Why should we endure the insult of Tanya Fajon?

When I hear Slovenian politician Tanja Fajon coming to Tirana and says Albania can be in the EU by 2030, I think that even this date is impossible precisely because Europe is full of politicians without any weight like Tanja Fajon, who speak without knowing what they say.

Not just to catch a gafil, that this is a very easy thing in this case, if I could ask him why do you think Albania could be part of the EU in 2030, not 2028? Or why not in 2035?

What does Tanya Fajon expect us to do until 2030 that we cannot do in 2028 or 2027?

Tanya Fajon, of course, has no answer and there is no way.

Just like her, there are hundreds of heavy-weight politicians in the EU today who make careers by participating in seminars where no decision is made and no one is accountable for what it says.

Someone who knows these kinds of politicians told me one day that to them, no action is action. Tanja Fajon is typical of a generation of politicians whose lack of action is action.

But that's not the problem, and I don't want to deal with it. No one can choose the time you live.

The problem, then, is not Tanya, but Europe that remains in Tanya's hands.

The Europe we know after the 1990s is divided in three times.

In the first time, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, Europe made fair decisions, even many rights, one of which was the membership of Slovenia, the country of Tanja Fajon, in the Evripian Union on 1 May 2004. 20 years ago.

By the second time, which was dominated by Angela Merkel, Europe made decisions, despite the fact that many of them were wrong as the Greek crisis was, to strengthen Germany and weaken all others, which brought out Great Britain, which rightly could not bear the German domination of Europe.

In the third time, though, in our time, the problem is even greater. Europe no longer makes any decisions. If politicians in charge today were in effect in 2004, surely Tanja Fajon himself would not have voted for Slovenia, her country to become a member of the European Union.

This does not mean that tanks and tanks do not want Slovenia or Albania. This means that no decision is the most prominent feature of Europeans today.

Europeans today make no decision, not for Ukraine, nor for immigration, nor for Israel, nor for Hamas, nor for enlargement, and how we might ask that we make a decision for Albania.

As soon as one issue is over, another one opens up, and when the second issue starts to be resolved, elections come and if you haven't solved the first issue correctly, then second you lose your election, so the biggest feature of political survival in Europe is the opening of all cases and the failure of either.

That's why immigrants flock but are not integrated into Europe, so there is no end to the war in Ukraine, so the economy is always on the decline, so Kosovo and Serbia can't find peace, so there's no expansion, and there probably won't be much longer.

If Europe once had strategies, some of which failed and therefore turned into tactics, it now has none but techniques.

These may be called electoral techniques, which means that by doing nothing, you make it easier.

Rather, the ability to create crises is voted out more than the ability to solve them. So each crisis is followed by another then another and living in crisis has become normal.

Because she lived at the time when major strategies were forgotten and the power was taken over by small tactics, Angela Merkel lost her political heritage, Boris Johnson lost the party, while Macro is closing both mandates without leading any work to the end.

Immanuel Macron is the king of this technique without the essence of what is otherwise understood: pretend to do too much and do nothing. The continued Macroni piracy between left and right in Europe is now called constructive liberalisation.

This is the last fashion in Europe that looks like a heels walk before the crash.

Unfortunately we live at this time and therefore Tanja Fajon leaves Tirana proud of believing that he not only did a job but also because he believes we believe he has given us little faith.

Now that I remember that Slovenia became an EU member 20 years ago in 2004, I believe some comparisons are worth it.

Anyone who knows this magnificent mountain country from which large NBA basketball players, first American ladies or Marxist philosophers like Slavoj Zizek occasionally come out, cannot convince me that Slovenia's margin with Albania is almost 30 years old.

Slovenia is no doubt a better-run country than Albania in the last 100 years and no doubt in the last 30 years, but its great fate was that it did not get involved in the internal conflicts of Yugoslavia. Contrary to what happened in Croatia, the war between Serbia and Slovenia lasted only 10 days in 1991 and almost cannot be called a war because no more than 20 soldiers were killed.

So if we come back in 2004, the EU's very fair decision on membership in Slovenia was driven not only by the quality of economy and democracy, of the rule of law, but by its release to peace from Yugoslavia's hell. Croatia, the twin country with Slovenia, burned in this hell and barely got out of there to join the EU nearly ten years later in 2013.

In Europe, there is probably no country that resembles Albania more than Slovenia.

They have 2.1 million people we have 2.4 million. They're a little way out of the Adriatic we have the biggest exit after Italy. They have many forests and mountains as we do. They got as much snow as we do, but we got a lot less skiers. They have no borders with Serbia, nor do we. They're in NATO, so are we. They were 6 million tourists, we believe we had 7 million. Of course they have a gross domestic product nearly 4 times larger than we do, but keeping in mind that they are EU members for 20 years, that difference is not as big as it seems.

Then what more must we do to be part of the EU as Slovenia? What have we not done since 2004 when Slovenia became an EU member and that is why Tanja Fajon thinks he has the right to set the day when we enter?

I think there is no country that has done more in 30 years than it has been asked of Europe. Albania is the most obedient country on this continent and perhaps even on the planet. Albania unfortunately has colonial subjection that sometimes amounts to humiliation.

We have been asked not to claim a square meter lost in the Balkans, we have. We have been asked to discourage Kosovo joining Albania every day without restraint. We've been invaded without being returned. We've been asked to be hostile to Russia. We've been asked to reject Chinese investments we've done with stubbornness, even though they haven't and don't have to. We've been asked to take soldiers to Afghanistan where we have no reason to be, we've done it. We've been asked to close the market for birth. We've been asked to cut the prices of our agricultural products. They took most of our natural resources or destroyed us, displaced, accepted. We've been restricted by fishing quotas in the Adriatic. We've been asked to build a special court they run, we've done it. We've been asked to appoint those judges and prosecutors we've accepted. They monitor our elections and tell us how we should make and accept. We've been asked to give them workers every day. We've been asked by miners, farmers, nurses, waiters, students who pay as French chickens, and we've done and done. We've been asked to change laws and fail to adopt laws that might favor our market.

So what do we still have to do to be treated like Slovenians?

Why do we still need to be more obedient when we are so obedient? What should we still do to treat us as slaves like Bulgarians and like Romanians?

I don't know. But the point is, Tanya doesn't even know.

Now she's gone and I can't ask her, and I don't really want to ask her because her foolishness offends me and makes me write things that I didn't even think 30 years ago.