How should Shefqet Krasniqi be condemned for sexism?

I don't believe in any of the defendants' ambushes, Shefqet Krasniqi, expressing feminist attitudes. I don't believe anyone, anyone, expects from a hoja, any hoja, that expresses feminist attitudes.

I am bluntly saying what we all know: Islam, like two other Abrahamic religions, is essentially the sexist first from any feminist perspective. And beyond that point, if it can go beyond the core, there's a long and terrifying story of women's oppression. A pressure made from every sect of the right against every woman.

Hence, with a reaction to a certain sexist statement of a hodge, it originally means covering up the blatantic sexism that represents the very existence of the hodge and religion. Especially in our country.

But there is something far more important. It is a specific form of this reaction that is simply condemning the presence of the hoja in the public debate.

This specific reaction is first telling us the automatic brand in which Kosovo feminism is placed on social networks. Using almost complete theoretical indeterminacies, as well as ideological inflows, this feminism in the demand for mobilization becomes pseudo-feminism, and as such too adoptable and too flexible, as there is no other than Kosovo.

And exactly this mobilization leads to his exclusive, unpolitical character.

I don't know any feminists or feminists that don't have sexist leftovers. Even the more he has read in the field of gender studies, the more he is aware of those remains. Suppose most of us are still given the names of our father's family, not that of our mother or father. And there's no demand that this change. Some of us, women, still add their last name to the man's until this happens to men. Few of us have expressed disappointment with Albanian toxic nationalism and have opposed sexist historical figures. On the contrary, we continue to anthem them. Few of us have expressed dissatisfaction with the Albanian anthem, which has sexually exclusive language.

So we're not Puritans in feminism. Nor can we be considering the narrowness of the tongue. But it is important to have radical attitudes. And to have radical attitudes does not necessarily mean to express them with radical methods. Having radical attitudes, depending on the very attitudes of course, implies understanding them from their roots. Don't be so cool.

So we must be clear radicals defined in what we believe simultaneously and receptive to those who have other beliefs. Roger, first of all, because except we don't know the roots of our feminist beliefs that we're still learning basics.

And being in this highly exclusive automatic gear, that leads to the currently absurd demand for feminist combs. A requirement that underscors the amount of commitment to expanding the field of war for equality.

We need to understand that we're trapped inside a language and language policy that needs to change. With plenty of insults, insults, phrases, names, words, thongs, meanings, and sexist meanings. And since language is a social event that only exists by being in common, and therefore understandable, sexism is hard to save. And this is the area that needs to be expanded with urgency.

In the Hodge interview, Krasniqi was not surprised by the separation of gender bases that made space for him. In fact, what really surprised me is that this hodge rightly denounced the discrimination of women in Leka Dukagjin's canon. This also shows us that radical and disfellowshipped methods that express undefinitional, secular attitudes must be changed. Instead of the exception that can potentially produce great and powerful counter-responsion or simply proselytize in the KPprivate space of the discussion, it would have to be promoted to inclusion and confrontation.

Our society is clearly divided into two groups. In conservatives and liberals. The conservatives, even though the overwhelming majority, have a very small involvement in the public sphere. And liberals, although overwhelming minorities, have dominant involvement. This inevitable produces a sense of depression and then even disinheritation in the conservative part of society.

Emincipation I believe is clear to each other in capitalist countries flows just as capital itself: vertically, from above. Generally, it's people who have more wealth and opportunity to get a better education and access to this product. Hence, exclusive approach, in addition to directly attacking the most economically harmful part of society, women, and men together, also severely restricts the space for emancipation.

Therefore, punishment for hoe sexism is not to be made from liquefied to prolong our snorkeling laramania. To have feminism in public on one side, and tolerable sexism in private spaces. The Hoxhans must be punished by the liquefiation for all social emancipation. The penalty should be that Shefqet Krasniqi is handed over to the Canun's denoun to share the same principles in denouncing Islamic practices and even denouncing himself.

Everyone, however poor, has a right to access emancipation.