EU Stallation Report

The European Commission countries' annual report, released this Tuesday (October 19th), is the main Brussels document with which developments in states intended to become members of the European Union.

It is this comprehensive analysis of the achievements, successes, entanglements and failures of each single country, which, in fact, cannot be translated into government plans for the following year of these countries.

For this reason, it is usually conveyed to numerous political debates in these countries, often with parliamentary ones, while if the content of this report, in general, appears with more critical qualities than the preliminary report, then there may be even more serious clashes on that state's political scene.

Of course, anyone who has read the annual reports (formerly entitled as Progress Reports) knows that the language used, with very rare exceptions, is noted with special caution, discretion and discipline, so to get to a classical conclusion of this report, it takes a special political and diplomatic master.

However, for some years now, the main feature of the European Commission's annual reports is missing, which is unknown even when this fuller communication will be returned between Brussels and the states that claim to be appointed to the EU.

The annual report has been (one can add that even remains to this day), that main EU document that has measured the extent of the transformation of a state that wants to become a member of the European Union, in a literal European society, which not only has embraced the main political, economic, cultural, civilisation (traditional, civilisation) values of Europe, but for more, institutionalised them, with a functional democracy and with real liberalism.

This transformation then, along with that higher political assessment of the EU's higher institutions (European Council), has had to warn the time when a state can receive the official invitation to become an integral part of the big European family.

So, the annual Rapor, there was that crucial technical dimension, upon which that political assessment was built.

Someone here can rightly claim, however, that in the vast majority of EU enlargement cases with the new states, that political assessment has had particular significance, and that (appreciation) is related to Brussels' geopolitical interests, which have always existed, and have been objectively, in a report on dependence even with the North-Atlantic Alliance. Zaten, all former communist camp states that are integrated into the EU, are first involved in Pact membership. NATO, then, in the EU.

However, as already highlighted, now four years, the European Commission's annual Report no longer aims at demonstrating that key technical position on what it stands for with a state, when it is talking about its likelihood of entering the EU within a set deadline.

So this logic is no longer in force. Become an evopian state, in all possible aspects, and then, as Brussels' response to all of your achievements, you will become an EU member state.

Of course, making a real European state would have to be the vital interest of each of these countries separately, because something like that, Zata, is at the core of any pre-election campaign and the program of each government. However, there is no doubt that the European Union membership bid has been a major driver for the political scenes of these states, and for deep political and economic reforms in these countries.

So, annual reports have, in essence, had, even the role of a pre-contradiction between a Presidential State and the EU, because there are clearly all the criteria that this state must meet in the future, to reach even the real legal and political contract for integration of that state into the European Union.

This feature no longer has this report, which was actually seen in the Declaration of the EU Summit and the Western Balkans that was held before weeks in Brdo, Slovenia.

As the political will of the EU member states is previously linked to this overall technical assessment of the EU government (what is another Commission besides Government), now, how many years, the attitude, assessment and political will of these states (the size of larger ones), is Alpha and the EU Omega in front of these would-be EU members.

As things stand now, throughout this third deceny of this century, which has started this year, we will have every year European Commission reports on the overall situation in each of these countries, while not knowing whether there will be any expansion of the EU with the states of the Western Balkans.

This is a conclusion to the EU's impasse over the Western Balkans.