Popular Plutocracy and America's Future

NEW YORK Donald Trump won as president through the support of the working class and conservative white voters with a populist platform of economic nationalism. Trump failed to consider the traditional agendas of pro-business Republicans, and pro-commerce, and just like Bernie Saunders on the left, called on Americans who had suffered from pro-business policies promoting market freedom and migration.

But, while Trump competed as a populist, he has governed as a pluralcrat, finally embracing the discredited theory ésupply-side of taxation, which most republics still support. The Trump also competed as someone who would place a subx0... that would call the swamp” in Washington, DC, and Wall Street. And yet he has supported his administration to billionaires [not only millionaires], while allowing the business swamp of lobbyists to grow more than ever.

The Plan of Trump and Republicans to abolish Obamacare of 2010 would leave 24 million Americans, mostly part of the poor or middle class, many of whom voted to be without health care. His corrupting policies are openly against workers and union. And the tax reform plans he approved will greatly favour multinational corporations and top 1% of rich people, many of whom would benefit particularly from abolishing property tax.

Trump has also abandoned its base in the trade zone, where he has offered rhetoric but no concrete action. Yes, he removed the TPP. [Trans] - Pacific Parnership, but the same would do Hillary Clinton. He has also abandoned the NAFTA [North American Free Trade Act], but this may only be a negotiating tactic. He has threatened to impose a 50% goods fee for China, Mexico and other business partners of the United States, but these things have not materialised. And proposals for a fixed border tax are simply forgotten.

Trump's exciting tweets against American firms that move production to kung fu or that run away from taxes are nothing but words that mean nowhere, and business leaders know that. Manufacturers who deceived Trump into making U.S. production have continued to transfer operations quietly to Mexico, China, or even other countries. Furthermore, international projections in pending tax legislation will give multinational companies even more opportunities to invest, produce abroad, while using transfer prices and other schemes to keep profits from low tax jurisdictions.

Also, despite the aggressive rhetoric of Trump on the issue of immigration, its policies have been relatively moderate, perhaps because the majority of business people who supported his campaign are actually in favour of a smoother attitude. The Muslim halting “does not affect the US workforce. Although reports have accelerated at this time, it is worth remembering that millions of undocumented immigrants have also been deported during the time of Barack Obama. The border wall that Trump said would force Mexico to pay remains a mere dream. And even the administration plans to favour qualified workers are not meant to reduce the number of legal immigrants in the country.

The Trump has ruled as a pluralo with populist clothes which are different, like a pluto-populist. But why has he left his basis to advance those policies that would hurt them? According to one view, he is expecting social conservatives and white colley-cart supporters in poor areas to vote on the basis of a nationalist and religious Senate and the cause of antipathy for secular elites, more than their financial interests.

But how long can people support their “God and weapons” at the expense of “Plutopulists who led the Roman Empire knew that keeping the populist crowd required substance as the diversion: Panem et circenses “buk and circus.” Tweets expressing rage are meaningless to people who can hardly afford a dignified life, and who can't go to modern Coliseum to watch football.

Tax legislation the Republicans are trying to push to Congress can prove very dangerous, since millions of middle class and low-income people will receive very little of that, but which will actually pay more when income tax cuts are gradually lifted. Furthermore, the republican plan would remove Obamacare. According to the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] this would make 13 million people lose health insurance, and insurance promises would increase by 10%, for the next decade. Not surprisingly, one survey showed that only 29% of Americans support the Republican plan.

However, Trump and the Republicans seem willing to take risks. After all, by delaying the increase in middle class taxes, they have predicted that their plan be saved from election losses.

For more, final legislation is possible to lower the federal discount for mortgage interest and eliminate deregulation for the state and local taxes. This will hit families in countries that support Democrats, such as New York, New Jersey and California, more than areas that support the Republicans.

Another part of the republican strategy [recognised as “or and the beast”] will be to lower the high deficit from tax cuts to argue for cuts in so-called rights expenditures, such as Medcare, Medicaid, food stalls and social insurance. Again, this is a big risk because the middle class and the poor class rely heavily on these programs. Yes, working poor people who don't get social payments or food stamps include minorities that tend to vote on Democrats. But millions of pastries, white conservatives who voted Trump also rely on these, and other similar programmes.

With the growing global economy, Trump probably hopes tax cuts and disorder will give enough growth to create enough work for which he could boast. A potential growth of 2% would not do much work for the kokelkal base, but at least push the stock market to the highest point ever. And, of course, Trump will claim that the American economy will grow by 4%, although all the leading economists, including the Republicans, agree that the potential of growth will remain 2%, despite its policies.

Whatever happens, Trump will continue to do tweets as a maniac, promoting false news, and boasting about the greatest and best “economy” sometimes. By doing so, he may even create a circus as Roman emperors. But if this rhetoric is not enough, he can choose to attack in the international sphere. This would mean leaving the NAFTA, doing business actions that would hit China or other business partners, or taking tougher policies on immigration.

And if these measures do not satisfy its base, Trump will still have a remaining option, what Roman emperors and dictators used during difficult times. He could try to replace the dog “by manufacturing an external threat or entering external ventures with the military to draw his supporters from what he and the convention republics were doing.

For example, it could start a war with North Korea or Iran. Or it could often be the exciting tweets about Islam's misery, so by encouraging more people to join I SIS or other extremist groups. This would increase the possibility of inspired attacks by I SIS, for example, the lone werewolf “ ” who throw themselves into the air or drive vehicles towards the crowd. When that happens, Trump then means, “A I told you.” And if things go bad enough, Trump and his generals can declare emergency conditions, suspend civil liberties, and transform America into an authoritarian plural-populist state.

It's real time to worry when even the Republican conservative, chief of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, openly warns the beginning of World War III. And if you are not obedient, consider the latest story of Russia or Turkey; or the history of the Ottoman Empire during the reign of Caligula or Nero. Plutopulists have turned democracies into autism. There's no reason why this thing stops here. Emperor Trump's reign can only be the beginning.

Subtitle by: Periscope