“Danas”: The Road Without Serbia-Albanian Political Head

Such a situation does not suit either the Albanian side or the Serbian side, since it represents a potential case for new conflicts. Therefore, the search for a way out of this road without leading is of vital importance to both sides, primarily for Serbia and the Serbian people, since the Serb side is suffering much greater damage and faces much more serious problems.

While Albanians find such a situation difficult to achieve the goals of shaping the state and its position in international reports, there are catastrophic consequences on the Serbian state, primarily in terms of the level of living of the Serbian people and the citizens of Serbia, especially in terms of establishing friendly reports with countries around it, as well as with developed West countries.

Such a state of Serbian-Albanian relations essentially does not respond to either the West or the East, since it is a problem more on the list of problems related to which great powers measure its strength, while the interests of Albanians, respectively, are second.

Serbia's current state-political leadership continues to not manifest commitment to finding out from “without top-over<x1) Serbian-Albanian political leadership, since it is deliberately concerned with fraud that Kosovo's problem can be solved by compromise, with which Serbs would again assume sovereignty over Kosovo. Here, as if “values” that Albanians, relying on the irresistent support of the powerful Western countries, will never give up on Kosovo's territorial integrity.

Therefore, even the cost of Serbia's energy and means in order to increase the number of states that will attract recognition of Kosovo's independence, as well as with the aim of preventing Kosovo from belonging to international organisations, is completely unnecessary and harmful, since history has confirmed the fact that world maps and some states have always drawn the major world powers of war.

Compromise with Albanians, who are now engaged in Serbia's leadership, is certainly not possible, so the ongoing statements of the president of the Republic of Serbia that they are conducting “hard fight for Kosovo, essentially only to postpone and further exacerbate Serbian-Albanian reports. When Ivica Dacic, in accompanying Aleksandar Vucinqi, realizing the weight of Kosovo's problem, signed the Brussels Agreement in 2013, was convinced that such an agreement was in the interest of the Serbian people and the basis for possible compromise with Albanians.

He was the first Republican official to speak publicly that “we can only tempt as much as we want the Constitution of Serbia in Kosovo, but from this there will be nothing”, which all honest and understanding people, given the historic circumstances in which the Serbian people and the state of Serbia, displayed consensus and supported. The main paragraph of the Brussels Agreement dealing with the Kosovo status issue has been implemented so that unformed state creatures continued to function independently, outside Serbia's judicial Croatias.

However, in view of statements by some senior Serbian officials, the impression is gained that the Serbian leadership today is avoiding the fundamental orientation of the Brussels Marriage, almost nothing has happened. The mark of the Brussels Agreement “to die”, while the euro-integration “works hard to carry out”, as well as the clear warning that Serbia's “ ” should take a different course, undoubtedly causes great damage to Serbia and the Serbian people. Such Russianity does not need even friendly Russia, which has never disputed the Serbian-Albanian Agreement in Brussels, nor has it opposed Serbia's strategic orientation towards EU membership, broadcast Koha.net.

The mutual respect of the Brussels Agreement, and with that as well as the acceptance of Kosovo reality from Serbia's side, ʹ constitutes the local assumption of going off the road without Albanian-Serb political leaders and of the final resolution of Kosovo's prophecy. Such an attitude and the starting point of Serbia's leadership, with importance for the current generation that wants calm and dignified lives, rather than suffering and suffering, realists can create conditions for compromise with Albanians, with emphasis on the entire spectrum of generations, instruments and mechanisms for the protection of Kosovo Serb and human rights.

Such an attitude and approach will also accept the Russian Federation (and not only it), since it has repeatedly stressed that, when it comes to Kosovo, it will support what Serbia wants. Understandably, there will be various resistance to such an approach by senior Serbian Orthodox Church clergy, who give up the myth and oath to Kosovo, to extreme Serbian nationalists, to whom Kosovo agony (so-called “the frozen Albanian-Serbian <x1) conflict for privileges achieved, for corruption and enrichment, and for power manipulation. Therefore, today the understanding and support of Russia and China for resolving Kosovo's knot from the most radical interest of the people and the citizens of Serbia is most necessary, since Serbia no longer has the opportunity to pay too high a social price, which imposes Kosovo's problem.