Who really lost the local elections?

Local elections ended. I don't want to deal with who won and who lost, because every day we're realizing that beyond organizational methods, logos on advertising strategies (PR), our parties don't really distinguish from each other. But what did this choice teach us?

It is clear that Albin Kurti's party lost two hundred and a thousand votes. But that was meant to happen. For ten years now, Alby Kurti has promoted an extremely shallow, intermediate ratio between him and his citizens. He with his political subject, where each member is more false profile than the other, has forced citizens to make extremely arbitrary and even fascist judgments for politicians: appearance, speech, emphasis and an acceptable structure of words.

This condemned his candidate for Mitrovica, Agim Bahtirir, who was the victim of an absolutely terrible primitive antifutage that made him a terrifying surface judgment, completely overshadowing his ruling for eight years with the municipality in question. No one knew what mayor had been for eight years Bahtiri, but they all rushed to describe him as <x0 varalphabet”.

In view of this form of judgment, a terribly weak candidate like Arben Vitita was offered to head Pristina. In times of pandemic, he had to resign from the position of minister of health. And this minister, operating without a health minister for a month and a half, at a time when Covid's new mutations can cause new waves of infection and death. Arben Vitita had a reputation, had a very serious speech, an acceptable voice, and had adopted the standard structure of Albin's sentences quite well. But he had no idea and therefore lost to a candidate like Progress Rama, who we have no idea who is politically or what I'm going to do.

Candidate Objection

But this trick is already understood by the old parties. Even those indisposed to reform right now are subjecting to that surface ratio of citizenship that produces terribly unacceptable judgments. They offered good candidates, even from some of Albin Kurt's supporters. But in fact, these candidates were just a few people who would do well in viewing the population's banal judgments.

Despite the millions our political parties receive from Kosovo's budget each year, no serious ideas were offered that would slightly expand this superficial party/citizen report. On the other hand, in Kamenica, where the upsurgent chairman was pushing forward reform in education, resistance triumphed over this reform.

As you may have heard, the US is hosting an event called “for the first time Summit of Democracy” This comes after the sad events that seriously affected the very existence of democracy in the United States, and the constant fluctuations of other developed Western democracies by populism. Imagine now how fragile Kosovo is to certain anti-democratic phenomena.

Even in Kosovo these local elections witnessed a setback in our internal process of consolidating democracy. On one hand, we had an alarming lack of developmental ideas and on the other part of the fight between fake Facebook profiles.

If before we had candidates with scandalous candidates, we already have candidates who are just some bodies subject to the illiterate mass that did not know what it wanted, and subject to their respective leaders. “The past” scandal was likely not in what scandalized but in scandal. That was an authentic sign that had to be removed from the candidate.

Where does the current flow lead us? In an even more false democracy, where the ratio between politicians and citizens becomes even more intersected and more superficial, with great pleasure being subjected to all our political parties.

The People's Objection

And this disunitation of candidates that reached the peak of this election also led to the disuniting of the people.

Of course, the popular term “” is only using it conditioned within irony with its use and making it Kosovo's prime minister. I believe the very term “popular” is desubjective of citizens. But it doesn't matter.

The excuse that Albin Kurti made for the loss is important. He cited “internal effects” and “the reunification of other political parties” against it.

I don't want to deal with whether or not these reasons stand. I want to deal with the bed on which both lie to understand the prime minister's view of our democracy. As you can see in the excusing sentence, but even in the other sentences he said during these two days, the people themselves are subject to all of their subjectivity. He is either deceived by other parties or by them. He does not choose and does not know how to choose.

This is also the logic behind thousands of fake Facebook profiles (which effectively build up opinions hundreds of times faster and more than television analysts), and the logic behind the total inhuman instrumentization that he has made to members of his party from top and down.

In a document distributed with reliable people, it was reportedly reportedly inexplicably that Kurt had sought the use of false profiles and false news to deceive 45% of the people he considered illiterate.

But even if it doesn't, Kurti on a TV show a few years ago has admitted that “further simplifies disk” in order to mobilise the measure. Is that not the same thing?

Kosovo wants foundations of democracy that the European Union has laid on its heels. But, as we have been given last year, even the most consolidated democracy in the world (U.S.) may be in danger of falling completely. Perhaps learning is more valuable in our case than Afghanistan, a country that fell after leaving America as if it were a home of paper. Even there the Afghans ' path to democracy was hailed, but it proved to be a farce altogether. And there's the current fate of our democracy: self-enlightened politicians, with no idea whatsoever, that advance the overall political course, and that work like robots in what they are told within the framework of the protection of this very system.

Kosovo organises good elections and no incidents because no one seriously violates interests. If democracy were more conservative, the work would change. But since it is, more and more of what we call politics is becoming a <x0-meth game” played by children who simulate the adult world.