Big problems, small ideas: Kosovo politicians, dockets and morals

Vjosa Osmani is the last candidate for prime minister in the October 6th snap elections. Other candidates are a bunch of men who are covered with primitive patriotism: Kadri Veselini, Ramush Haradinaj, Albin Kurti and Fatmir Limaj.

One of the main criticisms constantly reported is the lack of debate on serious political programmes and ideas. Another criticism is the lack of clear ideological profile. And most importantly, that hasn't been expressed and articulated yet, it's the lack of serious challenging of the quao. In a word, the lack of clear and open war on abusive work practices and culture.

What are the ambitious ideas of opposition parties in these elections? Let's face it: There are no such ideas. We're dealing with a terrible theoretical vacuum. With a sad lack of thought. With a lazy, relaxed mind that does not tire of class and racial discrimination in our society and does not tire of any other problem. And that, for the course, the only people who see the hat are those captives with their direct material interests: party members along with family and relatives. So not only the ruling parties, but opposition parties have also become consistent with the economic system and against abusive social practices.

The lack of strong and distorted ideas in our context makes the ideological distinction between parties invalid and banal. They silence social antagonisms [because certain social groups are opposed to each other, as in any other society] and reconcile through that criminal silence the oppressed man with the oppressor, the poor man with the rich, the private sector worker with that of the public sector, the worker who collects the trash with a four-folder wage worker. And so on.

Thus, we remain within a medieval paradigm where political leaders see them as combs that offer moral solutions and close their ears to what they say, but they overestimate the way they say. Pac-a very similar to some indigenous Mogan tribes, where the chieftain is valued because of the speaker, but his word is completely worthless and taken seriously. We have leaders who stutter and we have speakers. We have people with mouths and men with muscles. But their word in itself should be in full harmony with social values and outlook. Any exit or threat to these values is seen as worse and criminalized. With one word, Kadri Wessel goes to the men's ods, Albin Kurti also goes to the men's ovaries.

No one deserves to receive millions of euros from the poorest country for forgiveness and morality. It would take each political leader to feel the obligation to offer great ideas, ideas that would distinguish and give life to the democracy of the country. Ambitious ideas about policies that would make the right choices.

Political programs have been thought, but why, by these leaders themselves, such as deep and dark things, which would not be easily understood by the masses. Discussions about ideas have been seen as deep theoretical discussions that would then be extended through ideas of political philosophy, one of which is attributed to none.

These ridiculous notions express deep ignorance. The country's ordinary citizen, like any citizen of other democratic societies, is capable of resonating his troubles and troubles. The truth is, leaders themselves aren't able to reson these real troubles and connect them to their programs. For the flow, they find it impossible to offer only a big idea and mobilize people through it.

No one has given any ambitious ideas about hundreds of thousands of women left in the fate of prisoners, like housewives, and who are most exposed to domestic violence. No one has given an ambitious idea of gender destigation of a large range of jobs outside office or buildings. No one has given any ideas about defiction of the labour market, namely, closing unnecessary jobs and generating nepotism and clientlism by being out of responsibility. There is no idea of commitment in any form of young people who remain 60% unemployed. There is also no idea of additional social programmes for Roma communities, the Ashkali and Egypt, living in inhumane conditions. And so on.

These are solidists who want to preserve their privileges. Each thought directly endangers those privileges. So the real alliance is with people like Agim Bahtiri, so rich people are financed by. Of course, they also have a real alliance with party members and their family members.

I will vote Vjosa Osmani, not because there is some extraordinary idea, but because at least at the representational level, it beats the sexism and takes the wind away from important institutions.