Can we manage ourselves?

Can we get out of the crisis ourselves without outside support? I'm asking this question because there's more and more and more a mood in us that favors self - control, the idea that we, above all, should rely on our own strength. This mood is reflective because of frustrations with the slowdown of the [...] process.
Can we get out of the crisis ourselves without outside support?
I'm asking this question because more and more of this is showing in us a mood that favors self-sufficientness, the idea that we, first of all, must We rely on our own strength. This mood is reflective because of frustrations with the slowdown in the process of universal recognition of Kosovo's independence. Slowing Down Now it's getting even more disturbing because it's entered a deadlock, which The last remnants of 2008's hope and enthusiasm never cease that Summarydin the famous call to the legendary martyr Adam Jashar: “Bac, done! ”
Today, in the mist, you hear the call.rIronically: “Bac, we lost our way into the yard! ”
In the mistn Location loses confidence inAllies. To those who Saved during the war, which then, in The critical moments of supervised peace split the path of independence, which usually does not open up easily and quickly for small countries. We didn't understand what extraordinary bridges were President George Bush's words: “Enough is enough, Kosovo is independent!”
For us “Boll me! Kosovo is independent! ” has been what our anger has been With UNMIK and Para power!The el that Serbia had organised in northern Mitrovica and in Serb enclaves inside Kosovo.
However, the president Bush didn't understand half the world. With rivalising and anti-American trends, because in the UN and in some influential institutions, it was not considered common to declare the mutual “ ” of the independence of a territory that was part of the state sovereignUN member.
The fact that Serbia was charged as aggressor and guilty of massacres and mass population deportations Albanians as unacceptable genocide policy to the part of their citizens -- even though NATO's humanitarian intervention in Kosovo has been motivated -- has not been enough to convince many states. UN members approve of declaration of independence Kosovo.Their reason for rejection has also been the fact that these unconvincing states have problems with sensist demands of Minorities That Live in English - language parts them. They want to be cut off because they are violently held in the name of The protection of sovereignty.
Kosovo case so viewed as precedent i Dangerous who, if you want Legalized in International Practice, It caused rebellion and fragments The chain of many sovereign states, so it was alarmed, and it is done today, that Kosovo's model risks numerous crises and a global chaos.
The world's publicisation over the Kosovo issue is huge. On one side Most of the West and NATO member states, as and dozens of Western Allied states have recognised Kosovo as irreversible reality, already rejected by several blocs of other states, money i All from Russia and China, sided with Serbia.
This polarisation has helped Serbia keep Kosovo's independence conflict alive and, thanks to Russia and China, the active role of the UN and Security Council, where they are still heldChoose a working directoryncat e srFog reviewing developments in Kosovo even after declaring independence, which currents continuously Resolution 1244 of 1999 and UNMIK, even though it's actually a mouseion downsized in Ground.
UNMIK seems to Today as a fanatic that artificialIt was kept alive, but neither the United States, Great Britain and France, who have veto power on the Security Council, were able to undo this.Mission, because this still doesn't allow the axis of world order, Really outdated, often unfunked.SInonal and blocker, but it can't be changed easily.
Polarising the world over Kosovo issue has conditioned that part as well of the story that is most painful to us, that even the verdict Unfortunately, the JND's non-obligative that Kosovo's 2008 declaration of independence has not been a violation of international law, not too heavy. We were forced to enter dialogue with Serbia for Normalizing reports between the two countries, which our allies at the helm with the US, have thought they could. Function If the case comes outiThe EU's mediating task. The decision logic has been this: with Kosovo and Serbia learning EU membership, and the EU at the Thessaloniki summit (2003) declared that the Balkan region is welcome to Doneet part of EU, let it handle The EU as a practically internal issue.
UN's responsibilities match It was in Brussels. a Western maneuver for resolving the conflict to take place under the umbrella of Brussels, as considered vital issues of Europe's security and stability. The EU is economic and political superpowers, and if Kosovo makes it internal issues -- Russia and China -- so neither the UN -- could ever again contest a positive result of the dialogue brokered by Brussels.
Granted, the strategic thinking of the West has known even in 2010 that EU countries are not unique in the stance about Kosovo's independence, which 5 member states of Kosovo Its, even NATO members, do not recognise Kosovo's independence, which so far has not changed its stance. It has been known at the outset that this greatly reduces EU opportunities to be efficient in the task that He called. As in UN, Serbia had allies of Russia and China blocking Know Kosovo's universal, Serbia in the EU had 5 allied states for its cause. Because of them, the EU will maintain to this day the neutral position on Kosovo status, which for many The issue blocks Kosovo and favours Serbia.
This fact has not been the only reason for failure Plan to avoid UN holding the issue and dialogue on sightIOfficial Brussels branches?
When parsed dWAdding dialogue to us is not considered an important context of that time, which gave him hope Strategic planners that EU, by lawhChoose a working directorycan succeed in the task of resolving The issue of Kosovo independence. We must remember that the EU was then committed to one The process of empowering its cohesion as a organiIt's a complex sound.Focusing on increasing cohesionint and in functions Shared to the Superstate, e Shut it offalso on the delic casethat of the way Decisions, which is based on consensus All member states. EU was planning approval 1 The Constitution called the Lisabon Constitution, which was foreordained Most efficient decision-makingiqiite LargeWQualified of votes. If this constitution were approved by 5 EU members who do not recognise Kosovo, they could not block the EU with the qualified majorityR to recognise Kosovo after 22 sidesThey already knew him! Constitution Lisbon had to go into effect in 2014, but referenda in several member states failed.
When the scenario of exploiting nonconsensual decisions failed, the question of dialogue Brussels had started with the UN mandate, strategic leadership, but informal, Germany received, even personally the cancSoup Angela Merkel, with oneThe next application planMine to Serbia's membershipW EU condition on recognition bilateral with Kosovo with Margins existingW two seats.
On it Really pressure directed at Serbia, told him that the moment you openedCouldn't read port for %s membership, Serbia must knowOhW Kosovo pChoose a working directoryas the EU no longer wants membership of countries having conflicts Territorial Or that they know not one another.i.
However, even this change of scenario did not succeed, because in the meantime, the EU faced the refugee crisis that it faced. It was flooded by Lee.Life and Africa, and so Other factors contributed to the complete loss of the will of some countries for Expand EU, which mainly hit The Western Balkans.
Under these Kosovo-Serbia dialogue circumstances, which by 2013 reached a promising agreement, there was no more yChoose a working directoryStays No Substantial Progress but Just StalledYou're, like, blockades and failures. We The dialogue also lost meaning, sidOnot in Kosovo where popular politics exploited the failure of dialogue for opinion manipulations and as a power-coming instrument. Deals That Reached Government, especially that of the Association Serbian municipalities, but also demarcation with Montenegro, were Useed to undermine the dialogue process, presenting his results as Betrayal i Leadership Kosovo's corrupt and servileS(front) i First Hashim Thaci and Isa Mustafa...Meaning of liberalisation regimevisa for Kosovo, even pWr The EU's reduction and lack of credibility (then S.hBA-i), especially since Austria's diplomacy and EU negotiator Moghrin proved the inauguration of a shortcut to Kosovo agreement Serbia based on the idea of exchanging territories, where parts Kosovo North to Exchanged Part of the Presevo Valley.
This is it. Brief account of the failure of the dialog that created West discrediting platform and empowering empty banners people that Kosovo can out on its own, without friends Misled that dialogue imposes on us fighting for their Meskian interests, harmful to Kosovo. That spirit has motivated ex Prime Minister Kurt to refuse meeting with Delegation Serbia's in the White House.WWashington because he was convinced Whereon he will be forced.as!) accept Kosovo map with knives in it fragmentation In him!
That's meyme is Use, not just from Kurt, for the needs of war Interior for power by disposing dialogue with Serbia as Belgrade's favour and unprincipled pressure on Kosovo, that Hashim Thaci, Isa Mustafa and others be portrayed as A traitor Servile and incompetent, while world leaders involved in promoting dialogue, like meskian figures who do not want us well, and that we must not submit to deceptive demands in ConferencesBerlin or Paris.
In our opinion, these processes have not been able to bring doubt to the role of the EU and later even the Trump administration and the US. In some moments, doubts goNin at extreme, and this reflIt was also shown in opinion. It's not that. Dignified Feelings Thank him. to the West the support we had in 1998-1999, or Sorted in opening order 2008 (independence) and 2010 (G versionPatching...ND- of).
But it was not meant at all why we were constantly and earnestly owed, Keeping alive Dialogue with Serbia, even when it was seen as appearance that Serbia turned it intoTool to buy Time without being interested in reaching the final agreement. In the election that will soon be announced, our political scene enters with this great refrain of confusion with the role that has great powers in failure of dialogue as well as how we should conduct ourselves in the circumstances of not gaining any tangible favour from the dialogue.
Should he stop? Should we talk to ShBA-nW and EU with one language other holding them lexOur naïve strategics, since our elite does not really show Standby that I can thank youace in a voice about issues Interest Largeri?
Can our political elites at least work? for Creating a platformi common rational and analytical plan in all aspects of the new plan Creation to a ladyi Regional economics of six States in the Western Balkans, since after the Agreement Washington September 4th likely to be supported by administration New Bitdeni and the EU as a more concrete proposal, more vulnerable to investments and benefits for every country and for the region as a whole. Can As Evidence of NationalismAlbin Kurti, Enver Hoxhaj, Avdullah Hoti and leaders i Others put aside disputes about power and peace that lasted for just a few months to sit down and listen to things that are most vital to all of us?
The epilogue hard to imagine, but i I have to.If it is understood that yes, we should be dignified and ourselves in negotiations on our fate, but also that the whole process can't get us out.W Win or welcome by being summoned to those puffs Short - oiled, %s: %sEmpty name:sovereigns that we can manage alone, making them <x0... transit” the interests of our friends testified to!
Written specially for “New age”










