Court hearings are set for Gani Geci on charges of Ruzhi Shaqiri's murder

Judge Radoslav Markovic announced that the first retrial hearing for the case has scheduled for 30 March of this year, at 10:00.

This is the first session scheduled since the return of this case to the retrial by the Court of Appeals in September 2017.

The Constitutional Court in Mitrovica, on 3 June 2016, had sentenced Gani Gecin to 4 years and 6 months in prison for the murder of Ruzhdi Shaqiri.

He is accused of committing it in the <x0-> capefact NQosh”, in the center of Scytheright, on August 4, 2014.

Geci had admitted to committing this murder, saying that he had committed it in self - defense after claiming that he was in danger of being killed.

Following the first - degree ruling, the Court of Appeals had considered the complaints of the parties, on September 26, 2017, and the case had turned into retrial.

In the act of Appeals, provided by “Justice Vow fight”, it was said that the first degree court has not approved the mention of criminal acts under the amended indictment in “the serious assassination”, since it was not clear which criminal act it has declared guilty.

According to the ruling, by the legal appointment of the criminal act according to the device of the indictment, it turns out that the accused has been found guilty of the criminal offence of “murder”, while by describing incriminating actions, respectively, facts and circumstances that constitute the criminal work figure turns out that the accused has acted in a state of severe mental shock, countering those that, according to the second degree, make the law device unintellable.

These contradictions and vagueities are so pronounced in the judgment that they make it unclear, confused and judicially unstable and that they present essential violations of the penal procedure provisions, which provide grounds for annulment of the court, because they are of absolute nature and cannot be averted in this procedure, because they make it impossible to assess the legality of the bias in words”, it was said in the Act of Appeal.

Meanwhile, with this decision, the complaints of the injured Halime Shaqiri and her authorised representative, lawyer Sokol Dobgurna, Apel, had been named as unsullied