Where are you going, Zana?

(Examples: Dafina Demak) Zana Avdiu may have interpreted her criticism of Granit Jaka's gesture, not properly, so she was misinterpreted, but massive links to it indicate that we are the society of violence, for violence. Interestingly, every time they face soccer Serbia and Switzerland, many of us or everyone, [...]
Zana Avdiu may have interpreted her criticism of Granit Jaka's gesture, not as it should, so she was misinterpreted, but massive links to it show that we are a society of violence, for violence.
It is extremely interesting, that every time they face football Serbia and Switzerland, many of us or everyone, we experience as a match between Kosovo and Serbia. The presence of Granit Jaka and Gerdan Shaqiri there wrapped up with their ethnic affiliation led us to watch a football game all over the World, and people like me, who don't watch football often. And when Switzerland prevails, despite the Irish situation in our football nationals (Albania, Kosovo), we experience a sense of joy, prides that led us to the town.
But we put aside everything that happened that night and we come back to what happened last night.
What is it?Touching the genius organ A gesture directed to the Serbian pancaina during the Swiss match Serbia.
Each of us, regardless of our daughter or son, is not that when we see such an act, it is something we like. So, it's not an act we can interpret as a voicecater. But Jaka's act that night reasons with our nationalist burden (or was milder: our history) and the circumstances of that game: that Jaka faced insults, physical attacks, etc. Despite this, all of this is not yet the reasoning of such an act, but we nevertheless accepted it as an effect on what we had all done (like. )
Zana's mistake in reaction was that she doesn't shareThe mean act. byAct from a punk. For the interpretation of Xana that it was sexual assault, I disagree, but that doesn't mean I'm not willing to hear the opposite arguments.
For the massive exorcation of our society, and a photograph with such content, I agree with Zana.
Let's go back to the streets.
There's no strangers in our society.
The very person who today is prime minister of Kosovo, Mr. Albin Kurti has often been criticised fordeeds of street rage While in opposition (the tear gas, attack on institutions) But those MPs who have criticised Kurt for having been in the streets have not faced this massive invasion of society. So, rugraci is normal in our social record. We hear it too often, in almost every second session of the Kosovo Assembly.
So, it's all so scary nonsense, massive links to Zana Avdiu today.
A society with cold blood would be able to write Zana that why she thinks differently than she does, but a society that called for justice four days ago for the murder of Hamide Magash and today threatens Zana with the analogy of this murder is frightening.
What society enjoyed the massive demand for justice for Hamid a few days ago, and today, with unique hooliganism, did Zana face murder threats? So, what's the truth? The first four days, or this one? And this Monday?









