Why shouldn't I meet Palestine?

It says: Ben Bludshi of Palestine, France and Britain, has raised a fundamental question about the morals of peoples. The question is, when does a people deserve to have their own country? The world still has many peoples who have no state, although they have fought more than Palestinians, although they have endured longer than they have, [...]
It says: Ben Blushi
The recognition of Palestine by France and Britain has raised a fundamental question on the morals of peoples.
The question is, when does a people deserve to have their own country?
The world still has many peoples that have no state, although they have fought more than Palestinians, although they have lasted longer than they have, although they have not occupied anyone with land as Palestinian Arabs have done for centuries, and although they have not created terrorist organisations that kill children playing in the courtyard.
In the last 80 years Palestinians have done everything wrong.
They were their country's greatest enemies.
In 1947 they rejected the UN formula for the creation of two states, Palestina and Israel and went to a guerrilla war they lost.
Then they went back to war in 1967 with the help of other Arab states and lost again.
In 2000, President Clinton's Peace Accords were rejected, under which Israel and America recognised the Palestinian state and if they were to gather Palestinian rejections, it turns out that Israel has rejected the state of Palestine less than Palestinians themselves.
Moving from failure to failure to Palestinians wasted time, land, finances, soldiers, allies and hope in order.
Just look at the numbers of demographic growth in these two peoples to figure out how they treated themselves.
In 1947 all Palestinian territory had 2 million inhabitants.
Of these 1.4 million were Arabs, and 600 thousand were Jews.
The numbers are down today.
Palestine has about 5 million inhabitants, and Israel has 10 million.
In 80 years, Israel, this country created by immigrants who came from Europe after they were massacred and expropriated by Hitler, created in the desert the most advanced agriculture in the planet, built the most intelligent army we have seen so far, is the undisputed leader in the AI, and has an economy that produces $600 billion dollars a year, several times larger than many European countries today who are recognising Palestine and twice as much as Iran, although its underground dry smoke does not contain any oil.
Meanwhile Gaza and West Bank, where 5 million Palestinians live, cannot do more than $15 billion a year, and this before the war.
Looking at these numbers, you don't need to be an economist, to understand what one people has done in 80 years and what the other people have done.
But it doesn't end here.
Comparing the standards of democracy of these two peoples is even more painful.
Israel is a strong democracy, there is freedom in the press, most newspapers are against the government, people go out every week in protest, parliament office, elections are held every four years and courts are looking forward to imprisoning the prime minister in office, on suspicion that his wife has received some expensive gifts.
On the other hand, Palestinians have not made choices for twenty years.
And once they voted, they chose Hamas, who, of course, no longer allows choices since the day he took power.
The question is why this change?
Why do two peoples living in one land, fed from the same land, drank the same water, and washed from a sea, differ so much.
How could Israel become an economic superpower for 80 years, while Palestinians could not produce either democracy or economy for the same period of time?
Those who want to justify Palestinians say Israel has prevented them from developing the economy and democracy.
Ironically, recent elections in Palestinian territories were held in 2005 when the Israelites left Gaza and left them to Palestinians.
Since that day, elections have been no longer made, and it is therefore strange to think that Palestinians go to the polls only when they are occupied.
When they're free they don't want elections.
This is the real Gaza crisis that no recognition can solve.
Palestinian inability to govern itself.
Their inability to recognise democracy as a joint instrument.
Do Palestinians deserve the state under these conditions?
Should there be a nation that, instead of elected institutions, agrees to be ruled by an armed terrorist group?
Is all Gaza Hamas?
Do Palestinians love Hamas?
Unfortunately it is.
In the past two years millions of Israelis have protested the war, but no Palestinian has opposed Hamas
Palestinian youths who cross the thorn wire to kill Israeli girls at the concert have never rebelled against Hamas.
Those who sacrifice their lives to massacre innocent civilians could have risked rising up against Hamas.
But that didn't happen.
Palestinians love Hamas.
Terrorists, they proclaim martyrs.
There are no parties in Gaza, no leaders and no political groups that oppose Hamas.
Hence, the unconditional recognition of Palestine is a reward that Palestinian people do not deserve.
People must take responsibility for their actions.
We Albanians brought the communists into power by vote and for 45 years we did nothing to bring them down.
Communists raped us and we subjected ourselves to violence.
If, far away, Albanian communists had violated another people, we would have been equally responsible as Germans responsible for bringing Hitler to power and giving him children soldiers to conquer the world.
Today the Germans recognize this moral lowland and live with their heads sitting that by their votes created a monster.
But this moral criterion cannot exclude Palestinians.
Hamas is their monster.
They gave birth to this sample and therefore must be equally responsible as the Germans.
In the name of morality, Palestinians have to be placed as a condition of the extinction of the sample they created.
Hamas' scathing can be not only Israel's duty, but the Palestinians themselves.
They belong to them not to give the children soldiers, they belong not to shelter the terrorists, they belong to the ruthless murderers finally from the heart.
The Palestinians must go through a process of exorcism, they must bring the devil out of their souls.
Only if they do this civil act can they gain the right to have their own country.
Thus, it is wrong to believe that Palestine is related only to Israel.
The government of Israel has made many mistakes, its army has killed innocent citizens, women old and helpless children, so many people rightly believe that the punishment deserved for this country is to have a neighbor like Hamas bites every day.
The recognition of Palestine is punishment for Israel killing without stopping, but punishment cannot be someone else's gift.
Palestinians don't deserve the country to be forgiven because they haven't done anything to deserve it.
Western knowledge is at risk of creating a new Goliath on the border of Israel, a fierce country that threatens and fights over and over again.
But mythical Goliath was Palestinian, although he was not an Arab, and perhaps having a neighboring monster is the destination of Israel, which today is nothing like David, the poor Hebrew shepherd who saved his people by killing Goliath.
The Palestinians of all their errors even say that Goliath and David have changed their places.
Now weak David is Palestinian, and the terrible Goliath is Israeli.
The solution, however, is not found in recycling legends.
Palestine's case involves not only Israel but the morals of the day
Palestine is not ready to live together with the rest of the civilized world.
That's the point.
Palestine is not ready to live together.
Palestine is not ready to live like us.









