Blerim Latifi's express thought

The entire text written by Blerim Latif stands in two lines: 1. In the metaphor of expired goods; 2. In reference to an expired political theory. Of course, Blerim Latifi is very concerned about the expired goods at the Kosovo market. With the haste of metaphor, so poor that it cannot be more than a comparison, he will punish for such an expiration and LV's ideas. But we find that, as a philosopher, he acts as a social activist, claiming that nothing has changed in public consumer goods trading rates since 1981, when Kosovo Albanians started eating out of expired goods. As a philosopher all the shit he wants to destroy the LV, but as a social activist, it's what he wants to protect.

Referring to activists Blerim Latifi, it would take the people to call themselves and go to court, or to bring down such wealthy merchants, but government bodies, even the government itself, for this danger in public health. But what he wants to do is prevent philosopher Latifi, who says that if the people take care of their own destiny, that's populism; that's how people get up to defend their own destiny, that's maoism, grammar, Chegevarism, Judaism. So philosopher Blerim Latifi puts the gobble on activist Blerim Latifi.

I'm taking advantage of the chance to tell you once again what's not a secret. I repeat the text taken from Latif in the LV statute. I'd like to repeat it because there's a meaningful text about democracy:

“Move V IT is political movement aimed at driving people into political decision-making through its organisation and mobilization. Movement V EVIDENCE is engaged in radical social and political changes, based on the principle of equality, democracy, political freedom and social justice of each citizen. Movement V ENVENTION! aims at a sovereign Kosovo -- a Kosovo -- which has control of its natural resources and enjoys the right to have an independent military force of itself, as well as a right to joining Albania. Movement V EVIDENCE! is aimed at a Kosovo where sovereignty stems from the will of the people who enjoy the right to internal and external self - determination so that the people will be free and unhindered in the organisation of social, political and economic life, according to their own” needs and interests.
Thanks to activist Latif for reading it. As for philosopher Blerim Latifi, the factoring of the people is an undemocratic horror. Democracy is not the power of the people. This idea has expired. The definition of democracy as such has expired. Lucy, then, philosopher Blerim Latifi finds another name for the system, whose philosopher is near Kadri Wessel. Based on this new name that will replace the expired term of democracy, his letter to students will be clearer. Perhaps a vicecratic would be a good system for him, where people should be excluded from any organization and mobilization in political decision making.
We realize that philosopher Latif loves politics, not as of the people, but as of Wessel. So we can give up the principle of equality, democracy, political freedom and social justice, because it's an expired principle... remember: like goods sold under Wessel's power. For Kosovo to be sovereign: having had control of its natural resources and finding the right to have an independent military force of its own, as well as the right to join Albania, this sovereignty is overrated. Sovereignty can be the right of Thaci and Wessel.

Just one example. Just read the beginning of the French Constitution, and if you have enjoyed Latif's theoretical density, you can quickly conclude that the French constitution is just as expired as the principles of LV. Anyone can try the same test with other European constitutions or states of America. Yet, there is no sad philosopher in these countries who so openly expresses his hatred of the human subject called the people.
Another explanation for philosopher Latif. When he next uses author Agamb, let him read it better, because this is the author who taught many LV people that under Thaci's regime they had nothing more to do with a normal state but with a state of emergency. I cannot say any more to him, for this man receives his wages as professor of philosophy but as an adviser to Wessel.
I'm going to let you down to a text that's broken down according to notions that create so many allergies to Blerim Latifi. Of course, it's worth anyone who doesn't recover for the students of Brian Latif.
O you who believe!
PRAMBUL French people solemnly state their relationship with human rights and with the principle of national sovereignty, such as defined by the Declaration of 1789, confirmed and fulfilled by the pre-fulfiling of the 1946 Constitution (usually there is an expiration date, but that does not create any problem with the French, as well as the duty rights (pass and duty?) (...) on the principle of free determination of the peoples, (...) new institutions founded on the common ideal of freedom, equality and the concept of their democratic development.

Article 1
France is the inseparable, secular, democratic and social Republic. It provides equality before the law of all citizens (taxia has not yet gone out of fashion)...
For Sovereignty
Article 2
The language of the Republic is French (Latif claims that people speak vice - speaking). The national emblem is the tricolor flag (not any flag that others have designed). The national anthem is Marseilles (not some pungent hymns and music that others have given them). The handover of the Republic is “Lyri, Equality, Brethren” (even though these terms have expired according to Human Latif)...

So Blerim Latifi, before addressing students, would do well to love philosophy for himself (so it would be self - determination, which he would not pay) and not for Wessel. That's the only way he'll get lucky if he's thinking rather than thinking experience.