Reality in Kosovo lives every day, no need for admission

In recent months much has been spoken of by Aleksandar Vučić for Serbia's <x0->dialog internal Kosovo and Metohija”. It seems to be a good idea, sound. Internal dialogue as an instrument for determining real goals and objectives regarding Kosovo as one of Serbia's biggest problems. And indeed, you looked at it this way, there's nothing left to me but to say good, president! Or, looking to the Kosovo Albanians, Serbia's “dialog internal to the Republic of Kosovo”, the ideal opportunity for someone finally to say enough with Kosovo, Kosovo is hindering us because of Kosovo we are not in the European Union. But is it real to look at it this way?

Reading text “The need for clarity and effortcolleague Jethlir Bouja's”, I felt the need to highlight a slightly different perspective of this call, precisely because of the clarity and effort that (speech) Serbs from Kosovo make.

The colleague wrote: “It is imperative that Kosovo Serbs speak. They tell you what they want. You tell Serbia's Serbs whether they can accept this political reality in which they are living. It cannot be expected only of orientation leaders. I shouldn't have to wait for Wuji to tell you what to think. On the contrary, the orientation needs to get out of here. From ordinary citizens and their opinion. It is imperative that each person's concrete perspective not be challenged by legalization. Get involved. Yes, there are a million problems, and yet there is an opportunity to solve them. The bad news is whether Kosovo Serbs really allow those who have never been to Kosovo to mix and deal with their jobs. Sometimes what is served as a help is nothing more than an element of domination.” I'd totally agree with that... ten years ago! Even though my colleague says he doesn't see hypocrisy in this step of Aleksandar Vučić, I absolutely wouldn't agree with that. I really think it's extremely hypocritical to invite into the dialogue the people you've taken from most of the rights they've had against their will and almost have been forced to integrate into the Kosovo system. With agreements in Brussels and outside Brussels, we received the right to Serbia's visa-free passport, even though we are citizens of Serbia as much as Aleksandar Vučić himself is. We were entitled to keep our mobile operator and we were forced to move to the newly formed firm, even though we never signed a contract with that firm. Serbian judicial bodies were removed and thus obtained one of the basic rights, one for legal protection. These are just some of the things that have been done absolutely against the clearly expressed will of Serbs living in Kosovo. And now when all of this was done without our consent, or did they say more precisely against our will, someone is inviting us for dialogue on Kosovo? So what's left to talk about? For him to stand behind him when he even finally recognises Kosovo's independence so that he is not completely alone on that stake of shame? It's a little late for that and extremely hypocritical.

Also, the colleague writes: “Imagine if Kosovo Serbs were openly for an admission of reality, and therefore, for a return to their real problems. Wouldn't that help the articulation of President Vuquih a lot more? Definitely. This would lead Serbia itself towards the EU, and would give voice to the people here to solve the problems here.” I repeat once again that the voice of people from Kosovo is not heard from Kosovo's declaration of independence and that all have been done against them, not with them. Likewise, no one should imagine Kosovo Serbs accepting reality. Kosovo Serbs are forced and are living that reality. Unlike those who are calling for dialogue on something already done. To better understand what I mean, I'll give you a plastic example: Imagine if Albanians had been willing to accept the reality of life in Kosovo and Metohija as the Serbian province and under the regime of Milochev? Imagine that they had accepted it, and they had turned to job research, better education, protection of the environment, but to certain frames. Would they have been satisfied? Would it come to independence?

I hope you understand what I mean. And our reality is this, and we are living and living it, we have no choice. “Internal dialogue” is not a choice.

Read more in http://www.new-perspectva.com/sq/imagnoni/