What happened after the sex shift from Blert Morina is very strange

Days ago, the Constitutional Court in Pristina forced The Civil Record Agency to change the gender and name of a citizen by thereby respecting his choice. Blerta chose to be a man and also chose to use the name in Blair. It was a fair decision promoting human freedoms and rights by overlapping individual choice of individual to community choice over individual. The community can choose for community issues, but it cannot choose on individual issues.

But what happened in the days following the court's decision is very strange. All conservative groups in our country, which naturally disagree with the decision, simply chose to remain silent. No single word did the Islamic Community of Kosovo say. [ BIK and no word even came out of the Kosovo Archbishop. Moreover, even the conservative part of society simply chose not to speak publicly.

However, silence was not simply a means of giving up the illustration of the oppression of their knowledge and values [but, not to be misunderstood, it was also]. We had to do with a devious silence that would materialize even politically within a few years. No society can change its values overnight, and that is completely understandable. Even ours can't do that.

He was just a member of PDK that reacted. He said, among other things, that natural truth was more important than someone's feelings. ” So, in other words, Mr. Member of The PDK had said that “gian is not cultural structure but natural structure”. He also highlighted the lack of reaction from conservative institutions that I mentioned earlier.

But we had absolutely no reaction besides him.

Unlike young politician PDK, I think gender is the construction of society. Even to be perfectly honest, my belief is that sex and sexuality are also social structures. And changing the party is more important than changing the gender.

So not only do I fully support the Constitutional Court's decision in Pristina but I have more radical conviction than that on the issue. Yet, such beliefs are totally insignificant in a quiet public environment. In a public realm where values are consumed as goods.

Adoption of liberal values would have to be done through a genuine social debate, which would leave no room for seismisms on one side and mutual stigmatizations on the other. Public debate over the issue would break silence and could not deepen the cultural and value divide among people of this society. After all, we're talking about issues that distract us every day. Each of us.

It is quite clear that emancipation within our society occurs almost the same as the distribution of public goods in the production scheme. Like the salary distribution. The backlogs are mostly poor people because they get less. But why does this happen? Because emancipative values have become like goods imported from abroad, meaning material and consumer things and not the result of public debates.

A conservative of the poor class will never understand the Pristina Foundation Court's decision in the case of Blert Morina. And perhaps even the judges themselves will not really know the reason behind their decision. We took this decision because that's how Kosovo's laws and Constitution are required of us,” may say, but without realizing that behind the country's laws and Constitution is a major and still a quality debate on gender, sex and sexuality. And on the other hand, all this misunderstanding may not be understood by a man “who filled the shell” with liberal values to appear.

And on the one hand, we have a complete lack of debate that shows on one side how much they superficially know the values of liberals themselves, on the other, we have a sharing of talk in private stocks, such as the only warm and safe shelter for people who protect the traditional. But even these private docks have tremendous power and value to most of society.

Let's not forget, we're talking about a society that has produced young men and women that mass life in their families' homes. And not everyone does this because of economic conditions.

Being treated simply as imported goods, of course liberal values are of great importance even in the social structure in general. But, more importantly, being viewed as merely imported goods they remain completely out of public debate with access to <x0 take it, or leave” So, use “to buy or not.” If you do not buy it, you may be ignored and stigmatized.

Conservators in the public sphere are completely expelled. We may disagree with them, but we should not assimilate as the position [Social country in the economic scheme] as a thought. Why, can someone ask? Because that's a deeply non-tolerant, dogmatic approach that is further evidence of non-strategicity. Even the most developed Western countries are facing a “uprising” of the extraordinary sexist, racist, homophobic and traditional culturers, having been oppressed for a long time [Judith Butler says so, a day after Donald Trump's victory in the presidential race against Hillary Clinton in November 2016].

People who believe in traditional values exist. They must be accepted within the public sphere. The change, their oppression, will one day become oppressive to destroy any progress made so far.