The BILD gafa that pulled everyone out

A buevades media joke of the German picture “Bild”, which published and deleted within hours the article that cast doubts about the Russian financing of the PD, has once again exposed the granified hypocrisy of our bipartisanism.

The Relindas, forgetting the recent past, experienced for a few hours an orgasmic happiness by raising the newspaper that was now burying Basha.

In contrast, the Democrats began to trust conspiracy theories with international media purchases, even identifying potential Albanian corrupters, without hesitation repeating the same words that the Socialists had said about the newspaper with the highest circulation in Germany. They even puffed up as triumphators when “Bild” eliminated the article from the page.

In fact, it is difficult to guess what happened between Sunday evening and Monday morning hours until the German picture itself has not provided a serious explanation.

But even without knowing it, some things can be said with conviction.

The fact that the daily, amateurally, erased the scripture entitled “does Russia stand behind the anti-EU membership campaign”? It does not automatically mean that Lulzim Basha is clean for over half a million euros paid to his lobbyists. Despite the fact that the article no longer exists online, despite charges of Russians and anti-negotiation, there are hundreds of thousands of dollars in this vicinity that the DP cannot justify. They have been declared otherwise in Washington and Tirana. The story of the payment for photos with Trump is for the head of the PD, as unclear as that of Rama's mating with the convicted taxi driver in America, Bilalin. Therefore, “correction” of “Bild” is not any of those cases that give you the right to call for victory.

On the other hand, neither the Socialists' claim to lack credibility of “Bold” is warranted. Although between two stories published by the newspaper, she endured to the end, while the other apparently withdrew, this is not the only difference between them.

In the case of surveillance of vote thefts in Durres and Debar, we did not read only the writings and comments of journalist Peter Tiede. We heard by our ears the deals of vote buying, the functioning of the state criminal machinery, the reward of law employees who carried out these acts and the undeniable link to traffickers involved in changing the outcome of the vote.

As for the Russian ties of the DP and Basha's unfinished financing, the paper did not behave the same. <x)

So even if the “Yozerio... The crackdown on Rama's purchase of elections was complete and irrefutable. The evidence for this is that the same facts were recaptured as true as a scrupulous media like “Der Spiegel”. Therefore, the claim to put both “gotiation” into a bag, assuming that anything published by the German picture should not be taken too far to base, constitutes a pattern manipulation.

Just as manipulative are the popular versions there- here that everything against the government published in “Bild”, is the work of a German DP adviser, or that what sêt goes well with the opposition, has paid Taulant Balla.

Those kinds of lies served by militants of both camps are far from true. They're the shitpots that fanatics feed on, who want to see their leader as a pure angel and his black opponent as a devil.

Hence, their inventors speak of the unbelievable “tabloid” when it is not appropriate for them and the biggest newspaper in Germany when it is in their favor.

In fact, the truth is somewhat different.

With the withdrawal of the article published on Sunday evening, “Bild” probably realized there is no obvious evidence for a Russian-Opositor co-operation to prevent the country's progress towards the EU. But, on the other hand, this setback does not amount to any alibi that Basha has not violated the Albanian law of financing parties with over half a million euros to go too far. While the other side cannot even use what the newspaper wrote to swim its propaganda, nor can it use what it erased to question the seriousness of reporting on the theft of elections. /Lapsy/