What is political development?

Political development. This is the togword that serves as fuel for generating the vast majority of news and debates in our country. This talk has increased the job market by producing journalists, analysts, opinionists, activists and politicians until at one time it has spent the time of non-journalist, nonanalytist, nonopinist, inactive, and unpolitical people. Without political development, the media industry would be wrinkled to alarming proportions unless it was established.

But what is political development?

I think in our case political development is the exact opposite of what it refers to, so it's an unpolitical development. A completely wandering disease that infects only people who speak a specific language and have a set of specific ideas in common.

So this political development that is actually an unpolitical impasse only stems from what we call politicians or political parties. But why is it unpolitical? Because it covers all the antagonisms, divisions, and so do the positions, troubles, ambitions and interests of the citizens, and thus their entire existence. And all of this is political. Our interaction with the world is political. Our private interest is political. Our social and economic position is political.

We go back to a word mentioned earlier: private interest. See the fate of that word within political development. Private interest was widely conceived in contrast to public interest. The honest overreached public interest in his private interest. And for the flow, public interest wasn't the collection of private interests, but be theirs forever. Within religious fanaticism involved in public discourse, private interest was despised because of life, vitality, and force. Meanwhile, public interest in his abstractity of metaphysic concepts is overemphasized by being forever vague, dark, invisible. The reference to this tgword rather than being unconsolidated (as it really is) within the understanding of the specific language became closed, solid and unmistakable.

This showy public interest was generally euphemism for the absurd concept of good “”, while its opposite (not to be confused, opposite “” within this specific language) was “evil”.

But why is seemingly self-politicalization actually de-politicizing citizens?

Viewers of a performance in the theatre until they see a certain theatre show temporarily cut off from all the sections of their private lives. Imagine if these viewers are watching that theater everywhere, on every television and portal. And imagine if the play is not presented as a theatre show but as a political development.

Suppose, at the end of March, Prime Minister Kurti dismissed Interior Minister Agim Veliun because of a statement about the new choreography. It was once said that the declaration sparked fear, and later that it was in sync with the president's plans. That same night, or the day later, the prime minister called a conference on media and spoke about 2 hours on the reasons for dismissal.

Later, however, it turned out that that statement by Veliu had not been the reason behind the dismissal. It was the American pressure Kurti himself promoted his government's dismissal, thus implying that all his reasons for Veliu's dismissal had been false. What was the meaning of those two hours at the media conference? Or what was the meaning of that vicious debate over the matter?

Such vanity is concealed in the overwhelming majority of open debates during this period. And that's exactly what these serial debates were about being serial, all-involved, central, loud-study, even from the events we had evidence of were real.

For example, the pandemic crisis. This crisis was immediately overshadowed by the actions and interpretations of people standing behind, around these so - called ones Political developments. This crisis was chewed and dissolved by the awesome power of the series of debates. One side of brutal messiahry was expressing enthusiasm for managing people as if they were just bodies, in a brutal biopolic that decided and took action according to whims and even sometimes changed them twice a day. The other side demanded strictness and even more brutal violations of citizens' rights and freedoms.

But at least the pandemic showed us the anthropological ideas of political development. Pandemia caused governments and all politics to be compelled to view us as animals. Of course we are animal bodies, but we are not just animal bodies. What mattered was just the spatial distribution of troops. And as we received a recurring call to stay at home, as a dog would be told to catch it. It should be said that this was true in nearly all European countries, excluding Sweden.

The violation of rights and freedoms occurred using pandemic as an excuse. Similarly, permanent coverage of important social and economic issues occurs using major topics as reasoning. For local political development, man is little more than an infectious and efficient body. Being the victim of a weak educational system, he is an infectious and infectious mind.

In fact, a lot of community money was to keep up with news and debates that covered political developments. He had to stand in front of the TV and be ready as a commentator, a voter mobilizing whenever the need was.

Anyway, there's one here anyway. One important anyway. Most citizens do not vote in Kosovo meaning that a large part of them are politically non-voters. Failure to vote and not participate in the futile debates of so-called daily politics is the only serious political engagement currently. Why? The public debate is overly concerned with actions, the absurd words of a handful of people, and this must end. Public debate is currently not public because it serves merely the private interests of this warring handful. It should be expanded strictly as political development should be expanded, becoming precisely political by the involvement of a series of ungratling topics in the fight of political parties.