Eddy Rama's aesthetic policy

Paradoxically interAlbanian responses to the manner of wearing Prime Minister Edi Rama's international halls and conferences reminded me of the ordinary and formal behavior of people. They feel comfortable even when they fail to understand the content, the substance of something that is questionable, but they do not have the nerve to explain it, so they are accommodated in the shed as simple as their thinking.

So, they ignore Eddie Rama's “objective of aesthetic demonstration” and get into what they can't even see in the Adidas in Rama!

Well, the whole world saw them; white, tricolored and then?

The taste placed in clothing and speeches manifests the essence of what a subject wants to broadcast to the world. In Rama's case: walking as a common bureaucratic, respecting the dull conventional rules of the ruling universe, or dressing up the way it feels comfortable, as a freeman, at the same time with the goal of saying hello to the world: that neither is the way people rule static, if it is to change. And Rama's message means this: In my country, yes, it must!

While the foreign media considered Rama as normal, or by the Euro-center symptoms of the type: “ja, now the Balkans tell us how to dress”, or by playing the indifferent style: “We know Rama is artist”, the Albanian media were rather confused, desecrated, insane, as if they had seen Isa Boletin without a gun in the belt, the Ismail Qemin without religion on the ground.

Why?

This is the particular case, this of the Albanian prime minister's “threatrs” because of his dress, because it shows the greatest paradox in the aesthetic optics of Albanian opinion and media.

So there's an essential paradox in the media and politics language in “Rastin Rama”.

Usually, the media always take avant position.

In this case, if he was criticized by his colleagues for violating bureaucratic rules, the media would usually be loud and protestable.

Is Rama himself part of that essay? I don't think so.

Journalists, who with their sentences should be avants and supporters, thus pro-reliance to a new form of aesthetic rejection of bureaucratic clothing, represented by a political leader, do the opposite: openly protect boring bureaucratic dress concessions. This happened after Eddie Rama's two public presentations first in Brussels and then Trieste.

Or we can speculate also this way: such fierce response, that of the interior Albanian insult, of the prime minister as the promoter of political, cultural society, comes from the Albanian's deep distrust that he believes to be unworthy of connaisssance “unive”, respectively, however far from the refract. As the Euro-centeric media, which they do not find dignified, may believe, show fashion to a Balkan prime minister.

Let's get back in time.

Many remember the moment when Edi Rama gave the political speech at the Socialist Party Congress. He then lost the battle to become leader of the Socialist Party. He left the hall alone. His conduct felt as respectful as his mildness. However, he was surprised that a devoted talk left the entire Socialist Party hearty stone behind him. All that was said then is in a way happening today. But it wasn't just his wish, it needed something more. Time and meaning were needed, and the Socialist Party's desire for change was also needed. That unfortunately didn't happen. The SP declared a speech about the lone bird.

It's a long time to remember lost time.

But go back to your dress.

How is Eddie Rama viewed and his garment, and what does it represent?

Many media and many journalists have commented. But very few from the Albanian world have perceived the aesthetic rejection of the bureaucracy and hygienic distance Edi Rama has built with the kind of classical and traditional power elite.

Not only with the semantics of action but also as spirit has he begun his career of refusing to rule and rule over humans historically and by powers today.

He has been and is the alpha of a partisan rule as total a crime in co-operation with the state.

Within Albania it acts.

Out there he can.

That's all it can do.

He also made it through his dress to demonstrate that he basically refuses arrogance and the power of red tape with a tie.

What do you really represent without ties and Adidas?

Today's dominant, the only thing that makes the difference everywhere, the feeling that makes the presidents and the rules of engagement, is the feeling of anti-stability, of some fashion, thinking, but autonomous being that it itself does itself where it punishes not chronic but rock's own mentality and morals.

Against the rules of the Political Power as the demonist, not only of the demonities, but also of the nature of clothing, the coded aesthetic perceptions that vary everywhere, but from politics, it didn't matter.

Trump and Macro are among those politicians who have benefited from being smart with disappointment in political elites and their rules.

But it is not easy if you are part of the institution to play with others ' feelings and rules learned for a century. And think about doing this by finding a way to avoid failure.

The man in power, who wisely found a way to expose himself unrecognizable by the grim bureaucratic codes, without jeopardising his system, is Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama.

He did it with his unique and wise styling, showing off with cool pants and t-shirts among other politicians in closed clothes in uniform suits, risking the loss of weight. But it didn't end that way because it crashed the static mentality especially inside it otherwise there would be no desecration. That was supposed to be triumphal.

His bold style unmistakably captures media attention.

There may be bureaucratic resentment from nicotine.

But his dress is much more than mere expression of creativity.

His clothing is the blow of power and escape from the idea of being one among the equals. It is the delicate way of communicating messages in the hearths of people who are filled with dissatisfaction with global elite and game rules, which make them victims of globalisation and political institutions.

Those politicians, whom Rama rejected in his dress, combined in formal suits in Brussels and at the Western Balkans Summit in Trieste. Rama communicated and briefed politics in both cases that population emotions are growing by those who want something new, and Rama shares their thinking.

So, standing outside “outside” with his creative approach to the dress code, the Albanian prime minister is beating on the powerful political message he presents those eager for change, even if he loses out of his attitude and is not going to be part of the power-sharing package.

And this powerful message resoners not only with its Albanian electorate but also with many in the Balkan region, where good things are usually not found for neighbours.

In fact, finding not only as a dress code but as a political message.

For all of those power bearers who want to chase Rama as a triangle-determinator: they need to know that emotions are transmitted and powerful, but you can't cheat them if you just walk around in a suit and talk to a certain disk and information.

Edi Rama with T-shirts and Adidasse became global news for an essential reason.

He was himself.