Who should be the answer to Trump

The liberal American elite is also terrified of Donald Trump, but also unable to morally strike him. What they've done is turn left, led to new faces.

Now that another week of President Trump's crazy actions has been left behind us, and that slowly slips into memory, we can reflect on that chaotic thing he left behind his trip abroad.

The American president visited three countries: Brussels where it met the leading European leaders, London to meet Theresa May and Queen, plus Helsinki where he held a summit with Vladimir Putin.

While most commentators described the strange fact that Trump was more friendly with America's enemy than with traditional allies, it should not surprise us so much. Our attention should be turned into another direction. As is usually true of Trump, reactions to his actions are more important than what he actually does or says.

Various Attitudes

Let's start by comparing what Trump said his partners said. When Trump and Mayi were asked what they thought about the influx of immigrants to Europe, Trump brutally and honestly showed his populist anti-imgration position: migrants are a threat to the European way of life; they are destabilizing our countries' security and bringing violence and intolerance. So we have to keep them out.

A careful listener could note that Theresa May said exactly the same thing, only in a more diplomatic way and the civilized “ ”: immigrants bring diversity, contribute to our well-being, but we must carefully control those we want to let in. So we take a taste of choice which is more and more the only one to be introduced to us: direct populist barbarism or a more civilized version of the same politics, human-faced barbarism.

Generally, reactions to Trump from everywhere, including Republicans and Democrats in the United States, constituted a global shock and fear. That sometimes went through total panic. We heard that Trump is unstable and brings chaos.

For example, he first opposed Germany's reliance on Russian gas and thus became vulnerable to Nato's enemy, but a few days later he appeared very friendly with Putin.

Then there are other ways: with the meeting with the queen, he violated the protocol of how you should behave in the presence of a monarch! And he did not really listen to his democratic partners being on the other side much more open to Putin's charm, which is regarded these days as America's greatest enemy.

Very good

True, the way he was brought to the press conference with Putin in Helsinki was not only an unprecedented humiliation [we thought he did not act like Putin's chief!], and some of his statements may have been considered treacherous, as we heard.

The rumors turned out that Trump was acting like Putin's doll because the Russian side had something compromised for [the famous prostitutes' fotographies pissing in Moscow?], and part of the American electorate. The Democrats and some Republicans began to consider a quick accusation, even if Mike Pence instead began to appear president.

After all, the conclusion was simply that the president of the United States is no longer the leader of the free world: but was the U.S. President ever such a leader? This is where our counterattack will begin.

Let's first say that there are some truths here in Trump's statements: wasn't there a right way to say that our interest is to have good relations with Russia and China to prevent war? Was it not partly correct to present his war fees as the protection of American workers?

The fact is that the existing order of trade and international finance is far from being fair, and that the European establiment liquidated by Trump's masses should look to its sins. Have we already forgotten that existing trade and financial rules privilege the strong European states, particularly Germany, which brought Greece to ruin?

It takes two for tango

As for Putin, I personally believe the Russians were involved in the U.S. elections, but what did Putin get caught doing? Just what the U.S. do regularly and passively, except when they get caught doing the same, they call democracy protection? Yes, Trump is a monster and when he described himself as the stable “gen. We have to read the opposite of that. He's an unstable idiot who's bothering the issue. But as such, it is a symptom, a consequence of what is wrong with estabilism in itself. And the sample or the real monster is the establiment itself shocked by Trump's actions.

Panic reactions following Trump's recent actions demonstrate that he is destabilizing the US political establishment and its ideology. So our conclusion must be: yes, the situation is dangerous, there is uncertainty and elements of chaos in international relations but in this very case we should remember Mao's motto: “There's a huge mess under the sky, so the situation is perfect! ”

Don't lose your nerve. Instead, we can exploit confusion by organising another anti-altarism front from the left. The signs are clear here are the surprising victory of Alexander Ocasio-Cortez, a self-called Social Democrat, against Joe Crowley was the first in a series of shocks to transform the American Democrats. People like her, not familiar, should be the answer to Trump and not the tired faces from the liberal establiment.