA is conceived with Ibrahim Rugova and Fehmi Agani; how they fill each other up; how the LDK is the continuation of the USH, they are idiots' buttons in history. Don't tell me now that Kosovo from March 17th 2004 to February 10, 2008 (3 years and eleven months), has been astronomically emancipated and has declared independence! You know better than me, that's funny. The declaration of independence came from the recent and not least surprising changes in global order, dictated mostly by the United States.

Taking for the basis of the finality of something as a basis for both the beginning and the constant succession of finality with determinance, without your evil, in the philosophy of Science, is known as the navigational error (vigism) Latif.

Even because army failure accuses LVV, not the elected president smuggling. It's the VV that supported that Latif initiative, but you and the smuggled president were kidnapped after about 72 hours.

You mentioned “salafism”, without ever asking why the removal of a country into such ideologies can't be looked at historically? Do we have the luxury of talking about our Kosovo as a state that has a centuries-old history subs. Before all, does man precede the state or the state of man? Didn't we just get five systems from 89th Latif? Yugoslavia, Milosevic's RRF with peaceful “resistance” , UNMIK, supervised independence and what do we enjoy today? Have we not experienced five exchanges of identification documents (for paradoxicity we can still travel without visas to the continent that you detect philosophy!), five times systemic and conceptual shakers of the world's explanations, five times spiritual shocks in less than 28 years, never to be able to defeat even the ones we want to get started the speed of changes we were served.

Is it not logical that from such shocks, people feel empty because not everyone has your privileges? According to you, the state as an abstract entity precedes man. Let's dance in theorists from Josip Brozi to the posmoder, no problem, that's normal, but the guilty are the ignorant people! What time did we have the opportunity to put the debate on religion, secularism, secularism, tradition, modernity in us? When did you leave? Never. Checked the media, checked public life.

But lucky for this place, you'll soon be out of your way. We'll get rid of you and the other commissioners. I assure you.