Opposition government, be careful: The association is “Zbarkon” slowly but secure

Should Kosovo sacrifice its near future “, but, sure, at “, over a bright future”, but, uncertain!

Dilema “hamletian” Before which the entire political estabilisation is currently located, but also the Kosovo civilian, has to do with what decision-making should make them as the main political acts, right now (Of course.) historical? And not just for Kosovo, but for the entire future of Albanians in the Western Balkans. Because through this decision-making (on the association, which is apparently creating such a political and judicial situation, where de facto and de jure, the foundation of a “Republika Srpska, in Kosovo!) difficult, the entire political, civilian, media and intellectual spectrum, IT IS a matter of bearing witness as far as he can see so that he does not later repent but takes pride in right decision making and in favor of protecting state interests (Republic) and national (Uiman Lake's billions of land resources and resources) and the underground (Trepca's likewise billionth assets). This dilemma “hamletian”, Before it is resolved; to analyze, evaluate, interpreted from all scientific and academic professional perspectives and profiles. So it must have a team of experts (I hope the government, at least, formed it wide now!) that has neither ideological, political nor clanal burdens, but only professionalism and merityocracy; law, political, diplomatic, historical, economic, sociological and anthropological. This team of experts, besides, I have to answer (Logical, political, economic, diplomatic) even questions and dilemmas “hamletan“, as is this about the issue of association. The answer should explain both the causes and the consequences (Do not) Plan Accession Franco-German. So, to simplify: Does this mean that Kosovo, de facto and de jure must To sacrifice “to its near future”, but, secure (where the responsibility for (without the) eventual responsibility of decision-making is ours! <x) (Where responsibility, for (without) the eventual responsibility of decision making, take our international friends and allies ?!! Realistically, if we had been released by our own force in 1999, we would undoubtedly have sacrificed him “The near future”, so “back time”for one Bright future “” But since it isn't, then today we have to be very careful and very careful with our allies, so that our state interests are not just economy (for the lowest possible price) and be sure to operate and serve our national interests, but also sync them with new geopolitical interests (detecting Russian invasion in Ukraine) of ““Proscription bed” American. Theme Prescription “=x1> American, because in this <x0pazar” with Serbia, logic and theory “Interests” Kisingerian, who teaches us that; “America has no friends or enemies forever, but there are only permanent interests”, Unless it is a difficult challenge, there is also a courage with great and unknown risks, such as the government (Kurti) as well as opposition (Krasniqi, Abdixhiku, Haradinaj) say yes to any variation of association, be it by or by without competence! We say courage, even because there's no security or no guarantee of even the United States itself (Because of its interest in adapting to new geopolitical interests, in the region) that also protects its geostrategic interests in the region, and the continuation of being the only superpower in the world. American demand to find a solution, in the stalemate created between Kosovo and Serbia, we need to understand (but, not even accept ad hoc without addressing this “following this <x1-second-long interest), because the war in Ukraine is obviously threatening it seriously, but it's also trying to penetrate the entire architecture of American geotradition that it was. “installed” (from the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, to continue with interventions in Bosnia and (especially) Kosovo, to peak with membership of Albania, Montenegro, northern Macedonia in NATO) in the Western Balkan region. I think the American calculator for him, too. “Serbia cause hope it wants “Divorced” easily from Russia (in long-term stages; let the history of Serbia's report with the former Ottoman Empire, where Serbia at the moment of declaring independence, did not leave “orbita” Ottoman, but also fought many wars against it.W) is wrong and in disparitive of American geostrategic interests in the Balkans, even for some reason the causes of various nature; one: the betrayal Serbia will commit to America in a short time can be proven, because still over 70% of Serbs believe Russia and Vladimir Putin: Two, America, like the former Ottoman Empire, would repeat the mistake with Albanians, where xhonthurqi (Fascinated and infected with self - centered nationalism) xonturk Albanians, from a loyal and faithful secular friend and ally (as they were; until the first time of the Declaration of Independence, 1911“translated” and converted with “Speedy light”, To what? Albanians, they even held constant uprisings! So history (“Interests<x1 Chinese>) teaches us that friendship, alliances, as well as cultural and religious ties with the Ottoman Empire, why, it was hundreds of years old, collapsed all at once only because of the fragmentaryness of bilateral interests. For the Ottoman Empire, the cause of jealousy and the tendency to preserve kid status (that had already become cancerous for the entire Balkan region(Finally! ) The state and legalising their national identity, just as other Balkan nations... Now, when it comes to the German franc plan, we should say, if Serbia's trap was, it was the conviction that by accepting the planGerman franc, Kosovo will refuse and will be declared “guilty” Key to negotiation failure, then, Kosovo (step by step) should not be confronted with gross rudeness towards this plan, even because; Russian Ambassador to Belgrade Mr. Aleksandar Bocan-Kharchenko, <x0) Serbia will not rush, in decision making, because Kosovo's final “state will be determined in other geopolitical conditions after the end of the conflict with the West on Ukraine's territory. Which he claims will end with the safe Russian victory. That means, “The hot path” Kosovo's remaining, I have to cross Serbia. Meanwhile, the Kosovo government and opposition, along with some miserable civilianists and academics, will always account for all decisions made at this time...

Albanians at a crossroads, leave the nation's fate in foreign hands, or take it into their own hands?

Our political effort, especially diplomatic, to coordinate both the preservation and the background of international recognitions, and the acceptance of this citizenship that is conditioning for who is already able should not be distinguished, much less identified; nor should political (political(Diplomatic Diary), a little bit like servilism and bend it down to breaking “spinal cordPolitical” from any political subject in Kosovo. The reason is, it's very simply, because, in today's conditions and circumstances of carded geopoliticals and non-combat competition between “dinosis” Global (political, social, economic, military, and cultural) is completely impossible and unimaginable to prove yourself completely sovereign (Wesphalia! ) About Him.in this case; strategic friend and ally(Although, not 100%) over 10,800 km2. On the other hand, the methodology of content analysis is telling us that this flexible approach to those who have helped you to free the country from a genocide regime that caused five wars in the Western Balkans; that they open the door to most states for recognition of citizenship declared on February 17, 2008; and that they are still guaranteeing that this remaining citizenship (i.e. this same citizenship).After accepting association, as a “Republika Srpska, in Kosovo”), you can go further. Retract it, train it, or even improvise it” is identified as postmodern sovereignty. On the other hand, that doesn't mean that you're going to turn into a “altoparlant”, or one “Ys” Man who never has the courage to say or pronounce it “Big and manly! In particular, when your vital state and national interests are questions. So, if this is how the charm and essence of post-modern politics turns out, you can be proclaimed heroes in the morning, and at night turn traitors? Now, if we test Brussels (more) and Washington's (lessAbout association, you know they are. Market Association: not because: Serbian recognition of Kosovo And five other European countries; and because of them (the Jews).feel) The loss Serbia suffered from NATO bombings....

3. Kosovo opposition, there are two waysWto stop Association

The agreement with Serbia, expected to be signed on February 27th, 2023, according to all likelihood, will be an agreement (Interesting! ) for a “status quoThe new and temporary”, between Serbia and Kosovo, because, in its interior, it will neither contain it, A/. syntagma (Insistant) for <x0 mutual recognition, center” as KM hoped; nor B/. The return of “to immediate implementation of the Association”, as was intended and insisted, the Serbian president; and also, there will be none; nor, C/. The power of a permanent commitment,As addressed to Serbia and Kosovo, Mr. Lajcak and Borrell) agreements that are usually ratified quickly, but they are also controversial quickly... Since the opposition has not clearly articulated (but only supports it through euphemisms) its stance on Plant Franco-German, it now has the ideal opportunity to accurately clarify the verdict; to silence what it would likely mean to sign KM Albin Kurti on February 27th; or to counter the Agreement on the horizon... When we are in conflict, I advise the opposition to use or combine two methods (Already before them he trained the VV to come to power) or two ways pretty effective. First exit is the parliament's aula where the PDK with the LDK and the AAK must test the standard and the rated decision CONDITIONAL 2011/2015 Agreement. Outway second, in my opinion, stands for the minimal rejection of all preliminary agreements, not disfellowshiping them. Agreement on the horizon of February 27, 2023Where in the following weeks the opposition I HAVE to invite all citizens of Kosovo (Indiscriminately, age, ethnicity, and ideological and religious affiliations) mass protests, against plan Franco-German (This also accounts for “porti” Association). The opposition, with this act and its civilising demonstration, to Albin Kurti's government, but also to the signing of this plan would achieve “With a rock, I'll kill two birds!“Guri” that is addressed in conflict, Association (Which galuc was working on the Franco-German Plan!) through the attempt that Just try.And be abolished! Stone”, has to do with restoring the power opposition through revolt or inadequacy of the rebellious city. So the opposition has to calculate either “algorize” of the road, or that of the parliament's aule. When it comes to parliament's aule, the LDK, with experience exercised with “Code”Rogovian philosopher“It's so much easier to accommodate the circumstances of the civilian demonstration. PdkIf he wants to wear it “ New (Because, that identifying of my opinion is “-disabled” and “counted” extremely! ) The identification that is trying to launch its new leadership, should test the method. <x0) (Conflict, Contradiction, and Rejection) parliamentary road (gas pitch in Parliament) and that of Unlined street protests. Aak, however,- as a campaign party enough to test it. “xhematin” Her appeal is that through public admission, to “against” formally, he saw any emphasis on the French-German plan. Just as I deal with the fcix0 demarcation like “friend” to west...

The agreement with Serbia, expected to be signed on February 27th, 2023, according to all likelihood, will be an agreement (Interesting! ) for a “status quoThe new and temporary”, between Serbia and Kosovo, because, in its interior, it will not contain, either; syntagma (Insistant) for “Bilateral recognition, centre” as the KM hoped; nor, the shift of the immediate “to implement the Association”, as was intended and insisted, the Serbian president; and also, will not have; in fact, the power of the permanent commitment, ofAs addressed to Serbia and Kosovo, Mr. Lajcak and Borrell) agreements that are usually ratified quickly, but they are also controversial quickly...