The toxic maleity can be heroic, and these are the women who testify.

When I try to explain to the students what the free “acionations in psychoanalytic treatment mean, I regularly refer to the famous saying: “Don't shoot the baby along with its water and shit! ”

When a psychiatrist asks the patient to associate peacefully “”, for example, suspend the control of ego and tell you what he wants to think about, doesn't he look for a psychiatrist to say exactly the opposite?

The patient has to shoot the baby [egon] and hold only the toilet water for free association. The idea is, of course, that this piece of shit “will bring the hidden truths of the healthy ego itself. Remember, shit in the water comes from the baby, not from the outside!

Does not the same apply to many false ecologists? They're obsessed with sustainable “ ” and healthy in green and clean habitats, ignoring the twitt of the shit that flows around the area. If someone wants to deal seriously with pollution, the first thing I have to do is focus on the surrounding area and analyze how our isolated habitats of the stable “” simply export pollution to their surroundings.

Maybe we should take the opposite approach if we're thinking about what's going on in Japan: concentrate as much pollution and population as possible in big cities, so they function like dirty babies in dirty [relatively] water.

Another example: The apparent number of pedophile crimes that settled in the Catholic Church worldwide, from Ireland and Pennsylvania to Australia. They are crimes committed by members of an institution that promotes itself as a moral compass of our society, and they force us to reject the light idea that Church can simply hunt the bad priests and hold the good.

There's a “institutional consciousness”; a disunited and ungrateful divide that holds the public institution. It is not just for the sake of the comfort the church has tried to silence the pedophile scandals; rather, in self - defense, the church was defending its most shameful secret.

Perhaps the most obvious example was offered by the recent debate on toxicity. As a response to Gillette's latest announcement to make men less violent, and better, we have often heard the idea that advertising was not directed against men, but only the toxic side. In short, the ad signaled that we have to remove brutal male dirt and water.

But there are problems here. Let us take a closer look at the list [proposed by America's Psychological Association] of traits that are thought to characterize “toxic bixyity”: emotional oppression and masking of anxiety; the irreplacency of seeking help; the tendency to take risks even if this requires the involvement of the risk for self - injury. I don't understand exactly what the male “ ” is on this list.

Does not a simple act of courage respond to this in a difficult situation in which one must suppress emotions, where one cannot rely on any help but who takes risks and acts, even if this means exposing himself to hurt?

I know more women than men who were in trouble, have not been subjected to environmental pressure, and have acted in the way I described. Consider an example from Greek mythology: When Antigon decided to bury Polynics, did he not do the same act that is typified as “toxhox “tox1>?

She also suppressed her emotions and disguised her anxiety, refused to seek help, and took on a serious danger that could hurt her deeply. In our time of correct political conformism, such an attitude poses a danger.

We find traces of this classic feminin figure of courage even in today's popular culture, in popular television series, Homeland and The Killing.

Heroin e Homeland By the name of Carrie Mathison, a bipolar disorder CIA officer, is involved in the fight against terrorism. Its strict sense of justice moves her to break many rules and conflict with her superiors, which is life threatening. It's like Inspector Sarah Lund, the heroin of the fantastic Danish series. The Killing, another character that reacts violently to the hypocrisy of the estabilist and that ends up as indecisive. God gives us as much of these women with toxic males in our lives!

It's a good joke from the zender “Radio Yerevan”: A listener asks “is true that Rabinovitch won a new car in the lottery?” and radio answers: “yes, it's true, but it wasn't a new car but an old bicycle and it didn't win but it was stolen earlier. ”

Does it not stand the same for toxicity?

Let's ask Radio Yerevan: “Is the real toxic masking?” We can imagine the answer: “in principle yes, it is true, but toxicity is not specifically male, plus it stands for what is the most reasonable and courageous way to act.” /Periscopi