Why is it not enough for us to turn left to Europe?

Why is it not enough for us to turn left to Europe?

It says: Ben Blushi as a man who has always voted for the left, I am not thrilled with the return of the left to Britain and France. Like many others, I know this is just like covering the house with bags before the flood starts. Sooner or later the flood [...]

 

As a man who has always voted for the left, I am not thrilled with the return of his left to Britain and France.

Like many others, I know this is just like covering the house with bags before the flood starts.

Sooner or later the flood will happen and the bag will pour water all over the place. Then the owners of the house will pack up and no one will know where the fastest exit is from, left or right.

Anyone who reads these lines, describing the coming of a delug, or an escape, would ask me why I predict so badly, after all the worst was avoided, the left came to power in France, because it was used as a bag from a moderate right to prevent the flooding of the extreme right.

That is the problem.

In the history of modern and left Europe, there has never been such a insignificant substitute role. It is being used to temporarily settle the scores between the centre-right and the far-right, whose coming to power is just a matter of time and that has a reason or many reasons.

The last decade of right liberals has been a disaster that brought Europe out of the global market and turned it into a small superpower.

Europe has lost its economic power in behalf of China, lost its military power in behalf of America, lost demographic power in behalf of Africa every day is losing the power of creativity in behalf of Asia and many other peoples.

Europe looks like a big restaurant where you sit to rest after visiting a museum and before going to another museum. The restaurant owners are French, Belgian, German, Italian, Austrian, Czech, while all the workers are African, Asian, Turkish, Latin, and to resolve conflicts between local owners and incoming workers, European parties campaign and occasionally change seats in parliament.

That was the case yesterday in France. Because of an effective electoral tactic, one right made a pact with the left to prevent the other right. France will find a coalition to govern after the elections, but there will be no solution.

So social conflicts will not only continue but also increase.

Unfortunately, never again do the policies of Merkel and Macron, as well as all who have been following them with a close eye for so long, seem incomplete. Without any idea and with much prejudice, liberal rightmen began to destroy the left by actually creating the extreme right.

Merkelmacrons increased inequality in Europe, weakened the middle class, gave the banks all power as a way to control small states, turned universities into shops, stripped of their minds, turned NATO into a division of US Army legions, prevented Europe's expansion, did nothing to integrate immigrants, and sparked an unnecessary conflict in Ukraine, which they could have avoided by diplomacy.

This failure had a consequence: the right extreme in Germany, France, Italy no longer has to stop because it seems to have answers to some issues the Merkelmacrons have always left unanswered.

Now they have the last move left - to use the left to protect themselves as happened yesterday in France.

To understand how weak and hopeless the victory of the left in Europe is just to see what is being said in Europe today. At a time when the world speaks of artificial intelligence, Europe speaks of Ukraine. Other superpowers compete to produce digital minds, while Europe's leaders are listed in an ideaological coalition against Russia, which is not solving the crisis militarily or by diplomacy. He just expects one of the parties to turn himself in.

The power of today's Europe can only be understood by one comparison: America's richest man today produces robots, that is, smart machines, while the richest man in Europe produces clothes, money, and bags.

It wasn't like that 100 years ago. Not 50 years ago. Europe's bags, perfumes and restaurants were cemented in the last two three decades as a luxury product of Merkel, Macroni and those who did not understand that the world can do without Europe, but Europe can no longer do without the world.

Thus, Europe, which was small, became even smaller and was probably never smaller and never weaker.

Merkelmacrons have done Europe the biggest damage since Hitler's time, and unfortunately their similar predecessors in the 1930s who were also liberal without priors were those who made it up to Hitler, Europe as a shield to Russia.

Something looks strange today. Russia is again an argument, an excuse, a reason and a pretext to do nothing and to weaken.

Europe's power to decide for the world has weakened and the power to decide for itself is running out. Europe has no power to change or destroy the world that can be good.

In these conditions we are still outside of Europe, because of the ugly and racist decisions of the right European liberals, we have to not rejoice much whenever the left comes to power to prevent those who do not in any case: extreme right.

Europe has wanted us to be Europeans of a different kind and perhaps we should strengthen this profile. We've once tried to be an Idealological Republic now it's time to go back to a Trade Republic that makes decisions on its own interests, open to both the West and the East, and very hospitable to foreigners.

A Trade Republic is what respects the law, guarantees the property, makes free elections, accepts migrants as a labour force and deals more with business than politics. For a World Trade Republic, there is more than one alliance of markets.

The Trade Republics live in peace with all, and they shelter indiscriminately all who are disappointed both from the east and from the west, both from the left and from the right, from the immigrants, refugees, pilgrims, nomads, tourists, pensioners, or fiscal sinners of any kind.

If in Europe, every stranger is a problem, in a trade Republic every stranger is a fortune. Banks of the Trade Republic are open to everyone, while the banks of Europe are the first police departments. If in Europe every stranger is a suspect, in a trade Republic every foreigner who buys, sells and works is welcome. So while other countries think about taxes and security, the Trade Republic considers prices and harmony. That's the difference.

In a closed Europe, Albania may be the most open country. As is often the case in the family history: you win by not doing as you love.

Related
When Political Myth Becomes Stronger Than Economic Reality

When Political Myth Becomes Stronger Than Economic Reality

Letter to the Little Girl from Vushtrria

Letter to the Little Girl from Vushtrria

The moral revolution was enjoyed with white gloves

The moral revolution was enjoyed with white gloves

Albin Kurti's people gave everything, why is he so unhappy and hateful?

Albin Kurti's people gave everything, why is he so unhappy and hateful?

LITU T. ATIT

LITU T. ATIT

Inflation 2.0 or the Kurtian theory of electoral tip

Inflation 2.0 or the Kurtian theory of electoral tip

A manipulator's governing manual, such as Albin Kurti

A manipulator's governing manual, such as Albin Kurti

Next success of Kurti Government: Champions in inflation, last in perspective

Next success of Kurti Government: Champions in inflation, last in perspective

From Albin Kurt to Sami Lushtaku: The History of a Language That Produced Violence

From Albin Kurt to Sami Lushtaku: The History of a Language That Produced Violence

How Russia Lost Friends and Global Influence

How Russia Lost Friends and Global Influence

Kurti's <x0...

Kurti's &lt;x0...

Albin Guevara and Mickoski: Defictorisation of Albanians in Northern Macedonia

Albin Guevara and Mickoski: Defictorisation of Albanians in Northern Macedonia

Kurt from electrosi engineer to political chaos engineer

Kurt from electrosi engineer to political chaos engineer