Why did the VV and PDK exchange political positions with each other?

Albin Kurti won this race. Because it was perceived as <x0-sourced better and more honest” than others.

I've mentioned the radical change of PDK attitudes in the past three years. This political party seemed to be copying one by one all the political positions of the Vetevendosje Movement after beginning to understand gradually that it was only formally in power.

They went against the Special Court for which they had pressured him to vote with the reasoning that “we needed to clear”. They went against the Association of Serb-run municipalities [Zieednica] even though they had initially supported it. They were hesitant about the “demarcation issue with Montenegro”, being key to its non-vote in two years' effort during the Mustafa Government. They completely changed their approach to the Kosovo war by marginalizing “renarine for heroism” to jump into the victim's “vault. And now, they've toughened their tongue against international factors in general.

But even Vetevendosje has fled from its fundamental ideas. It ran away from the basic concept of “Proposition” that stands only as a name, which was shaped by the controversy of our political system that was dominated by internationals, representation democracy [repressive]. Vetevendosje once was for direct democracy.

I vote, you vote, he/she vote, we vote, you vote, them/them PEAKING.” wrote on VV activists' walls 12 years ago.

Vetevendosje made a grand leap from its entry into the election race of representationist democracy after realizing that the effort for revolution was a beautiful but irresistable dream. Vetevendosje also gave up the National Union as a political project that attempted to bring Kosovo under Albania. Currently, Kurti wants an Albanian-Kosovo federation that would consist of the state of Albania and Kosovo. So, even for Kurti the state of Kosovo cannot be dissolved. To mention briefly the stance against any negotiations with Serbia, even if the latter would apologise for crimes committed in Kosovo. Or even the stance against government co-operation with the Serbian List, which they rightly viewed as Serbia's extension in our country.

But why does such a radical change in Vetevendosje and PDK attitudes occur?

This is because they exist as political parties only nominally. In fact, there are tribal groups [in the sense of function] led by the rebellious and spites of their leaders. Each political party, except constitutionally for the LDK, has the determination of their leaders as a guiding principle. No leader is vulnerable to members of political parties.

No activist is irreplaceable,” said once Albin Kurti, to add now “except Albin Kurti. ” [with the change of party statute demanding that it resign as party chairman in the event it assumes the prime minister's position]

A deputy activist of Vetevendosje could mention the hegelian concept of negation/mohim to justify this radical change of party attitudes. Suppose, by “No Negociata” in “as more negotiations” [Curti two months ago: “We don't want any agreements without negotiations” to end up in a synthesized stance between two opposed positions: Negotia. The assumed Activist could continue by saying that “movement” as a concept cannot be made without understanding the term “negation” as Hegel puts it. For movement to occur, negtion is necessary.

This is not hegelian dialectic. It's the dialect of madness. Mind-to-ment dance, then head-to- mind at once. From a tee to the opposite, to shape a synthesis shot of both.

These dances in discurs show us how insignificant political leaders are. How insignificant their own attitudes are. The irresponsability for these shift positions also illustrates the lack of a completely unable public sphere to reson its problems. /Periscope