Mystery Donald Trump

President Trump continues to intrigued political analysts and foreign policy experts. It implements an external policy through tweeting decisions and advertising comments and opinions in similar ways. It minimizes all the traditional tools of conducting diplomacy and crashes face - to - face with most of the known allies of the United States. He does not select words and often speaks out in front of observers and foreign dignitaries who feel ashamed. It follows policies related to the economy and immigration that often violate traditional and politically correct norms. Trump's behaviour shocks the Western political elites. In pursuit of their direction, traditional State Department officials feel shocked by his behavior. They usually express their contempt through public statements or published articles. They generate a widespread atmosphere of inadequacy about how America accomplishes its external affairs today.

However, an important question remains. Do President Trump's policies produce the catastrophic effects that analysts describe or produce the intended results?

To begin with, let us see whether the world media treats that way with honesty or not. According to the assessment, they don't treat him. For example, during his last visit to Great Britain, he met with the Queen after an hour's delay. American media didn't stop. They accused the president of being late for his meeting with Queen Elizabeth. The truth, however, was that Elizabeth herself had postponed her predetermined meeting and Trump politely ignored the incident...

In terms of the forged battle about the <x0 family divisions of illegal immigrants, reporting is completely off track. President Trump decided to implement the existing legal framework that was defined years ago by the American government, likely during Bill Clinton's presidency. These legal measures have been repeatedly violated by previous administrations. According to this legal framework, those who violate America's borders are arrested and thrown into prison. If there are children among them, the state cares for them and, instead of sending them to prison, keeps them safe in specific structures. Would it be better for children to go to prison or, as was done in the past, the law was forgotten and everyone was free on American soil?

American media seem to point the target at the president's reaction while ignoring the guilt of parents trying to illegally cross American borders while having their children with them...

President Trump also decided to stop the entry of pregnant women from abroad (particularly from Mexico and Central America) who are later born in the United States, taking advantage of important services free of charge, while newborns are granted American citizenship. Are these measures really wrong?

Donald Trump found a way out of the mess with North Korea through the establishment of direct communication lines with the jinn and effectively using China as mediators. However, the American media, along with political establiment, minimized its efforts as retired diplomats continued to praise the bad way this issue was managed by the Obama administration! Also, Trump succeeded in searching their own crates and financing their obligations to NATO. As Milton Friedman once said: “There is no such thing as free lunch” Of course, protection and security come at cost and states have to pay for them. You can never rely on someone else to carry the burden for you.

Similarly, on the issue of exports with the United States, Trump's decision to impose higher, yet reluctant, tariffs appears to have brought some results. Europe (abviously Germany) and China are discussing the situation with the United States while there has never been any kind of conversation before and there can be a positive, mutually beneficial outcome.

As far as relations with Russia are concerned, the president seems to face the most severe criticism. He's even charged with high treason. It's only because he decided to speak to “in private with Vladimir Putin and to express some respect for his counterpart's opinions, thus somehow bringing American relations to the ground. He decided to leave the fobis and prefabrics deeply embedded anti-Kremlin, and this could lead to better relations between the two countries. We must not forget that at this front Donald Trump is simply sticking to his election promises. The American people voted to approve the possibility of a more sincere and closer relationship with Russia. However, Washington elites do not approve of that. Trump must not be allowed to keep his election promises...

The American president cuts taxes significantly. His decision can be felt almost immediately in the performance of the American economy. Unemployment has significantly heavy, results increased and productivity started to experience better days.

Also, it is interesting to note President Trump's reaction when he learns that his ambassador to Athens has claimed that Greece is a “loss of stability” in the region, as to coincidence just the day the Athens government decided to move convicted terrorist killers (between their victims, American, British and Turkish) from a maximum security prison in the soft environment of an agroburg!

Generally speaking, President Trump's policies challenge the ideas of political honesty and give a voice to middle America that does not see eye-to-eye problems with political elites. Most important of all, Trumpism seems to be a response to the hopes the American electorate has when they are placed over the new resident of the White House. Are these aspects of the American president's approach and behavior condemned?