Albin Kurti is extreme right politician

We all know because we experienced in part on our backs that communist regimes in the Balkans (and not only) had the strange tendency to dance in fascism, the full ideological opposite of themselves. For a long time I believed that this leap from Communism to fascism was as unnatural as breaking the laws of nature itself.

Such a thing, unfortunately, has happened and is happening in Kosovo. The Vetevendosje movement continues to insist that it is a left-wing party (and even its activists called for revolution by disdaining repressive democracy), and on occasion it says it is central left, but actually its own engine and the engine of every mass protest organised by it was nationalism, and its ideological profile, like methodology, hate speech, political action, is identical to that of the rightist parties in Europe.

Albin Kurti opposed signing the Ramboullet Agreement in 1999. According to him, its signature meant treason against the war of freedom that could be achieved by self - force. Thus, according to his attitude, the humiliation of our nation's dignity and pride began here.

But this is what American diplomat Henry Kissinger wrote in Daily Telegraph June 28, 1999:

“Ramboullett Texast, which urged Serbia to accept NATO troops throughout Yugoslavia, was a provocation -- an excuse to launch shelling. Ramboullet would not accept a better and more angelic Serb. ”

So that agreement constituted a tactical act designed to lead as it did to Kosovo's liberation. But Kurt wanted war.

Kurti was also against the Ahtisaari Pack, even to that extent that it sparked violent protests on February 10th of 2007. This opposition led to the death of two people and the injury of 80 others. Ahtisaari's package on the other side led to Kosovo independence. Kurt's mistake couldn't be bigger than that.

It would be enough for only one of these mistakes to delegate each politician's political career to a developed dedict democracy state. Because history had proved that each one of these errors bore a position to destroy the country. But in Kosovo the word of politicians, as well as their power, weighs too little, and Kurti was given the opportunity to build a serious non-nationalist political party that would be dedicated to offering an alternative to the poor layer of the country.

But he continued with nationalistic populism and the language of violence. Instead of giving voice to the many concerns of citizens of the private sector employees, the unemployed, the informal economy workers, the mobile labour market, the discrimination of women (even in rural countries) so instead of creating a progressive movement, he decided to fight for power in a dirty political scene. His speaker served nationalism. The demarcation, Cakir, Negoti, Serbia, partition of Kosovo, the National Union, Zajednica -- these were his main words.

So, despite two serious catastrophic failures as nationalists, he continued to oppose negotiations with Serbia. Later, he changed his stance and went against negotiations with Serbia unconditionally. And now, it was against the agreement with Serbia without negotiations.

And while he used corruption in the same form as the movements of the extreme right. It was the centre's corruption, corruption of the rotten elites, corruption of commanders a booge that had to be eliminated so that Kosovo could restore well-being.

These (other parties besides VV) have destroyed Kosovo for twenty years.” It's the common line of a VV supporter. What is the logic of such a statement? Does this mean that Milosevic's regime built the country during the years of the 1990s, and then power from the 2000s destroyed the economy, education, health, sports, culture?

No. This is the typical form of how right extremists misuse criticism and opposition to gain power. A banal form of criticism that stifles the rationality of the country's violated and overly confused people. A fucking elite form. The truth is, a part of the people in power, or connected with power, benefited by becoming corrupt during the time that the country developed independent of politics.

But Vetevendosje offered no political option. What was the course we were going to pursue, take it, for negotiations with Serbia, or what was alternative to the resulting alternatives to final compromise? National dignity suddenly became more important than the dignity of hundreds of thousands of people in the country. National dignity, violated national pride, are the words the populist parties in Italy, Hungary, Germany, Poland, eventually Spain and other countries, and they also raised Vetevendosje.

But where are immigrants as an enemy of extreme cheese? For the elite part of Vetevendosje, migrants are the country's villagers. Or even former villagers, because of course there was internal immigration in Kosovo, from village towns in the capital, which irritated a lot of people who had lived in prosperity had gained a higher education than the latter.

Kosovo's villagers during the Yugoslavia era had had undergone much more serious economic conditions, were mainly agricultural and perhaps livestock, had less education, less education, and had not had the same approach in the means emancipon and culture. Being poor, or ex-poor, then mal-educated, exercise, they were even tried by local elites.

Suppose, Veton Surroi openly attacks journalist Baton Haxhiu racistly, mocking his accent and speaking of the province's position more than his. Write to Google Veton Surroi and “Surro's media group, Time, has racisically mocked the residents of Drenica, who voted for PDK.

But beyond that, and many other times, we simply ask ourselves about Albin Kurt's lifestyle. He lives like a minivan. He also thinks of it as elite, even as it were, on a Rubikon show in 2017. It distances itself with “ ” that requires oversimplification messages.

Why does the VV want you to think of yourself as left despite being extreme right? In my opinion, the issue is too trivial to stand up to deeper explanations - snobbery. In the meantime, no issue of progressive left became important to their discretion.

Slavoj Zzizek, the renowned Slovenian philosopher, being ill-informed, attacked other parties that they had ousted Vetevendosje from power by promoting the ultranationalist <x0 passions”. In fact, every citizen of Kosovo knows that Vetevendosje has promoted “nationalist consequences” more than anyone else. It's just Vetevendosje that's promoting today “provincial implications”. Beyond that, from this party that was supposed to be resistant to temptations for discrimination, there was also discrimination on the sex base (of Vjosa Osman), and now against the sexual orientation of a foreign diplomat. Instead of becoming a guardian of freedom of expression, she is attacking him as she looked at him, putting anyone who thinks differently against blackmail: either against us or against the state.

Self - determination must either accept itself as it is - the extreme right - or it must be done as it is: progressive left. Citizens of analysts may be uninformed today, but they will not remain forever uninstructed. One day they will know the truth before themselves.

We shouldn't be blackmailing ourselves: we don't have to choose between going corrupt on one side, and he wants extreme nationalists on the other.

Albin Kurti, being powerful today, has the opportunity to abandon nationalism. No more excuses.