Brian, you don't like reading.

Oh full shopping, but full of shit doesn't know what. I thought you'd add some accuracy to the thought in this replica. But in the title, you say something stupid, if it's the newspaper's editorial that's got a title like this. What's Milosevic's lawyer, maybe you said it and I didn't get it? What is it, Brian? I don't tell you dear Brian because, as I said before, words aren't empty out of sense of feeling. I can't tell you either the dear “” or the honored “”.
I understood your hatred for Badiu, and Plato, and Deleuze. The first because he is a Maoist, because he has been against Nato's intervention in Kosovo. The second because it's <x0...proto communist”, the third because, as you fuck up, but so lamely, you talk about the rhyzoma you don't know about and you don't understand anything, it's the way you write about it. My friends told me talking to you is impossible because you only use Google. I'm seeing this clearly in your last text. After you've put away no philosophical phrases of thought, not sinking, not deciding, you go and use Roger Scruton.
Well, I told you once that it helps after I get rid of reading many of the high names of philosophy, even literature. But if you read Roger Scruton correctly, you might have read much more philosophy. But one thing I don't understand at all: how can you mention Hegel, when he is this very philosopher, really great for me, who has put us on the list of past peoples? I'm not like you to account for Hegel. I'm sure you haven't read the Phenomenology of the spirit, because you'd be out of breath when you learned that there's a violent show of divisions between historical and non-historic peoples. Well, philosophers like Badio and Hegel are very much influenced by the visible existence of peoples in history, even though Badio tries to somehow cover up this relationship with Hegel.
I'd be fair if by philosophical behavior you would address my concern about how a philosopher loses sensitivity to the fates of a people. But you're not serious and you can't stand lines that have to do with cultural, political, sociological and philosophical self-determination of a people, however small it was. And here lies the whole node of the philosophical indifference of the egocentric West towards us. Because, you say, Westerners are divided into many groups, but the two are the most interesting: experts and thinkers. Western experts want us not to be, while thinkers don't take into account because we're not. And here lies the goal and the practical action of what you call self-destruction, to be visible. And that was the most amazing of the KLA's vital practice, making us exist in the world, saving us from the human condition, try to reflect it a little, but not on Google.
If you and your boss can accept any negotiations, as all experts want, and for the sake of stability, thinkers don't recognize you anymore. Instead, they will see only Serbs exist, because they not only feel, raise their voices, but see them profit from accepting any demands Thaci makes on the table, when they take advantage of Petri's miserable being and the shitful laughter of Petri Selimi with Dacic (Don't forget the symbolic -- the son of Petr in the middle). Don't expect any thinker to think of our suffering when we pretend that we don't feel them and that we don't. It seems to me that the issue of Kosovo's raped women was removed from the strong men of the Kosovo Assembly. It seems to me that Albanian missing people disappeared second when they were not conditioned for negotiations with Serbia. It seems to me that Kosovo's assets and its recognition -- that is, its existence -- disappeared when, with the denial of the Albanian being in Kosovo's symbols, by Kosovo's own leadership, the Albanian name of suffering disappeared. As you say, you can't recommend Holocaust sons Carl Schmidt, I tell you, you can't bow before the Jasharai tombs and the Serbian <x0viktims. From then on, you are simply out of your mind, not in the opinion of any particular philosophy.
You're asking Badiu's account why he doesn't see you when you hide yourself. So, the government you advise has eliminated the appearance of Albanians in history. I can't ask Alain Badiou to love Kosovo as a historic people, when Kosovo institutions agreed that history begins in 1999 and that it is cut off through symbols from all the Albanian victims. So Kosovo symbols today cancel the sacrifice of Albanians. I know you'll remember that Badiu wrote in 1999, and that these institutions have done it later. But the historical theme of the peoples is not a matter of days. It is a matter of decades.
In spite of that, I translate Badio's philosophy because it's very useful in the order of thought, first I say we're in perspective and not in représentation, so we're not temporary product. NATO, but historical existence attack it in its terms. Second, I pronounce Badiu that those who don't know or discern, speak his philosophy, so next time, when the occasion comes, he dares not to consider them. Because Blerim, I've chosen the long way of establishing multiples of a people, don't be afraid of my most modest goal, and you're the short path of vice-making that wrecks feelings, people and riches. My long way is to establish a strong university, a broad knowledge, a fair society, a positive hope and a long-term will. But this rather modest mission is very simple when achieved by a large number, increasing the number of voters for the VV is the best example. So my purpose is really modest because we're too much.
Under the text, I confess another strategy: A place where there are libraries, theaters, theaters, houses with books on walls burn harder. Because philosophy will protect you, not as civil society, in the name of humanitarianism, but as political society, in the name of humanity. He protects you, not as a victim, but as a subject of right.
I'm just saying these and I know they're not actually looking for you. Like your handwriting that doesn't address me, but all the Pronto Clan clients who have had no hope or will, because otherwise they wouldn't ruin everything. You write, not out of concern for thought, but with opportunity to be as long as wessel's advisor.
So, Brian, if you want to be, you have to be, not hide. To refuse to be a <x009 loss stuck into the brain of the humane”, Migen says. Because the sting, this wonderful metaphor of the Migen, has the property of being in the human brain without even affecting the brain. The existence of this sting is just a nuisance, which the human brain owner seeks to get rid of. And this sting is a non-historic people. The victim of the love of others for stability. Experts ask: What can we do with this people? And thinkers don't know how to take this kind of people who are yours, a refugee people of their own land. So there is the Vetevendosje Movement! In the meantime, though, you act like you know something.
And it mentions Debré, which I am telling you to be honest, I've never read, because this man is a real problem, someone's doctorate thesis on this author. It is a real problem because it came to Kosovo, it was in Kosovo emptying, and just like the revisionists of the extermination camps, it denied crime in the most shameful way. And yet I repeat: the fault that we don't exist as a problem for the opinion of the West has the cause in the way we exist. We don't have a university, because we do college on top of your bosses. That's not what you're talking about. In your own way, you give thinkers their thoughts about us. The more you create Veselle, the more they will keep us from being historical.
Most of your text against Badious reading. As for Debra, I'll repeat. Even with a student's thesis on him, even with a completely lying and stupid title who puts on your writing. But if you remove those pieces of your text, as well as the stupidity on Deleuze, add them and the synopsis on Albin, your self-endation, etc., I don't really know what's left of your writing. Unless the difference between you and me: you who read a thinker not to read other thinkers about where you and Veselin érea and me, who read Deleuze, Foucault, Badio and Racineère, where they mix with the names of philosophers, writers, composers, musicians and characters, which read Leibniz, Cant and Plato, Berkeley and Hobbes, for they have not yet expired.
So we read one world where one hides, privatizes, and corrupts a people. The other, of course I am, where the world contains many characters that, as you know them, a people or societies share the historical name of the world. I'm not asking you to do like me. I had that request in my first letter. Then, as long as Plato or Kant failed to convince you to do so, I cannot convince you. I'm trying to show others that the thought is much broader than the one who manufactures cynicism to legitimize cynicism. I cannot ask you to write, as Badiu does, any work called Wessel, what is the name of the thing? Imagine that Wessel and Sarcozy are far away.
I recognized you, positively and not in your style, the criticism of Badiu's position in the Kosovo case. But that's where every person who learns to come in a ready existence. And that willing existence is not expected by a university student. Because he is more interested in understanding why the Germans chose Greece as the cradle of the West, why Badiu doesn't see us when we run at any cost after peace, why Kosovo institutions are afraid to express themselves to the unification of Albanians when they manage Albanians. You could ask a lot of questions in your text if you really wanted to address me. In this case, we would be honored colleagues. But you, as you write Wessel's caressings, just like a happy dog hoping to deserve his best pet.
So if you ever address me, please tell me something that builds thought. Don't you dare suggest I don't read Plato because he's proto-communist. Because then I realize that your college students are forbidden to read the first biggest treaty on political philosophy. The consequences would be catastrophic to you, because you wouldn't know how to reason on any relationship between philosophy and politics, from which you get the name philosophical adviser to the politician. Always expand the thought that every time you speak, you fall into a zone of thought. Otherwise, you will still write down the folly of being successful only with those who have decided not to read. That's a lot, maybe most. But with guys like you, they're gonna grow up and you're never going to be able to, in the privacy of the night, to congratulate yourself on why your readers have disappeared.
Still, I'm happy for you that Scruton doesn't know how you used him against Plato and defend Wessel.