Should We Trust You?

Politics through its untilvations called political parties approaches citizens in the softest form possible, offering them something to get their faith. The terms of this term, despite their many uses, make sense of a difference, being insignificant. If it is said that these govern better, and so if it is said that I hope that these govern better, in that sense, the term "confidence" in a sense carries a much more powerful cootation than the term "press." If we translate this into the discours of political parties, which have initiated the pre-election campaign on these two concepts, we see that their knowledge does not exceed the level of superficial knowledge.

During election campaigns or even pre-elections, subjects or political parties rely on taking a concrete action as long as their move is in full compliance with the expectations of citizens. In order for that to happen, political subjects must take steps to create this favourable circumstance to create trust. Here most political subjects have already missed, because they are more dependent on the concept of hope. They have done so as well as political causes, but they have failed to disseminate their faith in relation to the citizen, thus pointing out that political subjects themselves lack confidence in their cause and have taken the concept of hope. And the concept of the link used in pre-election campaigns also has the sense of political subject being formed to create the government after the election process.

The former fate or danger will be the one who will escort political subjects in the face of offering something in exchange for citizens' trust, that is, in exchange for vote. Likewise, political parties that will succeed in taking the trust of citizens and who will know how to translate it into power acquisitions will no doubt be forwarded by another risk, the closure of the big subject, so to complete the dialogue process with Serbia with mutual recognition. It is not hope, but belief that presupposes awareness of the circumstances of danger, while self - confidence does not enjoy it. Both faith and self - confidence refer to expectations, while these expectations are both disappointing and destructive.

Party militants usually have a lot of self-confidence, while citizens who are not directly involved in political party policymaking or are not involved in their activities can trust any political subject more than the other, the whole line is not due to preferences, but, as a result of their reflections in relation to what those subjects offer. In this context, citizens can trust their expectations, which will not be disappointing for them.

At least what citizens can do in this regard is to reduce the risk of their expectations. That means investing by vote in those political subjects that offer confidence in their cause, not hope, because it leads nowhere but to the destruction of their expectations.