14 hours agoBlues “script Why shouldn't Palestine be known” is an immoral writing
Periskopi(9 months ago)
(9 months ago)It says: Ermal Mulosmani Blue script “Why shouldn't Palestina” be known was a writing beginning with a big moral question, but it was actually the end of the immoral top. The one-sided delivery of facts and the easy and incorrect finding of conclusions is the very essence of sophist propagandists. The question “A deserves [...]
It says: Ermal Mulosman
Blues script “Why shouldn't Palestine” be known was a scripture beginning with a big moral question, but it was actually the unmatched end. The one-sided delivery of facts and the easy and incorrect finding of conclusions is the very essence of sophist propagandists.
The question “A deserves the state of Palestine” - it's a question without any sense. At least in a moral sense.
The advantages Blushi mentions for the Jews - since demographic evolution (which is involved in a large amount of immigration), the remarkable capacity to build state, economy, science and culture are no result in the non-state of Palestinians!
The premiere of “state-building” as the conclusion to accession is diabolical. This question could be raised by a Darwinian or Hitler dimension but by no means a moral dimension. Morale's right.
The constitution of the rights of the weak, if you want the disabled. The guarantee that their rights will not be violated by the Force of Strong or “skilled”. The right of a people to have their own country is not a merit issue, and it is never laid down.
Palestine has its own country known by 153 countries in the world. Even a weak and incompetent country. Because the world built some government rules that know people's right to self-decision.
Most of the arguments brought by Blues are strength and skill. There is no doubt that the Israelites have testified to their overall superiority over the Arabs with whom they share the same land.
It's too much to discuss. Leave it from a military or a force standpoint. The result of Arab efforts has increasingly ended in disaster, increasingly in loss of territories, increasingly in subjection.
And there is no sign in this for destruction. That land would be more prosperous if it was inhabited only by Jews, there is no question. The more Israel expands, not only in Gaza and the West Coast but also in Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, and Egypt, the more developed the area will become.
The promise of prosperity and development is a promise that comes from all other moral reasons. Developed nations, with such motives, will always attack weak-informive populations.
They would do it in the name of development, prosperity, prosperity. And local populations would be assimilated into the name of progress.
Hitler, through euthanasia, killed 250 thousand Germans with limited mental or physical abilities because they failed to meet the expectations of a superior race so they had to be annihilated. This is exactly what Blushi reminded me:
Baby people with limited mental or physical abilities do not deserve to live.
It's all but a moral sermon.
The time we are actually living is not a time of moral preachers. Right, crime, dignity, sovereignty, morality are more and more nonsense of a long time. We're going back to Tukidiki's famous saying:
Right, as the world goes, it's only between the ruling partners. As the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what is needed. ”
So immorality and Force have returned. The strong will destroy the weak. An old law as old as the world itself, a social Darwinism is in effect. Not just in Israel.
The strong will survive, the weak will die. But before they die they will do whatever they can. Terrorism too. Do not look for reasons in terrorism because where survival begins ends. Let him mention terms as democracy, choices and I told you.
Amos Oz has said somewhere about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: “don't expect two men who claim the same woman (earth) to be able to agree in coffee. ”
I can't say that the writing was without truth. Verbal and solidly based on the reason for strength. That always triumphs in the power of reason.
But the mention of the word <x0moral” in that scripture is pure speculation.
