Bread, Islam, Catholicism of Yugoslavia

Religion once again returned with its whole potential to the center of overwhelming noises. I'm deliberately saying religion and not just the discussion on glass, parcels, architectural styles, urban planning. That's because these are just lustrations, either way, of tailless reasoning in the unresolved knot of religion's thinking on us. Covering the real spiritual provocation and perfection, which exists in the back of this knot, which actually causes it. They may even be viewed as a certain luxury change in the absence of predigma. I don't see any of us who actually feel the comfort of technical meaning, when you're referring to something like glass paraparcea, catedralja, etc. On the contrary. The neurotic spasms and frustrations immediately begin. This inconsistent knot, of course, had its own historical transmission and grip. Raviism that, above all, I believe can be viewed as being separate from the problem that the Balkans/a part of it has had and has with religion in recent decades.

That is because there are at least 10 peoples that, up to 90, from Macedonia to Slovenia, shared the same fate in being part of the Yugoslav state. In one form or another, there were/it are generations that shared the same public and political discourses, the same schooling, if not the same volunteer or forced commitment to the event. Yugoslavia was a country called to progress. In other words, in the scientific progress promoting Marxism (in fact just a few miles above Yugoslavia in Hungary, Austria, and Germany had tremendous debates and developments to lead Marxism to new horizons, from Giorgi Luckas to Frankfurt School, but what does Yugoslavia want when it was enough with Gajo Petroviqi's Cardel) of these people combined? And when Yugoslavia fell, there happened to be not a single avant, either diaspora or a single avant, which was supposed to have been threatened by wars, ready and worthy to stand up for the foundations of that state that supposedly produced trust and identity in people.

From the turn of the soldiers who killed in Srebrenica by Serbian clerics, Mladic's statement about Turkey, to Ibrahim Rugova and Catedralja; from Anton Kchira, Shefq Krasniqi of at Lavdrim Muhrami, has a similar family network of menses that is supra-national and sura-state: so regional, that it finds possession and realism in what today may be considered to be the experience of religion not self-religious but the idea of the faith of the religious design of religious ideology. Just make a click or look at the Balkan websites, pages on YouTube or television shows where religion is discussed, and find the family's almost surprising approach.

If the idea of the cathedral was conceived as rejection of Islam, Ottomans, past, etc., in the name of a distorted Catholic and self-orientative cathedral that does not reflect neither modern nor devotion, but inferior complexes in the fate or disaster of being protectorate, by a certain sort of naive beating for Catholic pastʹte what measured by the quotas of progresum was in fact further back then the Ottoman text is now coming as a requirement of a community allegedly confused with what happened in the last 40 years. In Muslims the reaction is seen as much political, cultural, and therefore religious unconsciousness that for decades not only did they find themselves reconciled to the structures and mechanisms of the former system (Sabria Baygora has had such poetry for Tito) but also with those of the Imaginarian Republic using Rugova, until it wasn't quite open to its cattolic delta. The same as we find today, the Tarvana were servants more devoted to power than to God. The same are civic activists who are supposedly called into evil moderns. And when we ask which troll this all looks like, the answer is to the troll where the fiasco called secularism happened. But if I call them the same? Simply: The whole of religion could not even be imagined in the 25 - year - old 1965-1990! It is the religious oppression that has broken out with all their pre - modernities that confronts a person who takes him for good in the opressive modernization of the past, in an ideally hybrid era, which is the worst of being nearly away from serious debate trends.

Both hypnotism with Catholicism and vehabism and the return of superstitious charlatans and their superstitious visitors to media news are a reactital infiltrate of the banned ésacrals in the voids of the Yugoslav banking explanation. Therefore, we find the application for the mosque always a precedent: the cathedral's, just as the mosque's opposition with the reasoning of affecting urban order, is in fact a SIPAS reaction to an urban planning that was supposed to be right, even though some 46 thousand palisan construction in the capital weather has desecrated that urban planning of nonbehane.

We today have no answer to the question of why the whole of religion after the fall of Yugoslavia. Neither do Serbs, how did their Academy get married to the Orthodox Church and Milosevic. An oxymorror of pre-communist debacles that somehow held religion past was recured with the strike leader a party that was still nominally socialist, and with the Serbian Orthodox Church! We are also unaware of the many citizenships and systems that arose and desecrated without ever considering the work of religion, secularism, secularism, and so on. In less than 30 years, we changed at least four sets of systems: the end of Yugoslavia, Milosevic's RRF, “Insituations of the Republic of Kosovo” , U n NMIC and the state of independence. Except in the imaginary management of the 90th LDK and more or less in this 10-year-old, when we're ruled by the country's most tired and marginalized gigachovs, we were in no other case not directly participants in our realisation. From the thinking of religion, the state to the architecture or urban planning. We're deficit people, but it costs something to start thinking historically.