How deep can blind bullets wound democracy like those of the Princeton reserve?

Two nights ago, a man with many titles: First sir, the reserve in the Kosovo Army and most importantly the Republika (as well as the personality of the year from Periscope) poured out the reserve magator on Kosovo media, calling it a common criminal enterprise.

This, in short and not to repeat why, happened in terms of a media report on the spending of President Osmani's way at the time of parliament, which the media suspected and reported on public documents of the Parliament, that it deceived.

The joint criminal enterprise is being rightly named with great concern by embassies and international organisations that protect journalists as a serious attack on media freedom.

The tendency to criminalize the media for a seemingly personal critic, Princeton made it personal. We're not even dealing with the Tong of Princeton's words, which we've long since not heard, or we've heard it recently used only in the Special Court.

Princeton's excusing letter, the First patriarchal Lord, will always be there to protect the woman's honor from anyone who touched her and her heart.

There are several words that sound and seem to be lies in the writing of Princeton Sadri,

One:

“I understand the weight of my status posted last night (Which is justified by some)”

Mr. First, he's not even willing to apologize for labeling the media as criminal enterprise. The above word means these actually The NPK's gone wrong.

The first self story of President's zealous work;

“Every day I'm a witness to the work done by Vjosa with such devotion, zeal, loyalty to all citizens of this country” (File).

The parent may personally witness the work of the President, but there may be another million publicly who have the right to question the President's work, and that does not automatically make them criminals.

What remains of concern is the silence of Kosovo's president, Mrs. Vjosa Osmani to such labels by First Lord.

As for the Foreign Ministry, we're talking nothing.

The question that worries is, how many democracy kill these blind bullets like these people kill the media. Organised media lynching campaigns, by powerful people, may not seem to erode democracy right there, but its results can have consequences.

The example of thedon that journalists' criticism of the woman President knows the response to another ʹpetek (who is he?) are tending to suspend democracy (at times).

I don't even want to take the examples of journalists' intimidation around the world. But why not, even in Kosovo. That's a lot. A few days ago, the most aggressive people in the world responded to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who stressed the commitment of democratic states to fight such trends around the world - in effect: he declared war on the media.

The silence of local institutions for Rastin Princeton is bad news for our democracy. But this bad news, however slightly dims the good news: the reaction of many institutions and international figures to protect journalists.

* In a long - published article in the NY Times, on contradiction John Bolton, the prestigious American newspaper begins the article:

“The good news is, he says what he thinks, what is bad?