Why Lumez is not guilty

Things explain themselves without ignoring philosophers. That is how one of the greatest thinkers of Western philosophy, Aristotle, believed. Beautiful but lacking in truthfulness, however, its author loved the truth more [as he himself said] than his teacher [Platon]. The truth is, we're in the linguistic paradigm, and we've learned that things don't exist automatically. There is no extra-lingual reality, or that precedes that linguistic reality. We create and explain things.

Although there is no scientific zeal of the Greek philosopher, in such a statement that things explain themselves, our society also believes. That is how you deny your own souls. And he doesn't care. He liquidates to see counterfeiters, criminals, and murderers and then heroes and good people. Not realizing that he is their creator, even with its lazyness and ignorance. A narrow, sad non-virtual virtuality, and thus completely open to manipulation.

Fuck.

Work is a creative value, but it does not maintain and shape it. Not at least by standing on the foundation as a job, as a willful productive act. Like strong persistence for the new and the future. What forms and maintains values, conditions, and things is the opposite - resistance to work. From its etimology, in ancient Greek and Latin, work was viewed with negativeity - fatigue and labor. That's because it was connected to a order that worked through slaves who were called the above - mentioned philosopher the verb. In the last two hundred-five years, what built the world was exactly the second piece of dialectic between work and non-employment. Ironically, public space was dictated not only by diligent workers, by keen thinkers, but also by lazy ones who did not deepen into anything but who became their own power. This was present, especially in small places, where the concept of the new and unconventional cloud was not allowed to place itself in culture: and therefore, we had cyclical visions of history, and, as Kundra explains, [when talking about nations and tools] an inability to think of ourselves in one place, so to think of ourselves in construction.

The sweetness of our society is imperiling the nation. According to the way this concept [sires persh] is formulated today, it has never had an Albanian nation, and let's not talk about the newly proclaimed nation, the Kosovar one. We haven't had functional economies, functional agriculture, the army that defends or attacks, efficient administration, and justice. Without them, the nation is only symbolic - presented in virtuals and in culture, sports, and arts.

Ironically, those who love the nation mostly today [are Albanian, or Kosovo] are the ones who leave this country. Those who were sent away, who serve with the mechanisms of other nations. The nation is also needed on holiday, when it is public activity, and its daily malfunction is forgotten. The nation should, only when he is not there, visible and vulnerable despite his ugliness and coldness. This absence of nation, not only as a result of bad luck in wars, but especially as a result of a lazyness to create and of the strange notion that things happen on their own, and explain themselves.

People's sweetness for thinking, understanding and explaining things has become a fertile ground for political and social fraud. Deblet, not just in our tenor-national, has been a formative of political legalism, the consequences of which are obvious. Fascism, racism, blind bureau, organic nationalism, Communism, and so on. The sweetness of people's minds compels each political agent, whether it's a party or an individual, [to the extent of today's word], to narrow down his tongue to simplify the meaning.

And so, as a result of this resistance to work today everything works badly. First, thought. Everything is corrupt, even more important, information. We are produced by a small and logical language that fails to be translated in meaning. And of course, this is related to power and politics. Because there's no truth out there. Language boundaries are also at one time the limits of politics.

Fuck.

State chief prosecutor Aleksandar Lumez is being charged with counterfeiting the jurisdictional exam. Same one, a year ago his private phone was stolen at his house. While the identity of the accusers is incompatible and tarnished in domestic politics. First, it was Enver Hasani... convicted of thieves. The second is that of non-professional television, which does not tire of whether it conveys racist messages and ironically, on the day Hasan was found guilty, he invited him to one of his most widely followed shows. The identity of the third is that of Gazeta Express portal linked to power.

As for Lumez. Despite the accuser profile, he's actually guilty. Technically guilty. His evidence is forged. And he has become the chief prosecutor by violating the criteria associated with that exam. But it's more complicated than it was shown by these people. Lumez had become the prosecutor, acknowledging that he had not passed the jurisdictional exam by Riza Smaka and the chief administrator of Unfriend Bernard Kouchner. And here, this job should be done, and Lumez would be left alone. At least according to me. Kosovo does not have an institutional tradition, and therefore it is necessary to accept shortcomings inherited from the past system. Kosovo is a place of improvisement because sometimes it is the only form to do the job. And it's obvious that Lumez is disturbing someone's power-related interest group. This becomes known, not just by random research, but also by its daily media. From stealing the phone. And from fighting corruption [the largest in Kosovo] that took place just during its time. He may also be caught, I don't know, but he broke up some corrupt net. Also, it is clear that he was part of the blackmail that Enver Hasani had blackmailed him [considered that the case against him was pronounced immediately after he was convicted of thieves]. And it's clear that the chief prosecutor had not accepted blackmail, and thus took over the stain he was attached to.

Lumez himself had experienced an injustice in the case of Risa Smaka. The commission to pass a jurisdictional exam had never been assembled during the 1990s. Understandably, in the light of these said [even by those who accuse] and without prejudice, Lumez does not appear more ignorant or unqualified. He's a counterfeiter, yeah, but only if we're making sense of each member in our institutions as an editorial. The very foundations of our institutions are counterfeit and distorted. Rector Ramadan Zejnullahu acknowledged that his mission UP's since its establishment was patriotic, and this had caused massive criteria to be written. To create Albanian quadro, turning a blind eye to processes. The violations of the statute as he continued had become standard work. So, what else can we talk about here? Ah, for accusers. To them, it can be said of many things.

Today, more than ever, Nietzsche's grave word reads: “There is no evidence, there is only interpretation! ”