Can Basha be taken seriously?

Today, as I listened to the diets of Lulzim Basha weaved His DP, led by him in Kavaja, at the opening of the election campaign in the DP, happened to me something that I had experienced in the long years of this profession. Suddenly, I caught myself wiping out one paragraph after another of the article I had just started.

As I heard the calls that the DP was the only force that had survived, which had shown determination and morality, I had automatically written: then how did 200 thousand voters sign?

As I became deaf with the voice claiming that Rama ravaged with elective purchases, I had tried to argue: If you left the tent and agreed with Rama, you guaranteed us that nothing like that would happen?

As it resounded from TV the claim that the elections were determined by gangs and drugs, I had tried to ask: But then why didn't you accept the McAllister package, to be the directors of the police, but you bargained with Rama by taking the directors where he had money?

I had gone further. I told the frozen PD leader that he did theater when he entered the tent; That he had repeated this one man's show twice when he was out; That anyone who had supported the cause of the protest for free elections, claiming that with Rama caught gangs, oligarchs and media, they cannot be developed, so that they all told him unanimously when he left the tent that he was heading towards disaster; That they were all amazed that the prime minister who had drawn him as an enemy presented him as a partner in the campaign; That all of them didn't believe his ears when they heard him attacking the same opponents who attacked him, and he spoke of the table and small parties as he did.

I continued with others who actually learned to argue that Lulzim Basha was the sole guilty of this disaster, that he had been a common populist in the tent, and a voracious glutton after closing it and making the 18 May pact.

I went further, reminded him that he was denying his rivals in the DP all the things Rama asked for when he protested on the avenue. I mentioned that this deaf person will not hear any criticism just because it will crush the opposition even worse, even irreversibly.

But in the sysifian attempt to push up the stone of arguments that was again falling in the face of Basha's autism, suddenly I am fascinated by the question: What remains from being told by this man?

What could be said more than those that have been counted by his opponents in the party as Topalli, Pattozi, Imami Coast?

What more can be said (if the first are in conflict with interest) that those who have scourged tent supporters like my colleagues, Shkullaku, Gekmarkaj, and Lubonne?

As I listened to Basha speak from Cavaja as if she were in a real race, as I believed in her ears when they recited to me the words of resistance, morals, faith, shopping, gangs, I began to erase the paragraphs I had written.

It's pointless for this man to deal with seriously. He insults your intelligence if you face arguments. He offends logic if you seek time and principles.

He acts like an actor who doesn't fry for what he did, who doesn't wander for what he said, who pretends he's not the one who remembers the recent past.

Because Basha already has a model. A model that prevailed. He now knows that a political race can be won and only with the slogan: “Timon I want for myself”. That's why he's doing with the PD, what Rama did with Albania. So he claims “I freeze, but I'm not leaving”. So he gives ridiculous arguments when he talks about the wrongs of the past and looks childish when you imagine future victories. He will not speak of buffalo, of promises thrown into the wind, nor of the unit of the tent. He's now acting like another so it's not that easy to take seriously.