Politicians' employed family and garbage collectors

PTK is in bankruptcy. This was learned a year ago. And these days, news of family employment is being circulated by AAK officials in this company who want to plunder it, viewing it as simply a waste that cannot be saved. So they're not there to take out in any way from the crisis this company that once added a large sum of money to the country's budget.

All other parliamentary parties have made the same trick. We have no example of how to protect public interest from the private interests of politicians, activists, and family members. Not even Vetevendosje!

No one has a proposal on how to stop or reduce the large appetite of political activists. No leader managed to connect his activists through the shackles of ideals. All activists in one way or another took their commitment in return with a later favor.

But let's not repeat the tired clichés. Industrial nepotism and clientelelymism are more than just the evil and abuse of powerful people. It proclaims the vast space created/allowed by previous powers for such activity. Much of the labour market is off-key, invented. It contains jobs that no one sees.

Let's ask a basic question: How can there be room for so many underemployed? The answer is simple: Because it doesn't matter whether you meet the criteria or not, work at its core is unnecessary. So to illustrate: even if PTK was to take on a skilled worker, his work would have no function.

And as in the PTK case, abuse is widespread. The brutal truth is that much work is of no real value. And so, they're accessible to nepotism, clientelelymism and other job-making tricks. They do not solve any problems or offer any service. Although, they are either paid directly by the citizens' taxes, or by the problems they have [outside donations].

It's not that all are employed through clientistic and nepotistic forms. In fact, most people I know are resourceful and capable, and they manage to get jobs that are paid five times the size of real work without anyone's help. I meet the criteria. Yet, their work remains fabricated. So when they do not expect a certain result from the work of such a worker, their logic says better than the distant one. After all, such jobs simply offer privileges and do not require accountability.

Such shut-down work spaces exist in any other democratic society, but in smaller size. And Demos was here so wild and vulgar that he became the architect of a giant space for unnecessary work and nepotism and clientele. That's exactly what this édemos was asking for ease in the study, the degree, and therefore the university doors opened, and even other universities opened for him, private colleges, the public administration expanded, and the last but most importantly, were fabricated or exaggerated, so that others would feed on them, making them appear to choose them.

We think of the garbage collectors we see hanging from the truck trailer that load and download the remains of our consumption. Their work is of real value. But I prejudge that you pay four-fivefold less than the average of a fake job. And in general, people who do such things, who view your daily benefit, have become slaves, such as the alnets that speak.

What if the garbage collectors broke into the strike? As Dutch historian Rutger Breggman asked. It would cover us.

What if NGOs were to go on strike? Or the deputy ministers? Or the ministers' political advisers? Or did the ministers themselves? Or university professors? Or the Post and Telecom workers, and RTK? Or other false workers? Well, we're gonna get rid of a lot of the farce!

P.S. We should not be blinded enough to see and appreciate the dedication and zeal that can be enjoyed by capable people in such dysfunctional work.