Did Ronaldo make us all a peach salesman?

Last night, news of what the vaki did in Turin, Italy, was occupied. Christiano Ronaldo, Portuguese football player, scored three goals and overturned his team's disadvantage, Juvenus.

Football is an important form of culture to understand social and political developments.

Juventu passed on to the quarterfinals of a non-companion race [The Champions' League], where billions of euros have been spent in one thing in recent decades in a specific way: narrowing competition. That the football world is mired in corruption shows penalties and doubts about the leaders of the biggest federations, FIFA and UEFA. Platini, Blatt, and their followers served the interests of powerful people in politics and commerce.

Over the past two decades, football homes have violated financial regulations by allowing giants to reap success at the expense of smaller teams. Suppose, in the 1990s, the Champions League was won by weak teams such as Belgrade's Crvena Zvezda, Marseilleja, Ajax and Dortmund. Moreover, even giant winning teams such as Manchester United, Real Madrid, Juventu, and Barcelona were in a much weaker financial situation.

But with the beginning of the 2000 ' s, this game effectively ruled out most teams without financial heels from the real race for the main European trophy, which serves as an illustration both for what happened in national leagues. The race narrowed so much that in the last decade, Real Madrid and Barcelona participated in six of them. In England, that was from the 1990s when Manchester United's hegemony marred the likelihood of ten-five season crews being champions, as it did in the '80s, '70s, '60s. In Italy, now eight years old is a championship team. In Spain, the unfair distribution of income from television rights has created Real Madrid and Barcelona hegemony. In France, the league is in full possession of Paris SG. And so on.

So, the introduction of billions into football resulted in nearly full control of the race itself as a concept. It belongs to large teams that do not depend on production by academys, nor on trainers, nor on players' performance. [If one does not perform well, it is not expected, the other] is bought.

Creativity, spontaneousity, and unpredictableness were declared enemies and ambivalent. UEFA and FIFA managed to convert football fans, not into laity, nor to disciples, but to prophets who accurately foresee what will happen. It wasn't hard. This accuracy in prediction is essential for investments made by oligarchs from all over the world.

Previously, even on ideological issues, I was a fan of Arsenal. A club that does not give executive power to major shareholders. But also because of the sympathy for the creative mind of Coach Arsen Vanger. Now, I am a supporter of teams without major achievements, such as Portsmouth [Portsmouth] in England [owned by its fans] St Paulley in Germany [having anti-fascist, anti-racist, anti-homophobia and anti-sexistic fans]. Although, I rarely see soccer matches in the last three or four years.

Why? Because man must develop meaningful relationships with things. To invest his emotions in fulfilling and meaningful things. If we like football, then let's not worry about it. Football, which began to be entertained as a pleasure after work during the industrial revolution in numerous English cities, is at its core and preserves local character. Most teams, including economic giants, bear city names or reach out to specific cities, and they are founded in the history of local industrial development. But what does it connect me to a certain European city? Nothing. Therefore, I see with snore last night the post of Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama, who was delighted that his favourite team won. Albanian football is currently banned because of the referral protest that was undergoing violence in the country's stadiums. It doesn't even happen better in Kosovo football.

Even four years after admission to U EFA and FIFA, football in Kosovo remains at a level that is technically called half-maratorsk. Furthermore, football is not a marginalised sport by any other popular sport. Or from a more popular form of culture, to grab a theater or a theater or a movie. No, from a lot of people with their flesh and soul after international football. You hear talk about this all the time. They've had an expensive thrill in European giants while completely ignoring local teams. In general, economic benefits from the demand for football are not oriented toward the development of football academies, the best stadium infrastructure, the quality of the game, but these talk about international football, the cafes that show these matches, and other forms that we may know.

This is another indication of the lost soul of this collective. A slave's soul that does not require pure authenticity in sports and art but only drunkenness and slander.

Sports began during the first phase of the industrial revolution, and were thought of as leisure fun, out of work. Sports pathology says it is a mental retreat from serious things. But we are unemployed societies [considering production scheme, meaning what we produce, turns out that even those who work in fact don't work] and unseriously. Thus, sports cannot be described as a marginal part of our identity. No, he's in the center. At least, the job is so banal that the very international sport of illiterate people such as Messia and Ronaldo is more important [or at least more meaningful] of life than the work you do.

This release of time from any meaning, from any significant commitment [excluding it for survival and social status] would have to move us to think seriously about the character of oppression we attribute to each other in our history.

*Title has to do with the coach of Atletico Madrid who said he would be a peach salesman if he was defeated by Juvenus. The title could also be “Why sell pjepra is better than marking straight in a corrupt race?” Or else.