Dialogue as the snare and snares of dialogue

1) Kosovo dialogue ʹ Serbia as once even now will be at the centre of attention for a first priority and will be difficult to eclipse or bypass any other good or negative topics. Those who have said dialogue will not be a priority have a lot of money and have been rewarded by many votes. How come? Yeah, well. Not only during the recent campaign, Kosovo's citizen, tired of prolonged dialogue, has been forced to the impression that dialogue if it is not a priority today will open up opportunities tomorrow to fix jobs that deal with the quality of his life. Typical populist trap.

2) Kurt as yesterday in opposition, such as today in Government has spoken and addressed political forces now in opposition not only as corrupt and criminal, not only thanks to Montenegro for staying longer in power, but also as the opposition who has made deals with Vucinqi to give Serbia land. This gear continues today, now formalized. How come this government now has this approach to invite these opposition, thieves, traitors and criminals into dialogue. How can this opposition help dialogue with Serbia? So for this invitation, government towards the opposition, there's no room for logic, so it's insincere. Just a trap to put the opposition in it.

3) Kurti government is Eurofile. It is more than any government, spirit, concept or politics in Kosovo and earlier. In the case of dialogue, this government prefers Brussels more than the US. That is not why dialogue is conducted in Brussels, nor why the EU supports and organises this process, not that would be normal, because it has been that way before. Not even though something has changed for the better in Brussels in relation to Kosovo. No. That's because Kurt as a politician and the government he leads have created political thinking now how many years that many bad things have happened in this country are responsible for them as well as the United States. It's never been said that straight but it's always been left to understand by itself. Kurti's government has so far taken the hand of this political nonsense with loads of eurofiles to the detriment of the United States, to fight well and sell recently that it was only to the Tramp Administration and it's not the same as the Biden Administration. My impression is that with what the United States is doing today with Kurti, it is an attempt to protect him from its anti-Americanism, of course for the good of Kosovo. The U.S. in the dialogue, for now, are more waiting for what Kurt will do than co-ordinated with what needs to be done. It's never been like this before.

4) Can the Association of Serbian municipalities be multiethnic, so it is not only Serbian. No. This is just good theoretical finding to escape hard practice. This is a refusal offer to create opportunities for dialogue to be prolonged. This is also an offer of a kind of political card or joker to create opportunities to even get out of the dialogue altogether. In Kosovo and the Balkans, the problems were and are ethnic. In the first place, Europeans will not agree, rather Brussels. In Euro-Western political culture, the idea that even with particular institutions, as well as particular legal concepts, must be protected by minority rights is very strong and long-term and consolidated. So it is very difficult to counter this European thinking and political culture for ethnic protection with multiethnic approach as an offer. Of course, Serbia will reject this amount and emphasis. On the other hand, if Kurti and VV were prominent in their long-term work in the opposition, with an effort to protect and strengthen communities' rights in Kosovo, perhaps some previously-delighted trust in the Serb community, would help the project. But Kurt never knew how to do that. At least because of this approach, it has failed to start that nominally recognised that, first we will make dialogue within Kosovo with the Serb community here. Of course, Serbs have found this a trap to be overlooked.

5) For now it can be said that Kurti Government is not transparent in terms of dialogue. The most important thing is that you're going to have to know more about what's on the table, at least something more than is known at the moment. But to say it in a balanced way, maybe some things aren't even about making public, because they can damage the process. But when I'm tried to make such a conclusion, I remember how deliberate and unconventional, and unconventional, have raised to citizens with falsehood and sincerity, for all past governments, the VV and Kurti, in terms of the process of dialogue, and that exactly revolts me. Not why the VV and the current prime minister have done such things once, and today they are doing the opposite when they are in government, but why with this populist policy they have won votes, many votes. At least now it would take for the same reasons to lose political sympathy, which the hand in the heart is losing faster than even the most strict opponents of this government have hoped.