The Institute of édward '%s' urges the minister of education not to adopt new texts without review

After surveying the several-month process of evaluating new textbooks, the Edguard Institute estimates that the shortcomings recorded in this process have corrupted the ministry's primary goal of a transparent process and literal texts, as these do not differ substantially from previous texts. At a media conference held [...]
At a media conference held by representatives of the institute, Minister Shyqi Bytyqi was asked not to approve publishing these texts without their review.
The director of this Institute, Youth Qehaja, said these texts should be revised the quality of these textbooks so that MAST can reflect on the situation, so that no textbooks can be accessed that will be harmful.
Although this process will take several months, Qehaja says that it is better to lose several months than to damage generations with non-quality texts.
He said these texts have no improvement from previous tests. And according to him, new texts will not play a role in even facilitating the school bags of undergraduates.
<x) Therefore, we also demand that the minister not approve these texts and review this decision and these texts in advance... We have about 58 adopted and 8 rejected texts left without a winning assessment of a winning house. This indicates that some 88 percent of every text that has applied in this process has been approved for publication. This in our assessment stirs doubts that such a large statistics of approval of any text in the competition is meaningless in our assessment”, he said.
The doctor's fountain from the Edguard Institute indicated that it would be incompatible for all the long - awaited texts not to distinguish from previous texts.
After their observation of new textbooks, the doctor said that they appreciate that the shortcomings recorded in the process have corrupted the Ministry's primary purpose for a transparent process and literal texts.
It's managing the process that guarantees quality. This included: ensuring transparent selection of reactors, preparation and guidance for evaluation processes, ensuring the secret of manuscripts, commitment to receenses that can professionally cover all standards for texting, ensuring no communication of reactors with publishing houses, transparency and documentation of all steps of the process, and active involvement of KEPS in the process. It is exactly the shortcomings in these parts of the process that greatly affect the final quality of the texts for 48x1>, the doctor said.
In the end, she said any neglect contributing to lack of quality is unacceptable.












