Kurt and Buddha

I never survive. I live. Mighty” Kurt's in public procurement. By letting him know that he will not compromise the logic of instant expense and improvisement.

It was time for the euphoria of victory, and political power was enthralling him. A kind of political autoerotism.

Later, not too late, he began to feel the limits of institutionalizing ideas for managing citizens' everydayity.
He started accusing citizens of powerful living in the form of counseling how they should behave to survive: kebabs, yoysticks, returns of flour to the furnace and the safety survival fund.

The availability of ambitions with possibilities, as an opposition to building the electoral account, has now become a political reality that is forcing Mr. Kurt's making another radical shift.

He's telling the citizens: give up the wishes and ambitions I give you and you will see my good governance.
A kind of ascetic preaching of the Stoic school, which in order to achieve happiness, requires eliminating desires.

That is how Buddha preached the way to happiness. The material world was a barrier to finding itself, happiness was a state of spirituality.
Mr. Kurti, now trying to create other techniques for training minds to accept the reality of his good governance: “a person who does not covet cannot suffer”, is telling citizens.

So he concluded that suffering was not caused by bad luck, social injustice, or divine whims. Rather, suffering was caused by patterns of behavior of our own mind, described Harary Kurti. Excuse me, Buddha.
Whether there will be jams for this new sermon and religion remains to be seen.