ALBINISM, the new regime

I'm going to call “Albinism”, what Albin Kurti is promoting. There is much like socialism, communism and other order that is based on political dictates. Yet, it is unique in form and content. This new “regime is not presented directly and transparently to us for facing more criticism and direct rejection by society's largest elite mass. A dangerous experiment would also be described and opposed by Western states, which protect and cultivate the values of democracy more fanatically.

Albinism is introduced to us as a camouflaged race, a democratic race for power and as a political alternative to political parties, which have been consumed by power. So intelligently, the confrontation and debate that should occur in society when there is a tendency to change the country's governing system.

When Albin Kurti calls the old political class not by chance an old regime, we should be attentive, because an intelligent politician never uses words they don't know the meaning of.

With “regim” implies the form of governance, not governance as political concept, and old regimes are considered defeated only through the establishment of the new regime.

Albin Kurti's goal of establishing the new regime is already clear. He has indirectly expressed this through his attitudes, actions, and actions.

First of all, bringing me to the former ruling partner, The LDK, clearly showing that it does not view a stable democratic government as an opportunity for reform. Its goal has never been to implement reforms, but to establish a new regime, the new Republic, which can be done through radical changes to the country's democratic and constitutional order. As mediocre and as radical as a political leader, who agrees to act and compete within the democratic system of power, he would more than retain all means a stable Government what Kurti Government was in the coalition in LDK. On the contrary, Kurt despised this possibility in the worst way, using two elements of albinism that he served as principles.

The first “Parim” was against the flexible LDK positions in relation to strategic partners, the US. He placed the albinist element of the state dignified in international reports and with strategic partners, such as the US. This essence of populist self serves albinism to create the belief that the state is theirs and that no one else, even those friendly states, can get involved in internal affairs. This seems principal if we avoid the internal and external political circumstances, diplomatic, geopolitical and geostrategic circumstances in which we are found in this phase of statehood as a society. This is not anti - Americanism, as it has been called, but albinism and will serve as a basic principle in reporting with any other country in the future.

Albinism as the new experimental regime would be faced with even more external criticism of mostly friendly countries, so the principle of dignified state will be the main weapon of opposing such criticism and pressures. This element affected our society. The feeling citizens felt when they criticized American diplomats and supported Kurt in his attitudes was patriotic. To albinism, however, this civic response was a successful start. Established, pro and against US demands, is the success of breaking a taboo theme for our society. We've considered ourselves the most pro-American society and no one's had the guts to dispute that.

He had not by chance begun this discussion long ago, for he knew that the time would come for him to disseminate this position in the function of life of his ideas about the new regime.

The second “account was that of the leader defending the promoted positions. Reciprocity, though in reality never lived, as an attitude was further protected by fanaticism to highlight Albin as dignified and invincible leaders in relation to state interests. In fact, this is nothing more than a populist element of albinism, which serves it to build individual cult, which is a feature of regimes where it is inspired for “Albinism”, the new regime.

Output: If foreign policy has so far been planned, co-ordinated and implemented with the recommendation and support of the main sponsor of the independence of the Republic of Kosovo, the US, with which our politicians have been co-operating without citizen pressure, because pro-Americanism has been praised as the value of society, albinism has once and for all managed to change this report. There will be polarization over this context for a long time in our society. Our politicians and diplomats should take this into account and take care of the opinion against society. On the other hand, the US will use its own diplomacy tools from pressure to various sanctions to achieve its goals in our region. The cost of these “Albinism again” will be high for a small state like Kosovo, internationally still unknown!

“Albinism” does not exist as a purpose. It is also being transformed into political strategies to make it possible to come to its fulfillment and life. In the case of the coalition's collapse with the LDK, this strategy shows up to some of the traditional elements of political strategies. For all political scientists, it is more clear that in a political process, the part that has strategies always wins. The first element in Albin's strategy in this case was “befasia”. So, surprise attack. Attacking at the most inappropriate moment, secretly, and in the most sensitive terrain so that the blame would remain an orphan or possibly dressed the opponent. Similarly, the second element was noted: “forward and Sundo”. After that, the third element: “vikmitize, to benefit”.

The strategy so far was successful. The LDK was brutally attacked at the most difficult moment. Sudden, she had only one way out. So the path he followed was very predictable. It was brutally blamed for bringing down Government in time of pandemic. Her reaction was not unique because the attacker had predicted the rift, directly touching the party leadership's open wound. Opposition to this action by LDK's most popular figure, Vjosa Osmani, made it impossible The LDK also has an opportunity to reason on the opinion. Thus Albin was victimised and would receive any potential and planned sympathy for this strategy. While the price of damage would be to pay the real victim, the LDK. This damage would also be strategic, because it is understandable that the only path left to the LDK was co-operation with President Thaci. Of course, this would not be liked by LDK membership, as Thaci is known as the traditional political opponent of the LDK.

The strategy was also aimed at the maximum benefit in the function of albinism, thereby introducing albinism towards its final and irreversible phase of victory or defeat, without any among them. Coalition breakup with LDK and red lines set for PAN leaves no room for another route, so the final campaign was prepared: ” the people's government with 51%”. This campaign clearly covered Kurt's main goal - the establishment of Albinism as the new form of regime. Other actions reflecting camouflaged albinism will be observed in the behavior and actions or inactions of the last days of this government on duty.

Purges and political seizures, arbitrary downloads, where boards “pavarura” and other political and non-political appointments were action in the form of “mililice”, according to the political dictatorship and the defined time. The most eloquent example is the appointment of experts from “, independent” on board, who since the very first days of their work made decisions according to the Supreme Leader's political will, which he later emerged and promoted as his successes. This is the model of albinism governance, the new regime. The model that clearly implies that it is not democratic at all and cannot be applied in a democratic state.

The organization for sabotage and exercise of pressure on free media are several other forms of action displayed by albinism, proving that this form of new regime has no sensitivity to even the fundamental values of democracy.

The recidences of the Constitution and open advertising for the rejection of the Constitutional Court's decisions represent other spread elements, which very clearly show that the values of the new regime -- albinism -- are inconsistently contrary to the values of institutionalisation in democratic systems.

Allowing mass citizens to assemble for political purposes and banning collection for any other reason at the time of management with the pandemic included the tendency of albinism for political division of citizens and low sensitivity for citizens' rights and equality. This form of political differentiation has no place in Western democracy.

Even acts of provocation with historical values, such as provoking Shkelzen Gashi in the quality of prime minister's adviser for The NLA, outlines the goal of reducing and eliminating any value of the past. This is the logic of albinism, under which the established values should be destroyed and replaced with the new “, with those of Albinism, which, like any other non-democratic regime, needs to set up its Lapidians. History teaches us the main properties of the regimes based on individual cult or the myth of the leader is the degradation of the historical values of society.

Such representations of Albinism are recent. So much so that we have neither the time nor the patience to analyze as a society to understand the symbolics and the consequences.

Albinism has already started walking openly like a ghost on the streets of Pristina and being served as a cure for our wounds, disappointments and expectations. But, in fact, he only offers us the bread, Krip and Alb!

What is noted and can be argued by Albin's appearance, actions and actions is clear: the goal is to create a new regime, a new form of government, which is resulting in full opposition to the democratic and historical values of our society.

We can err in politics or in political selection and improve our mistakes, because we live in a democratic country. Our democracy, although young and full of defects, is the main tool that enables us to protect ourselves from dark political goals. It made the policy dependent on the citizen and therefore the sovereignty of its citizens. We cannot harm the values of democracy for any price, for together we will also violate fundamental freedoms.

We must remember that history has shown that undemocratic regimes have been created using democratic means. But these regimes, such as these, can no longer collapse democratic means, because they deny the values of democracy. They are thus destroyed only by uprisings, which produce serious consequences for society!

Eventually, no politician, party leader or political subject operating within democratic values harms our society and state. Instead, it only enrichs democracy. In this context, neither Albin nor his political subject, unless they violate the country's democratic, constitutional and institutional order!