The Honor of Vjosa Osman

If we were looking for any advanced car words of ours in public and private talk, I don't think there would be another multi-rocket word that would compete “corruption”. But although the use of the word is so massive, its meanings remained too narrow.

It seems that this narrowness is preserved by such fanaticism by politics that it attempts to avoid any consideration of the usage of the word, the bed where its meanings and implications lie, and certain cultural and social features.

Corruption as a word thus takes on some self-understanding. But this self-understanding has no connection with the rigidities of meaning since etimology, or with the natural sense of similar images in society. It is a self-understanding pushed forward by all the political parties so far, and by nearly all analysts and opinionists.

Behind meaningful poverty, it is clear that there is a specific economy of words enabled by dominant ravages that require mobilization and narrowness, and that have hostility with any confusion and complexity. Albin Kurti has been declared populist by all his political rivals. In fact, they themselves are populist if we observe their talks. The only difference is Kurt is the best populist.

It was not enough simply to say that Hashim Thaci was corrupt. All meanings that did not link corruption with his person were to be closed. So it had to form some understatement that he was the very cause of corruption in politics. Otherwise, the purpose and entire structure of the prosecution were destroyed. Otherwise, far away, it threatened to expose the system itself.

Thus, Albin Kurti and Vyosa Osman won these choices. Not through ideas, but through the perception of their personalities. Because the race turned into a race of personalities, and quite naturally, it also reflected Kurt and Osman himself.

This lure, of course, lies in deception. Corruption is not simply related to the honesty or dishonesty of certain persons. If so, there would be no need for all those mechanisms in the most democratic countries that prevent and fight corruption. He wouldn't need that many rules. Just an honest personality would suffice to put things right. But their basics are more complex than that. The prevailing anthropological concept that legitimizes these mechanisms and rules of use of power is different from the prevailing religious anthropological concept in our country.

*

In a BBC presentation, the president was asked where she distinguished from Kosovo's old [guard] politicians. The answer, as expected, was very close. She said she discerned in <x0 very many forms” but managed to mention only two: she was anti-corruption and she kept the word [is consistent].

Let's repeat: Vjosa Osmani said he stood out from other politicians because he was against corruption and because he kept his word. A viewer beyond this context that carries a serious religious need may logically ask: which politician says is pro-corruption and says he does not keep his word?

The victim was trapped within this context that operates with religious concepts. She looked for confidence in the international seer. The belief that her word was true while the word of the untily rulers was not true.

I see no problem saying at the BBC, or any international media, that Kosovo is mired in corruption. That's true! The problem is simply an expression of such a conclusion and of its endless repetition. This shows the politician's inadequacy about his position. It should further lay the arguments, talk about cause, and lay the ideas on solving the problem. Talk about economic policy. To show that these mechanisms that fight corruption will not limit development opportunities.

What Osman said last week is practically the banal sentence as follows: we are the same ideologically, but I am honest and they were not honest.

But, through her honesty, she is finally trying to become president of the country until at the same time she is trying to establish a political party that currently exists in the Adamic phase with her own name [List Vjosa]. This is brutally against the constitutional spirit, even more than the constitution supposes to be the right president.

*

So far, corruption has been given an surname. Corruption in Kosovo is also in place. But no matter how deep this corruption is, there is no consideration of its specifics that distinguish it from corruption in other countries.

What we can understand from last night's interview with Osman, is that we will have another politician unprepared to deal with this negative phenomenon. A politician who does not understand or care to understand.

Corruption exists even in the world's most democratic liberal states. And it will exist. The most basic issue is not to violate individual rights and freedoms until this war occurs. And at the same time, don't hinder development. The other basic issue is for this war to happen, and to be clearly serious.

In contrast to Osman, who clearly fails to reson beyond an educational system victim, Kurt has repeatedly mentioned corruption in society, which indicates a slightly higher awareness. But so little is enough to go beyond religious ghosts.

Just being honest in politics is not honest. You should be pretty good. Otherwise, he picks up an entire nation.