Penis of Anna Brnabiqi

Serbia's prime minister, Anna Brnabiq, stated yesterday to several EU officials that Kosovo's “Albanians are literally people down from Mount” wanting to reason on how Serbian society was peace-loving and rational, while that of the Kosovo Albanians was irrational and war loving. And if there's war or not, it scares me!

I mentioned her sexual orientation because it's supposed that LGBT+ community members are the most progressive people in a society. It is hoped that to reach that point of emancipation to get out as a gay person when you are open to the same sex partner, you have previously removed a series of oppressive values from other marginalized groups. Xenophobia first.

This is because xenophobia has common roots like homophobic. The other who makes you uncomfortable, disgusted, and frightened is not only a member of another ethnic, racial, religious, or political group but, above all, more specifically and sexually.

However, Mrs. Brnabyk seems to have deregulated liberal values only to the extent of releasing her pussy. She used the same falologoric discurs [pollus répenis] as the terrible men who were leaders of Balkan countries who terrorized and killed her, persecuted millions of people of marginalised groups. Serbian prime minister may not have a penis, but gave realisation to the word of the Serbian people “Ist Kurac, nargo minovanje” which makes little- too “in AlbanianThe same penis, but with a package/or other view, ”.

However, this is where the explanation is lacking or completely lacking. How is it that within one body there are such opposed values, on the one hand wild and disfellowshipped nationalism, and on the other progressive ideas targeting the admission of gays, transformors, and other sexual orientations?

We may note a few similarities in the communist leaders of the 1980s. Including Enver Hoxha and Albanian harsh communism after breaking ties with China. Communist leaders were also internationalists and nationalists and fascists.

But why is there this ideological and valuable tangle inside these bodies? On one side, we have structured functioning of traditional oppressive values that appear mainly and are fully processed in the poor rural layer [in Brnabiqi's words, on people coming down from the mountain], while on the other, we have the harsh and insurgent injection of liberal values that remain without structure and content in their public manifestation.

These values are circulated within the cultural and political elite but do not translate into a widespread social change. On the contrary, the institute use of these values makes it a point to keep social contact with poor or poor people.

For Brnabych these values matter as long as they release her sexuality and as long as they serve to save her social status. In this case, except for Serbian culture from that of the Kosovo Albanians. But the same is true of other people within our culture. Support against marginalised groups, even if you are part of them, makes a cultural overlap.

Brnabiqi's words reflect precisely the tendency for cultural superiority more than national or racial.

The hypocritical use of values by elite has an economy of its own. Consistence in value would also allow people of the marginalised layers to understand their scheme by making their social affiliation irelevant. For Serbs, it doesn't matter what an Albanian believes, what values he's performing he'll always be wrong, coming down from the mountain.

It is the same hypocritical use of values in our society. Our cultural, political and economic elite holds the dictatorship in using values, in determining anti-values, in measuring them, in their scheme, and so on. It gives itself a cultural and moral superiority based on its social position, rather than on the values it displays. If off the mountain it's sexist and racist, bad. If he's a cosmopolite feminist, even worse.