That was the two simple steps that fought corruption

All political parties in Kosovo at this pre-field meal have announced War against corruption. And it seems that the more unfortunate they have, the stronger their words are. Some even promise that I'm going to try <x0.6x1> and “rooting out” phenomenon in question. Even though, all are self-declared as centre politicians -- centrists. In line with the economic-political system. In his defense.

I have no choice without expressing them will require basic conviction about this problem. I believe corruption is by - product. of our freedoms and rights. I believe that the economic system and political project of liberal internationalism (but not only) in any other country of this world generates different abuse practices with power. So, to put it straight: corruption is right in every neo-liberal and democratic country. The space offered for action by the freedoms and rights that the Constitution defends is space that people use for corruption as well.

Corruption and Freedom

This system itself is corrupting. He briefly mentioned a couple of extremely serious cases. The system in question managed to subdue him and screw him up for the Jews and the left -- Alexis Cypras. He put the heavy suit on your back. He brutally defended the poor. They drove them out of their homes and sold their homes. Similarly, Pablo Iglesias of the mighty Spanish left “Podemos” [ext]. We can. His country's media reported as idealistic politician had bought luxury houses of 600 thousand euros.

Of course, I'm not proposing to proclaim tolerance of corruption, nor to experience the collapse of the system. I just want to clarify the danger that confronts a society when in public legalization they work with neo-religious concepts, with absolute evil on one side, and absolute good on the other. This directly endangers our rights and freedoms, leading the way to authoritarianism and totalitarianism.

The judiciary must be independent in a democratic society. Unfortunately, he is caught to a considerable extent by the party that held power in the past 12 years. But he's not completely caught, and that's shown by the Aphera Proto himself. Those who have listened carefully to those calls realize that the influence of this clan on institutions is not and cannot be complete.

But “High goal” would reason “via”. The “target” that would be fighting corruption would be reasoned through “via <x6x7> that would be the open grip of this part of power. One might say: They are not serious about fighting corruption! But I'm afraid that “anti-corruption fight” can serve as a necessary step towards realising the final goal, which is the full grasp of power in the country. This would make the target “serious.

That what can be done

What can be done is too simple and too ambitious. In the first place, as I have repeated over and over again, a complete review of the labour market took place. Why? Because, much of this market, especially in the public sector, is argumentable. Toad of Powers. So there's a completely unnecessary, invented job that no company or society can see. Why? Because these jobs do not require responsibility, and since no responsibility is required, political parties favour noncompetents who have them. For if high efficiency were required, then the competent would be indispensable. And this should be done: We must make the competent indispensable. But this is a rather romanticized statement because we know that qualified labor power, people with high competence, is limited to numbers.

So, you have to drastically cut staff in public administration. Consider thoroughly the lists of positions in Telekom, Public Television, ministries and other public agencies.

In the private sector, things vary dramatically. That's because competency is the obligation to accumulate profits for business owners. Measurement of performance is the reason for the market competition. But the measure of performance in the public sector production scheme is highly problematic because it does not submit to the market race and opens space for new political abuse.

Another strong idea that changes the sacrifice of political parties to itself is the pledge to stop in employment during the government's mandate. Activists not included in party decision-making bodies and of their families. This ban would challenge him directly nepotism and clientilism. It is evident to all that political parties [not all the same] have linked their activists to the bonds of direct interest, not to ideals. The move would turn idealism into political engagement.

However, even if these actions are taken, there will still be corruption. As there are in Scandinavian countries such as Sweden, Finland, Norway and Denmark. Corruption is part of human nature, as the Men of Nentoc at “says in his reflection Subterranean notes”

All we can do is reduce him. Even the reduction by operating very carefully with the aleti, the vehicle. Because no, in democracy, no purpose applies to the vehicle. The instrument is sacred!