Opposition, Power, and Citizens

It says: Ismail Tasholli

We've come to a situation where political definitions build relationships, and a very happy family. Sabah blooms up bitter or cheerful, depending on what happens to politicians to tell us on the map, forgetting the main fact that the powers are mortal, KALIMTEAR If we have life, we will wait and follow many more.

We gave the glasses that only those paints we love, and we took part in polarising society under the terms of power, because they would be able to have narrator greenhouses that never mattered stories, and opponents “serux1> to correct the tricks.
If we trust the reflective phrases, the slogan “becomes what you read” sums up collective schizophrecy (mainly the blame for the current power), because the PUBLIK is built with many lies, insults, and noises, only to maintain power and invoke boundaries between facts and illusions.

We made politics the only measure of every situation and everyone. Dofar junkie's toy politics that even quantum theories link to leaders' speeches.

A conflicted rhetoric was created that divided society into “ne” against “reme,” strengthening U n STEPS while losing emphasis on dialogue and solving real problems for society.

In the question of how the OPOSIA must behave in the face of this madness and polarization, there are many rules that must be followed so as not to speak foolishly. It is a methodological plurality of answers.

It seems to me that a year ago in a television debate I participated in was said by an opposition that 51% of the citizens are in awe. I interrupted the speaker by saying: If you think like the opposition, you make two big mistakes: one morality and one strategic.

You must be mistaken because you insult a large part of the citizens by suggesting that they have no political intelligence and that they're stupid. Those with that intelligence have it as the legacy of survival efforts. And this situation has developed some rational sensations as seen in the recent municipal elections, where citizens told the great leader that his name is insufficient as competition for the progress in the municipalities they live in.

You're also ignoring the message he gave you: that he doesn't want to reconcile with some of your phenomena that you've been building since after the war, period. Let's not pretend we're not from KTUSK.

The strategic mistake is this: you have to convince even these 51% to ask critical questions, eventually some to vote for you and change that power, because voters from Mars planet can't. You'll talk to these guys, they'll convince you, but not to offer them up because they'll change the channel. Plus, you can't beat your opponent in chess using his style he just beat you, he knows that style.

Will the opposition succeed in replacing the country with power? I don't know. But the important thing is that we avoid polarization, because it's like a black hole that's taking all of our energy and our human potential, nothing but the desire of power to get us inside their habitat, where power professors “make sense. ”